9/11 Sparked Decade Of Madness Against Photographers

Ten years ago today, terrorists flew planes into the World Trade Center, suddenly turning all photographers into suspected terrorists.
But there has never been any evidence that terrorists used cameras to document their targets before striking them.
Bruce Schneier, a man who obsesses about security more than I obsess about photographers’ rights, pointed this fact out in a memorable 2008 article which needs to be revisited today.
Since 9/11, there has been an increasing war on photography. Photographers have been harassed, questioned, detained, arrested or worse, and declared to be unwelcome. We've been repeatedly told to watch out for photographers, especially suspicious ones. Clearly any terrorist is going to first photograph his target, so vigilance is required.
Except that it's nonsense. The 9/11 terrorists didn't photograph anything. Nor did the London transport bombers, the Madrid subway bombers, or the liquid bombers arrested in 2006. Timothy McVeigh didn't photograph the Oklahoma City Federal Building. The Unabomber didn't photograph anything; neither did shoe-bomber Richard Reid. Photographs aren't being found amongst the papers of Palestinian suicide bombers. The IRA wasn't known for its photography. Even those manufactured terrorist plots that the US government likes to talk about -- the Ft. Dix terrorists, the JFK airport bombers, the Miami 7, the Lackawanna 6 -- no photography.
Given that real terrorists, and even wannabe terrorists, don't seem to photograph anything, why is it such pervasive conventional wisdom that terrorists photograph their targets? Why are our fears so great that we have no choice but to be suspicious of any photographer?
Because it's a movie-plot threat.
In the movies, terrorists photograph their targets because it’s lets the viewers know what’s going to happen.
In real life, terrorists do all they can to prevent people from knowing their intentions.
But despite this logic, police and security guards still associate photographers with terrorists, including an incident last month where a professional videographer was arrested for allegedly making bomb threats after he was confronted by a security guard for videotaping the outside of a building.
It’s been a decade of madness, escalated by the fact that almost everybody is carrying a camera these days. It is just now that the ACLU has begun an aggressive campaign against this insanity.
The truth is, this ongoing war against photographers has nothing to do with terrorism and everything to do with the fact that we all have access to the internet.
For the first time in history, we have true Freedom of the Press through blogs, Youtube, Facebook, Twitter and more recently, Google Plus.
And that’s a freedom that scares the hell out of authorities.
Can you fix the focus on a blurry photo after the fact?
The birth of Mirrorless Cameras
MiMedia, letting you access your media, wherever you are
Lightroom 4 on Apple's Mac App Store
Choosing your first dSLR camera
New York City can be beautiful!
The Fujifilm Finepix X10, A Review
Choosing the Right Light Stand
Photojojo iPhone Telephoto Lens review — AudioCast
My week with Q
How To Become A Successful Photographer
"When the Wind Stopped" — poem with 4 photos
Strategies for shooting action
20 Tips for Insects on Flowers
Cast aways - saving those photographic memories
One Man Show: My 25 Years With Digital Photography
Studio, Flash, & Available Light — Three Books Reviewed
Portrait styling: dangerous pairings
Adobe Photoshop CS6 Product Managers Interview Audiocast
A gift of flowers: unfold your senses
On Set of "Love & Robots" the Film
Ilford Galerie Gold Fibre Silk Inkjet Paper — Audiocast











Planning “National Geographic” style photo travel
Wilderness Travel 1 Rainforests – Essential Gear
Backlighting Basics
A Brief History Of Light & Photography: Part 3 of 3
A Brief History Of Light & Photography: Part 2 Of 3
What Moves You?
FIGURES IN MOTION: Decades of Evolving Personal Imagery in Photography, Part 7
Lomography Store, Austin, Texas — GALLERY
GALLERY — Up to $1,000 Reward for Cattle Rustlers
Taking your Portraiture Higher
The "Bible" of Time-Lapse Photography
Interview with Harold Davis — Closeup Maestro of Flowers & Water Drops
Interview with Steve Caplin — Photoshop Digital Artist, Commercial Illustrator, & Author
Easy technique to select, edit and sequence keywords for web
How much should you charge for a photograph?































Comments
Quite true, and that's just ONE of the ways photographers are suspected of being up to no good. Two others:
. If there are any children within 600 miles of where you're photographing, you're suspected of having evil designs on children.
. If any cops are in your field of view, there's a good chance those cops are going to find your filming, shall we say, inconvenient. Being as they're cops, they think they run the world, and you're likely to get hassled, if not beat up and then charged with resisting arrest.
All of these need to be fixed ASAP.
kudos to bruce schneier
I was harassed by security guards for videotaping off the San Diego Trolley. The video and the description of what happened is at the bottom of this posting.
