At Least Three Journalists Arrested During Occupy Wall Street Raid

CBS helicopter prevented from reaching air space

New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg claims he simply wanted to clean Zuccotti Park before allowing Occupy Wall Street activists to return.

The truth is, his police department embarked on a blistering blitzkrieg under the cover of darkness early Tuesday morning, smashing heads and busting faces while arresting more than 70 people, including at least two reporters.

They also ripped the credentials off countless other journalists while preventing a CBS helicopter from covering the roundup from above.

While the NYPD did all it could to prevent the raid from being documented, hundreds of activists described the scene via Twitter, including one who tweeted the above video, which shows cops swinging batons as they make mass arrests.

Here is a collection of tweets describing the attempted media blackout, including this one from New York Times reporter Brian Stelter.

I'm w/ a NY Post reporter who says he was roughed up by riot police as Zuccotti was cleared. He thinks violence was "completely deliberate."

And this one from NY1Education Reporter Lindsey Christ:

Reporters/photogs being thrown to ground and pushed to wall if they get in front of the wrong officer. Other officers calm and polite.

The two reporters arrested were Jared Malsin, who has written for the New York Times, and Julie Walker, who was on assignment for NPR.

Both have tweeted that they've been released. Malsin said he was charged with disorderly conduct.

Malsin also said that an AFP photojournalist was arrested.

The New York City Department of Transportation, which usually has an online camera turned on in that area, had it turned off.

surveillance.jpg

New York City Councilman Ydanis Rodriguez was also arrested and was seen being led away with a bloodied head.

Bloomberg issued a statement this morning saying he authorized the raid in the name of public safety.

Occupy Wall Street activists vowed they will continue resisting. Moments ago, they sent out the following press release:

New York, NY — We are a global movement that is reclaiming our humanity and our future. We have stepped into a revitalizing civic process, realizing that we cannot fix our crises isolated from one another. We need collective action, and we need civic space. We are creating that civic space.

To occupy is to embody the spirit of liberation that we wish to manifest in our society. It is to exercise our freedom to assemble. We are creating space for community, values, ideas, and a level of meaningful dialogue that is absent in the present discourse.

Liberated space is breaking free of isolation, breaking down the walls that literally and figuratively separate us from one another. It is a new focus on community, trust, love and hope. We occupy to create a vision of equality, liberty and social justice onto the blank paving stones of public parks, in the silent hallways of abandoned schools, banks, and beyond.

Public space plays a crucial role in this civic process and encourages open, transparent organizing in our movement. As we have seen in Liberty Square, outdoor space invites people to listen, speak, share, learn, and act.

Last night, billionaire Michael Bloomberg sent a massive police force to evict members of the public from Liberty Square—home of Occupy Wall Street for the past two months. People who were part of a dynamic civic process were beaten and pepper-sprayed, their personal property destroyed.

Supporters of this rapidly growing movement were mobilized in the middle of the night, making phone calls, taking the streets en masse, and planning next steps. Americans and people around the world are appalled at Bloomberg's treatment of people who peacefully assemble.

We are appalled, but not deterred. Liberty Square was dispersed, but its spirit not defeated. Today we are stronger than we were yesterday. Tomorrow we will be stronger still. We are breaking free of the fear that constricts and confines us. We occupy to liberate.

We move forward in the grand tradition of the transformative social movements that have defined American history. We stand on the shoulders of those who have struggled before us, and we pick up where others have left off. We are creating a better society for us all.

Occupy Wall Street has renewed a sense of hope. It has revived a belief in community and awakened a revolutionary spirit too long silenced.

Join us as we liberate space and build a movement. 9 a.m. Tuesday morning at Sixth Avenue and Canal we continue.

In the past, whether it is New York City or Oakland or the countless other cities in between with Occupy encampments, militarized police crackdowns like this tend to bolster support for the movement.

That, of course, depends on what pops up on Youtube in the next 24 hours.

UPDATE: A court order apparently authorizes the activists back into Zuccotti Park.

The National Lawyers Guild says it has obtained a court order that allows Occupy Wall St. protesters to return with tents to a New York City park.

The guild says the injunction prevents the city from enforcing park rules on Occupy Wall Street protesters.

Mayor Michael Bloomberg says the city knew about the court order but has not seen it. He says the city plans to go court immediately.

Zuccotti Park was cleared overnight so that crews could clean it. Bloomberg says that was done “to reduce the risk of confrontation.”

Comments

Giving local police the power to restrict air space, especially for news worthy events, just doesn't seem quite legal to me. /shrug

Police no longer uphold the law, but have become the law. A sad state of affairs.

Judge Dredd was a fun comic book. It is less so when NYPD yells "I am...da law!"

Raging Whiteshirt Guy didn't care about any temporary restraining order this morning, that's for sure.

(http://inothernews.tumblr.com/post/12855486179/mindbabies-hahahahahaha-i...)

RobertB, you are right and that is the way it should be.

The CCTV camera was down, huh? How god-damned convenient.

Pity someone didn't "accidentally" reconnect it.

Just checked with the FAA website. No TFRs were in effect in New York during the raid time. Although there is a disclaimer that the list may not be complete and not to use it for flight planning.

If anyone is interested here is a link to the FAA and the TFR policies.

http://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/rgAdvisoryCircular.nsf/list/AC%2091-63C/$FILE/AC91-63C.pdf

The helicopter thing is a complete red herring; the FAA have exclusive control over airspace over the entire nation. Local PDs have zero authority to 'prevent' access to airspace themselves. As BeJay points out, only the FAA have such authority. If a TFR wasn't in place and NOTAMed, access was not prevented.

