Anti –Terrorism and Photo Journalists

This guest post was submitted by Samuel Bartlett who is a writer at bachelordegree.org and can be reached at bartlett.samuels@gmail.com

Following the disturbing figures released last summer that 120,000 people had been stopped and searched in the UK under Section 44 of the UK Terrorism Act (<1% ever got charged with an offence), it was refreshing to read a press release this week quoting Policing and Crime Minister, David Hanson MP as saying that the British Government “has no intention of Section 44 or Section 58A being used to stop ordinary people taking photos or to curtail legitimate journalistic activity. Guidance has been provided to all police forces advising that these powers and offences should not be used to stop innocent member of the public, tourists or responsible journalists from taking photographs.”

The British police has been heavily criticised recently for abusing their stop and search powers. Incidents where journalists have been prevented from taking “ordinary” street photographs has risen to such an extent that photojournalist Marc Vallee has set up a campaign group under the title “I´m a photographer, not a terrorist”. You can visit the site on www.photographernotaterrorist.org. “Photography is being routinely criminalised” claims Marc, and he has the support of more than 4000 photojournalists worldwide who have joined his group.

This issue though is not just confined to the UK. In New York, the Mayor’s Office has proposed that anybody taking a photograph on the streets on Manhattan should require a permit (source). In France, street photography has effectively become illegal as you can take photographs but copyright laws prevent them from ever being published. Strict rules also apply in India (source), Turkey, Australia (Australian Anti-Terrorism Act 2005) and many other countries in the allegedly free world.

It appears that public officials are equally scared of the zoom lens as they are of terrorist bombs. That’s a different story…

Comments

Anonymous
Anonymous

I am an amateur, not a professional. Unfortunately, sometimes it is the equipment you use verses your intent that can get you in trouble. I use a Nikon D200 and an SB800. Example. Last May in Berlin, a peaceful demonstration was being setup on the sidewalk in front of the Kurfürstendamm Cathedral. The group was protesting the situation in Sri Lanka and the abuse of the Tamal people. As a tourist in the city (attending a business conference) I started to photograph the event. I stood about one car length away from the police van. All the police, both uniformed or plain clothes saw me talking the pictures. The organizer of the event approached me and asked me if I was from the media. Of course I was not. I stayed there for more than an hour, trying to capture the emotions and event. Once the light had faded, I took out my flash. Should never have done that. One of the plain clothes guys pulled me aside, flashed a German "secret service" badge and asked me why I was taking so many photos. I explained that I was an amateur with no intentions to sell anything to the media. He told me the group was getting nervous because I might have detailed photos of faces of the protesters and that I should stop taking any more pictures. Not one for confrontation, especially since I am an American visiting their country I immediately turned the camera off, removed the flash and told the plain clothes guy I would leave the area.

In the US, I was threatened with arrest, destruction of my camera etc. at an fatal accident scene near my home. It was late night and I walked the half-mile to the scene past the fire police etc. Approaching the scene and behind the yellow fire scene tape standing on the public sidewalk, I started taking picture with my D200 and SB800. All I could see was a damaged vehicle and emergency vehicles. A very angry emergency uniformed person started yelling at me to stop taking pictures. I told him I was behind the line and within my rights. He threatened to have me arrested and take my camera. I told him he could not do that at which he came right to my face and started yelling. I couldn't resist popping the flash. Again not looking to spend the night in the police station, I turned without another word and walked away, the whole time taking more pictures as I walked down the road.

I now carry with me a copy of the photographers rights in the US (courtesy of http://www.krages.com/phoright.htm) and the UK info as well. Going to London in a month, always take my camera ...let's see if I can keep from getting challenged.

Anonymous
Anonymous

It's unfortunate that we hear so many of these types of stories where photographers are getting harassed in various situations.

It's important that, as photographers, we know our rights as journalists, photo journalists, artists, or even as tourists in whatever country we are in.

I agree with you that the equipment you're carrying can contribute to how the "authorities" will perceive you.

Anonymous
Anonymous

photography is an art and i don't think that it should be harassed. i also want best images for my website http://www.like2bid.com and thanks to the photographers who r capturing the best images. coz images r the only things which speaks when communication is dumb.

Anonymous
Anonymous

no teror - no warm

Post new comment

Pixiq on Facebook

Join the 8069 Pixiq fans on Facebook

Share

  • Share

Subscribe

Get weekly updates from Pixiq. Short, sweet, and always interesting.