What's annoying and disturbing is the comment some jerk posting DEFENDING the actions of the security guards. Unfortunately, people like him make up a majority of the population. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hHy8un-Z754
Did you get the part of them harassing you on video?
this is on the 9/11 memorial rules in NY
XIII. Photography, Videography, and the Use of Visual Recording Devices
Personal photography is permitted. The following are prohibited, unless otherwise authorized by the 9/11 Memorial’s Department of Public Affairs and Communications:
a. Taking photographs for advertising or commercial purposes,
b. Using cameras or other visual recording devices in the security screening area, other restricted areas or in internal offices, and
c. Using studio set-ups, tripods, and/or professional photography equipment.
i. Such camera set-ups are subject to security screening pursuant to Section VII and are permissible, and for use, on Memorial Property at the discretion of 9/11 security personnel.
d. The 9/11 Memorial reserves the right to terminate access and photographic/recording usage rights of any user or group at any time.
i. Any visitors to Memorial Property must respect all other visitors, and must also realize that due to the somber nature of this establishment, not all visitors wish to be taped, photographed, recorded, or bothered in any other manner.
d. Ten years later and the terrorists are still winning.
Is the 9/11 Memorial considered to be on public or private land?
Im from Jersey, we were told the price hikes at the bridges, tunnels, metro, nj transit etc were going up to help fund the 911 memorial as well as the new towers.Our money helping to fund would certainly constitute as public property.
I'd love to know their interpretation of "professional photography equipment."
This isn't about terrorism anymore.
Maybe it was 6 or 7 years ago, but the terrorism excuse is just used by Government officials to control the actions and freedoms of the common man.
That pesky Constitution and Bill of Rights has gotten in their way for to long now. Osama gave them the excuse they've been looking for.
I'll go one further and say that 9/11 sparked a decade of madness, period, end of sentence, full stop. I will concede, though, that photographers, travelers, technologists and anyone who might look vaguely arabic have borne the brunt of it.
I had a very engaging conversation about the TSA last night with a friend who is a flight attendant for a major airline. (its a conversation we, as a nation, need to have more often!)
And ironically, it was during the Cowboys/Jets game when Tony Romo threw that last interception to Darrelle Revis, one of the best cornerbacks in football. And I was screaming at the TV, "Why the hell are you throwing the ball at the guy? He will burn you all day and you KNOW it!"
Which segued back into our conversation about the TSA . . . and my point was, a good football team sees your defensive game plan and makes adjustments. They don't try the same thing over and over and over after it has failed. And neither do terrorists. Do we really believe after 10 years of losing our collective minds and taking off our shoes at the airport, al Qaeda would ever have an active shoe bomber plot? EVER? Their first and only shoe bomb plot failed MISERABLY from a tactical standpoint, but was quite effective in its secondary goal of making us do stupid things out of fear. Has all this removing of shoes REALLY prevented another shoe bomb? Nope, they went to the underwear bomb (failed) and now they talk about a colon bomb.
As a country, we have to keep up our defenses, but we really need to stop doing stupid and senseless things that play into the hands of the terrorists. Their goal is NOT to kill us all, but to turn us into paranoid, frightened sheep who will gladly give up our precious freedoms for a false sense of security. The scary thing is that the police and security personnel are TRAINED to be suspicious of things that are not threats, and it distracts them from the REAL threats.
Hey, maybe the internet is a threat, because I've had someone seriously tell me that posting videos of TSA check points on youtube helps al qaeda learn our defenses and plot attacks against airports. Sadly, I agree this is how too many people think, but here's my suggestion . . .
if the terrorists know you are going after photographers, what's to stop them from sending out a dozen photographers to grab your attention and distract you while they take advantage of the distraction and confusion to execute a REALLY terrible plot?
let's not be a nation of Tony Romos and throw the ball right at the defender . . . play smart!
The apparent ineptness of subsequent 'terrorism' efforts makes me think the act is not the objective -- the predictable over-reaction to it is.
Can anyone with an ounce of common sense really believe a shoe/underwear bomber wouldn't figure out how construct a reliable and effective bomb before trying to use it -- IF they really intended it to work?
I agree with JS, above.
TSA policy has little to do with logic. It's all about the image. Bureaucratize rather than "solve" the problem.
There are 1000 ways to kill Americans and the plane method was already used, an unlikely venue for any future attack because nowadays 200 passengers will try to kill any hijackers on the spot.
My favorite TSA lunacy video was
people getting *off* the *train* in GA and getting groped by TSA-holes.
