An open letter to Wackenhut Chairman and CEO Gary A. Sanders
On May 1st, 2007, a Wackenhut security guard violated my First Amendment rights by denying me the right to take photos from the platform of a Metromover station in downtown Miami.
I am a photojournalist who was photographing the immigration rally marching through downtown that afternoon. A little after 6 p.m., I climbed to the second level of the Arena/State Plaza Station in order to photograph the marchers below.
I was immediately accosted by a uniformed Wackenhut security guard with the name “Perez” on his name tag and a Puerto Rican flag key chain dangling from his pants pocket. Perez told me that in absolutely no circumstances would I be allowed to take photos from the Metromover station.
When I asked him why, he said “because I said so.”
When I demanded a more legitimate reason, he said it was because his superiors told him not to allow anyone to photograph from the Metromover platform.
So apparently, Mr Perez’s misunderstanding of basic constitutional rights stems from Wackenhut’s upper management, which is not surprising considering this is not the first time I’ve had a Wackenhut security guard forbid me from taking photos in public.
Perhaps before they don a uniform and firearm and interact with the public, Wackenhut security guards should be required to read and sign this document on basic photographers’ rights. Perhaps Wackenhut’s upper management might gain some enlightenment from this document.
In a nutshell, photographers are allowed to photograph anything from a public street, park, sidewalk and even public transportation station. And this means anyone carrying a camera, not just members of the media.
Mr. Perez objected to having his photo taken, telling me, “I did not give you permission to photograph me”. Again, if we are both standing in public, I have every right to photograph him. But in all honesty, I would have never photographed him had he not accosted me.
Now the usual response to the crackdown on photographers’ rights is that “9/11 changed everything”. But it hasn’t changed the First Amendment. At least not yet.
So until it does, I will continue photographing from public structures regardless of what Wackenhut security guards tell me. And I will continue photographing these guards and demanding a legitimate reason for their orders.
And I will continue documenting these instances with name, date, time and photo to show the world that these are not isolated instances, but, in fact, regular abuses of power.
After all, if there is anything sacred in this country, it is the Freedom of Expression, as you can see from the photos below.
Get all outdoorsy with Pentax's Optio WG2 and WG2-GPS
Canon's complement of compacts
How to use a grey card
We’re All Bozos On This Bus--The Red Bus to Hell
Worlds Fastest Camera
The New Sony NEX 7
Choosing your first dSLR
Photojojo iPhone Telephoto Lens review — AudioCast
Photo Accessories that Fail Security Checks
My week with Q
Studio equipment buying guide for beginners
VSCO Film Studio Review
Lessons in Lighting
The russellgraves.com Photo Minute - Truck Blinds
Photographing Children in the wedding party
Cattle Country
Creative Photo Valentine Surprise
How to Use Multiple Lights for Dramatic Portraits
Making your own flash diffuser
LR4 free presets: Faded series
Using Sync for Video in Develop
A gift of flowers: unfold your senses
On Set of "Love & Robots" the Film
My Night with Ilford Galerie Gold Silk Fibre
FOTOMOTO - Why I Left











Silhouettes & Photo Contests
Cyan, not just another color
Our 26 best photo projects of 2011
Family Ties That Bind
Animal Group Portraits
A Brief History Of Light & Photography: Part 3 of 3
A Brief History Of Light & Photography: Part 2 Of 3
Lightroom Interview: Kevin Tieskoetter
Always Dream Big
Gallery: Embedded with the Territorial Army
Getty Villa Malibu — 4 Old Faces, 1 Sunken Garden — GALLERY (6 photos)
Wildlife photography for the masses
The 110 page guide to post-processing
How much should you charge for a photograph?
Santa Pictures + Marketing for your Business



































Comments
Keep up the fight!
Good work Carlos!
I sincerely doubt you will ever hear anything from them, but if you do, let us know, okay?
Ashevillein,
I was unable to find a specific e-mail address for Mr. Sanders, so I sent this post with an explanation to Wackenhut’s general inquiry e-mail that is on their website.
