Arizona videographer finally receives response to complaint
Now that we’re focusing on Arizona, remember Doug Hester who was threatened with arrest by a pair of security guards last April for filming the federal courthouse in Phoenix?
Well Hester filed a complaint and didn’t hear anything of it until last month, when he received a response.
In the response, Arizona U.S. Marshal David Gonzalez told Hester his allegations against the security guards were “unfounded” because Hester showed up to the courthouse with a camera “in order to provoke a response from security officers.”
That may be true but the fact that the security guards allowed themselves to be provoked doesn’t make it any less of a violation.
And it doesn’t give them the authority to lie to him about non-existent laws.
Here is an example of the exchange between Hester and the guards:
Guard 1: You’re are free to leave, go … but if I catch you videotaping the building again you will be arrested by the Phoenix Police Department.
Hester: On what charge, sir?
Guard 1: On charge of … we’ll talk to the Phoenix Police Department about it.
Guard 2: You’re not supposed to videotape any federal court building.
Hester: What law?
Guard 2: National Security Act.
Guard 1: Oklahoma City, that’s why.
Guard 2: It all comes down to Homeland Security and all that.
Guard 1: If you want to talk to our Homeland Security people, we can arrange that right now and we will detain you.
Can you fix the focus on a blurry photo after the fact?
The birth of Mirrorless Cameras
Choosing your first dSLR camera
New York City can be beautiful!
The Fujifilm Finepix X10, A Review
Choosing the Right Light Stand
Photojojo iPhone Telephoto Lens review — AudioCast
My week with Q
How To Become A Successful Photographer
"When the Wind Stopped" — poem with 4 photos
Tips for Textures
Butterflies in Motion
Cast aways - saving those photographic memories
One Man Show: My 25 Years With Digital Photography
Studio, Flash, & Available Light — Three Books Reviewed
Portrait styling: dangerous pairings
Adobe Photoshop CS6 Product Managers Interview Audiocast
A gift of flowers: unfold your senses
On Set of "Love & Robots" the Film
Ilford Galerie Gold Fibre Silk Inkjet Paper — Audiocast











Planning “National Geographic” style photo travel
Wilderness Travel 1 Rainforests – Essential Gear
Backlighting Basics
A Brief History Of Light & Photography: Part 3 of 3
A Brief History Of Light & Photography: Part 2 Of 3
What Moves You?
FIGURES IN MOTION: Decades of Evolving Personal Imagery in Photography, Part 7
Lomography Store, Austin, Texas — GALLERY
GALLERY — Up to $1,000 Reward for Cattle Rustlers
Taking your Portraiture Higher
The "Bible" of Time-Lapse Photography
Interview with Harold Davis — Closeup Maestro of Flowers & Water Drops
Interview with Steve Caplin — Photoshop Digital Artist, Commercial Illustrator, & Author
Easy technique to select, edit and sequence keywords for web
How much should you charge for a photograph?



























Comments
provoking device? hmmm…i can think of many things i could spend less money on if i was merely in the mood for provoking…
Hummm, once again the victim is at fault and the need harassing defenses are rolled out. Which means nothing will be done and the offenses will continue. If you do not know your rights you will be cowed and it you do know your rights you are provoking the officers. We will ignore that knowing and using ones rights should not be looked upon as provocation.
Government conjures fictional people called corporations.
So why can’t it conjure fictional laws?
Whatever it takes to keep the little people in line is “legal.”
http://legaltimes.typepad.com/blt/2009/01/us-marshals-chauffeured-broadc...
Our government is criminal. Criminals don’t like to be photographed or videotaped. 9-11 and Oklahoma City were both inside jobs. 9-11 was Israel and OK City… CIA? Don’t matter, our government is run by Israeli citizens, look at the White House with Israeli Mossad agent Rahm Emanuel controlling Barry Soetoro and the Teleprompters.
Post new comment