Completely ridiculous.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V1B3AubsTBo
If you were to read Bruce Schneier's (sp?) book "Beyond Fear" all the lunacy related to TSA makes sense, as security THEATER. No one can truly be safe, the Israeli's El Al airline is the safest, they don't care if they piss you off, if you are hinky they pull you out of line and grill you like a steak. And my understanding is that those people get a heck of a lot better security training than most of our airline lackeys..
All this comes down to the simple fact that the likelyhood of being involved in a terrorist event in this country is infinitesimally small in comparison to getting killed in your car on the way to or from work.. So while you should report odd things don't get all in a tizzy about it, its probably nothing..
I use the term 'elephant repellant' from an old joke which ends with 'Well, you don't see any around elephants, do you?'
Terrorist never attacked WTC-7.Terrorist never flew aircraft into WTC-7. Why do so many Americans believe the Government/Media complex official (lie) story?
Can you watch this video of a 40 + story, steel framed,
reinforced concrete structure collapse into it's own footprint and not at least question the official story?
Please stop believing the lie,our loss of liberty since 9/11/01 are not unintended consequences they are purposeful intent!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WieKk2o5GS8
Careful my friend. Are you calling hundred of my brothers of the FDNY liars? They all knew exactly what was going to happen with WTC 7, and why.
Watch your mouth around me if you're going to come out with crap like that, sunshine.
Mike
Hey Mike I'm your huckleberry not your friend!
You watch your mouth and who you threaten. Got it Jerk!
I don't know you or your FDNY friends and if you can't see the truth before your eyes I can't help you!Many of your FDNY friends are heroes but they died for a lie.
Jeff St Augustine Fl
The FDNY guys who entered building 7, who knew about the serious fire conditions in building 7, who knew it was coming down because they had no water to even start fighting the fires, and STILL had to be restrained from entering the collapse zone to search for their brothers who had been buried when 1 & 2 came down, you're saying they're ALL LIARS? That they're in on some dipshit conspiracy? That's the unavoidable implication of what you're saying.
That is going to get an extremely hostile response from any fireman.
They sure as hell know their fire science and building construction. So do I. Better than you. Go read 'Report from Ground Zero' - it's a good read, written by an old-school fireman, and will give you a much more accurate idea about conditions at the site than anything else.
I say again, watch your mouth. I can forgive ignorance, I can't forgive ignorance running its mouth so insultingly.
This is *seriously* off-topic for this forum anyway.
Mike
Hey Mike call me a dip shit all you want.But are you want to call fellow firefighters,fellow first responders,family members,architects,engineers,pilots,congress men and women,men and women serving or vets of the military,and thousands of Americans who question the official story of 9/11/2001 dip shits also?
Maybe your the one who should watch your mouth.
I'm not seeking your forgiveness.I'm just hoping you will open that closed mind.
Jeff
Actually, nobody ever said they flew an aircraft into that building.
Hey Carlos I apologize for the tone in which I responded to Mike Ross on your web sight.I'm usually better at responding to veiled threats of implied violence without loosing my cool and responding in kind.
Please take some time and view this video about WTC7.The video was done by Architects,Engineers,Firefighter,and Family Members seeking the truth.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hZEvA8BCoBw&feature=player_embedded#!
Firefighters for 9-11 Truth is a non-partisan association of firefighters and affiliates created to increase awareness, provide public education, demand a real investigation that follows National Standards, and provide support to our Brothers and Sisters in need. We are deeply troubled by the “official story,” and the way the rescue workers from Ground Zero are being forgotten.
We believe there is overwhelming evidence of obstruction of justice, and destruction of evidence voiced even by numerous 9/11 Commissioners themselves. Senator Cleland resigned from the Commission stating, “This investigation is now compromised.”
NFPA (National Fire Protection Association) 921, which is the National Standard for Fire and Explosion Investigations, very clearly indicates in numerous sections that the possibility of explosives should have been thoroughly investigated. Specifically in NFPA 921 18.3.2 High Order Damage - “High-order damage is characterized by shattering of the structure, producing small, pulverized debris. Walls, roofs, and structural members are splintered or shattered, with the building completely demolished. Debris is thrown great distances, possibly hundreds of feet. High-order damage is the result of rapid rates of pressure rise.” World Trade Center’s 1, 2, and 7 all clearly met this definition; therefore they should have been thoroughly investigated and analyzed for explosives. Specifically, the use of “exotic accelerants” should have been investigated. In NFPA 921 19.2.4 -”Exotic Accelerants,” three indicators were clearly met that should have led to a thorough investigation in to the possible use of “exotic accelerants,” specifically as stated in the guideline, “Thermite mixtures.”
So, why was the possibility of explosives, controlled demolition, or the use of “exotic accelerants” not thoroughly investigated, or even mentioned in the 9-11 Commission Report?