I will post any response I get.
mr. carlos
they have jobs just like you sir and are following their instructions from management, which is something you do to keep your job. Im sure if this was a police officer instructing you to do this you would keep your fat mouth shut and never say a word about it. get a life sir
You should really take it up with Metro. They are the ones giving improper work instructions to their contractors.
To disagree with Mr. MacDonald, I know of cases where photographers have insisted on their rights with not only security guards, but police officers and even TSA and Homeland Security agents. You obviously didn’t even read this gentleman’s blog — he was arrested by Miami PD under similar circumstances and is currently fighting it out where these cases should be fought — IN COURT, not in the street.
To my fellow guards out there, be polite and respectful. Do your job, document as necessary. Take out your camera and snap a few photos back. Call for a supervisor and/or police if needed.
Do NOT let a muck-raker get your goat. They are occasionally annoying but as essential to liberty as the American flag, the right to assemble and the right to vote.
Good job, Carlos! I had no idea that rally had been going on. Thanks for documenting it.
I have to wonder what with all the surreptitious ways of capturing images/audio today, why guards would even bother a photographer who whips out a camera.
I spent a good amount of my time is the Air Force providing Security for or nations’ ICBM (nuclear missiles). And I can guarantee you, that if you were to start snapping your little photos of our launch sites or any other secured facility, YOU will be stopped/on the ground before you can ask “but why?”. You are NOT allowed to take pictures of certain things, even from public roads/structures.
response to – USAF Security Forces
You need to learn the actual law, not what your ballistical buddies tell you.
those facilities have to be clearly posted in signs in order for it to be protected against photography, thats the actual law.
I’m sure Carlos would see the sign and not shoot the shot.
I think if I was acosted by a security guard on public property I would place him under citizens arrest, meaning we would just wait there for the cop to come by who would do nothing anyway except arrest the guard for false arrest.
Also, – secured facility means nothing , if its visible from the sidewalk and there are no signs posted I can shoot it.
this never comes up because I highly doubt a nuclear testing facility is within view from a sidewalk. !!
And I’m sure that if there had been a legitimate reason for not being allowed to take photographs and he had been told nicely, I’m sure that he would stop nicely. Unfortunately these days, such courtesy is hard to come by.
I was searching for a contact information on how can I complain to the Wackenhut Corp. and I found this page which clear prove to me that most of the wackenhut security guards think that they are allow to mistreat others just because they think they are doing the right thing or protecting their jobs. This morning At 6am I found my self in a very shockin and envaresing position when a wackenhut security guard from the Dadeland North station approched me with a really nasty attitude and stared screaming at me and got really closed to my face and even the people that were around said that the only thing left for this security guard to do was just hit me but that it seems like he had the intentions to do so but he didn’t. When he was done screaming at me and disrespecting me in manny ways he told me just to go, to “keep going” and when i ask for his name he sarcasticly said ” you think thats going to do something” I was so upset by the disrespecfull way i was treated I was crying , my head was heading and it was gueting hard for me to breath but i catch the train to continue on my way to work but a few minutes later my dad calls my cell phone and tells me to come back to the same station that he was going to be there with the cops. I got back and the police officers made a report and the security guard told them he never screamed. but the cops told me to file another complain to wackenhut office. I’m glad i did called the police because i’m preety sure i’ve not been the first person he mistreat and thought he would get away with it. And as I read Carlos blog it makes me happy that i’m not the only person that fight for our rights. And I agree with Scott to find courtesy now a days in any place is really hard and then they are the same people that complaints that they get the same treatment from others also.
Mr. MacDonald, did you read any of the other post’s at all? The Police arent legally allowed to tell you to stop either!
it’s called the first amendment.
In fact the police have to take basic law classes in any Police Academy in America.’They should know better than the security guard as far as the First Amendment goes.
I have worked for the Wackenhut corporation in the past, and did notice a certain level of discontent, however, it would also be wise to keep in mind that all places have flaws, from back-alley, under-the-counter jobs, to a functioning member of the US senate. No one place is perfect, or free of criticism worthy events. I do, however agree, that all security and law enforcement officers, reguardless of company association, (or rank, for that matter) should be aware of every citizens rights, and suggest you start a petition to enforce such awareness. Still, there will always be a select few, especially those involved in policing the actions of others that CAN and WILL abuse the power given to them often times by the very citizens they choose to harrass.