Firefighters for 9-11 Truth demand the following:
1. A truly independent investigation with Subpoena and Contempt Powers to uncover the complete truth of the events related to 9/11/2001, specifically the collapse of WTC Tower 7 and the possibility of explosive demolition.
2. The investigation to follow the national standards so clearly outlined in the National Fire Protection Association guidelines, specifically, NFPA 921 to include thorough analysis of the steel for the presence of “exotic accelerants.”
3. Congress to honor the promises made to the rescue workers of 9/11 by passing the James Zadroga 9/11 Health and Compensation Act of 2008.
4. Prosecution of all individuals willfully involved in the planning, and execution of the murders committed on September 11, 2001.
5. Prosecution of all individuals willfully involved in the Obstruction of Justice and Destruction of Evidence surrounding the events of September 11, 2001.
We challenge you to look at the evidence with an open mind and make judgments. Remember, you don’t have to be an expert to sit on a jury, and you have the right to be critical of, and demand answers from the “experts.” Take the time to gather facts, and have the courage to ask for more. If you come to the same conclusion as the FBI, and don’t place him on your “most wanted” list, then have the courage to help find those responsible for the death of so many of our Brothers and Sisters. We all need to show some courage by demanding answers, justice, and fair treatment for the Ground Zero Rescue Workers!
AE911Truth
1,568 verified architectural and engineering professionals and 13,067 other supporters
have signed the petition demanding of Congress
a truly independent investigation.
The petition is open to everyone.
About Us
I. Organization
Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth (AE911Truth) is a non-profit corporation. We are a non-partisan association of architects, engineers and affiliates dedicated to exposing the falsehoods and to revealing truths about the “collapses” of the 3 World Trade Center high-rises on September 11, 2001.
Our organization is devoted to:
■ Dispelling misinformation with scientific facts and forensic evidence
■ Educating and motivating thousands of architects and engineers and the public at large
■ Procuring a truly independent 9/11 investigation with subpoena power
■ Achieving 9/11 Truth mainstream media coverage
II. Mission Statement
Our work at AE911Truth is dedicated to the victims, families and all others throughout the world affected by the tragic events of September 11, 2001 and its aftermath. We are a non-partisan association of architects, engineers, and affiliates.
Our mission is to research, compile, and disseminate scientific evidence relative to the destruction of the three World Trade Center skyscrapers, calling for a truly open and independent investigation and supporting others in the pursuit of justice.
III. Mission
We call upon Congress for a truly independent investigation with subpoena power. We believe that there is sufficient evidence to conclude that three World Trade Center buildings #1 (North Tower), #2 (South Tower), and #7 (the 47-story high-rise across Vesey St.) were destroyed not by jet impact and fires but by controlled demolition with explosives.
On September 11, 2010, the ninth anniversary, we succeeded in sending a third beam of light into the New York skyline.
Said founder Richard Gage during the press conference that evening, "The people of New York need to see the light--that a third WTC skyscraper not hit by any plane was destroyed on September 11th. They have been deceived about what happened on that terrible day. We are shining the spotlight, literally, on the fact that the official story of what happened at Ground Zero simply cannot be true and that a truly independent new investigation is needed both as a matter of national security and as the key to justice for the victims of the Twin Towers."
IV. Method
Architects & Engineers for 911 Truth focuses solely on the forensic evidence available to prove that the three World Trade Center buildings were demolished as a means of proving to Congress that a new and independent investigation is warranted.
We also want to explain the evidence to the public at large. We believe that turning the tide of public opinion is the most powerful way to convince Congress to pursue a new investigation.
Our DVD, 9/11: Blueprint for Truth, explains for the lay public why a new investigation is warranted and overdue.
9/11: Blueprint for Truth is available in four lengths: the full version is 2 hours, and three abbridged versions are available in 1-hour, 30-minute, and 10-minute presentations.
All architects, engineers, and others with competence as writers and speakers, whether they choose to sign our petition or not, are encouraged report the results of our research.
V. Founder
Richard Gage, AIA, is a San Francisco Bay Area architect and a member of the American Institute of Architects. He has been an architect for over 23 years and has worked on most types of building construction, including numerous fire-proofed, steel-framed buildings. Most recently, he worked on the construction documents for a $400M mixed-use urban project with 1.2 million square feet of retail, a parking structure, and 320,000 square feet of mid-rise office space—altogether with about 1,200 tons of steel framing. Mr. Gage became interested in researching the destruction of the WTC high-rises after hearing on the radio the startling conclusions of reluctant 9/11 researcher David Ray Griffin in 2006, which launched his own unyielding quest for the truth about 9/11. Since founding Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, Gage has presented Blueprint for Truth all over the world, and he has appeared on radio shows and television spots.
Post new comment