Keep in mind that security guards are employees of the installations they are instructed to guard, just as much as they are part of the corperation they represent; that the flaw may not be within the hired corperation itself, rather the company that hired them, from whom the, perhaps misconstrued, orders orriginate.
Take care in choosing your target, before pointing the finger, if you truely hope to change things for the better.
-Best of Luck-
Carlos,
May I suggest you edit a little tighter? Keep your 1st photo (maybe crop out the platform and roof?), 2nd photo, and 6th photo. You’re only as strong as your weakest frame. Good luck and good shooting.
these are ball-bustin’ union-jerkers from way back. they use quasi-ties to ex spooks and feds to bully anyone, including ex-employees, at the behest of slime-ball corporations who don’t like dirt on their fingers. have heard numerous unattractive stories about long-term loyal guards caught in career-terminating because they inadvertently stumble on improprieties, or question outright what they perceive to be something “not-quite-right”. remember, at WACKENHUT, the spooks never sleep. they will toss-and-load your work files with garbage, or terminate for no apparent reason at all( THINK J. EDGAR HOOVER!).it was a regrettable choice i made working for them for thirteen years in MIAMI….can i have my years and reputation back,PLEASE!
[...] previously contracted with Wackenhut but they suffered too many embarrassing scandals. And they weren’t very versed in photographers rights [...]
[...] previously contracted with Wackenhut but they suffered too many embarrassing scandals. And they weren’t very versed in photographers rights [...]
[...] the county to do security on the trains. As you can see from the two photos I took below, one taken in 2007, the other taken in 2010, nothing has changed except the uniforms. 2007 [...]
USAF Security Forces #7 “You are NOT allowed to take pictures of certain things, even from public roads/structures.”
Google Earth Street View did at 47.257541, -111.277181, south of Great Falls MT. But I wouldn’t recommend climbing fences when you see signs saying “Use of deadly dorce duthorized” http://www.flickr.com/photos/williscreek/2680627918/in/photostream/
Typo: dorce = force.
IT WAS INEVITABLE THE CORPORATE ARROGANCE OF THE WACKENHUT CORPORATION WOULD BE CHALLENGED-NO MATTER WHICH AMALGAMATED MONIKER SKIRTS THEY HIDE THE NAME BEHIND. SANDERS SAW “THE GHOST OF JACOB MARLEY”,FOR SURE. THE ECONOMY SQUEEZE, THE INTERNET FACTS MADE PUBLIC-AND OF COURSE-THE FRUITS OF POISON CORRUPTION–ALL MAKE THE CASTLE TILT!the company used spooks-illegally-to jam my butt-and anything I do —–pales into insignificance compared to the civil-rights violations they have consistently engaged in over the years!ONE CEO’S TOKEN JUMP-OFF IS NOT WHAT WE SEEK-WE SEEK A PURGE AND ORDERLY SCRAP RENDERING OF THE ENTIRE CORPORATE STRUCTURE-AND IT WILL BE DONE-MAKE ABSOLUTELY NO MISTAKE ABOUT IT!
annonymous of 2008-hey-guy-you don’t have the years, the wisdom, or the agenda steam to push change in the industry! I can wager a bet you damned-sure aren’t employed by WACKENHUT by this date in 2010-maybe the NAZIS came a-knockin’ on your door already-ehhh! THESE FOLKS ARE VILE-AND YOU ARE A BILE-PRODUCING APOLOGIST FOR MANAGEMENT! There is nosaving grace working for these people-and you know better then to perpetrate such a position. I AM THE AUTHORITY WHO WAS INSIDE-THE SPY-THE GUY THEY FEAR MOST. I SAY “GIVE THEM THE BURN NOTICE”! KNOWING THAT THEY ENGAGE IN ABSOLUTE SWILL AND CORRUPTION, AND WILL NEVER CHANGE-AND NEVER RESPECT YOU-SHOULD SAY IT ALL! UNLESS YOU ARE AN ABSOLUTE MASOCHIST, DO NOT APOLOGIZE TO A RAPIST ORGANIZATION. GAWWWS-ALMIGHTY-STUPIDITY ABOUNDS!
Post new comment