The FAA will usually cooperate quickly with such TFR requests from local LE. But they will equally quickly act to squash any local LE who try to usurp their authority by issuing, or pretending to have the authority to issue, local restrictions. One nation, one airspace, one regulator.

Mike

According to the CBS news desk, the NYPD asked them to leave, and they did.

The FAA may control airspace, but the NYPD controls media passes. The FAA can't make the NYPD give CBS media access back for stories if they decide to yank it when CBS doesn't do what they want.

You may be technically right, but effectively it doesn't matter.

Plus, the NYPD have boasted of their ability to shoot down a light aircraft. If you're flying a news helicopter, and someone with anti-aircraft capability accuses you of being present unlawfully and orders you to depart immediately or else, odds are you don't stick around to find out whether that or else is anti-aircraft fire or just a traffic ticket.

"The truth is, his police department embarked on a blistering blitzkrieg under the cover of darkness early Tuesday morning, smashing heads and busting faces while arresting more than 70 people, including at least two reporters."

Complete bullshit.

I watched the clearing of the park last night live on the Occupy Wall Street livestream. The police stood around for several hours while they used loudspeakers to give notice that people have to leave. While they did this, the protesters screamed and and yelled insults at the police. There was no mass charge. When (again after several hours) the police finally moved in to clear out the park, the ones that remained were the people looking for a confrontation with the police.

JdL

When ... the police finally moved in to clear out the park, the ones that remained were the people looking for a confrontation with the police.

The cops had no moral authority to order anybody to leave. It's the COPS who don't belong there. Miserable pathetic thugs doing the bidding of billionaires. If anybody's heads should have been busted, it was not the protesters'. I predict that a decisive turn-around will come soon, when people finally get fed up with being pushed around by government goons.

I suggest that you read Glenn Greenwald's new book, "With Liberty and Justice for Some". But you won't, will you? You'd rather stick to being a hand-maiden to the oligarchs while you pretend you're serving society as a whole. That fantasy may sell to fellow thug cops, but not to an informed citizenry.

I have to challenge one of your assumptions. Moral authority has ZERO bearing on LEGAL authority.

Contrary to popular myth this is not technically a PUBLIC park, it is privately owned and the rules can be changed for its use by the owners.

I would further challenge the authority of the courts to overrule the property owners if they want the park cleared. This is from a legal perspective extremely tricky for the protestors, they can't claim ANY right of ownership. I can't remember if tents/camping and such were allowed by the rules prior to their arrival, I didn't think so, if not then they were already breaking the law and deserved to be arrested. Sorry, do the crime do the time. Your political perspective has no bearing on it to me and it shouldn't matter to anyone else who claims to be fair and honest.

While I cannot agree with police paying special attention to photogs that doesn't mean that clearing out the park was wrong in the first place.

Considering the other media reports I've seen, the park *DESPERATELY* needed a cleaning and the protestors were not even close to doing an adequate job.

Near as I can tell they lack legal authority for being there and do not have the proper permits that everyone else is expected to get for large gatherings. I'm sorry but such utter disregard does not help push their case..

And this is what happens when someone is actually talking to you.

Moral authority? The protesters don't have the moral or legal authority of occupy a private venue and deny others the ability to use or enjoy it.

There are a lot of instances where photographers don't have the moral authority to stick a camera in someone's face but everyone here is quick to point out that they have a legal right to do it so it's okay.

I suggest you read a book about logical thinking.

You're not really correct, as the park is a Privately-Owned-Public-Space, not a true private venue.

http://www.nyc.gov/html/dcp/html/priv/priv.shtml

As they weren't charging admission or forcing other people out (to the contrary, OWS /wants/ people there) it can't logically be said that they were denying other people the /use/ of the park. "Enjoy" is too subjective and vague to even address.

I am really correct.. It is not a private venue, TRUE, it however is not a public venue either, they are required to have the park open 24-hours and to care for it, they are also FREE to set rules, which they have. Those rules say no tents, tarps, sleeping bags, and such.

You can argue all you want about them not denying people access, on the contrary, large sections of the park were being continuously used and effectively denied their use. Would you take your family to a nice day at the park? I thought not..

This park was never designed for or meant to be an urban campground. And while the people are certainly free to protest they don't get to do whatever they want to do because they feel justified.

As a poster brought up in another post, the OWS folks have made a major blunder, they have allowed unstable crazy people to be involved and interact with the media and those people get rowdy with photogs, news persons, and cops. And THEY get the publicity and make the movement look bad. The movement can claim they are the small minority but those people will be used to paint the whole movement. This makes it harder for those sympathetic to the movement to fully support it and they don't see the "leaders" doing anything effective to reign it in, which reads as at least tacit approval.

I was replying to Johnny Law, you idiot. That's why it's nested under his message, not yours. He said:

"The protesters don't have the moral or legal authority of occupy a private venue and deny others the ability to use or enjoy it."

And as I pointed out, no one was outright DENIED access to the entire park, and subjective things like "enjoy" aren't even in play... such as...

"Would you take your family to a nice day at the park?"

Yeah, lots of people were doing that. I would. So apparently you thought wrong.

Then again, you can't even keep straight who's replying to who, so I'm not surprised.

JL you should read a book about photography. We don't "stick a camera in someone's face" Even the closest photo are usually taken from several feet away.

The Mayor used the color of law to deny the press access to a news story, a cbs chopper was denied access, reporters were arrested and badges were ripped off. That in itself is a federal crime.
Your opinion that the police were nice have NO relevance it has nothing to do with the unlawful acts of the Mayor and his thugs.

This coming from a biased coward who hides behind his tin badge and internet pseudonym.

Personal attacks so soon? Try again. Please stay on topic.

Talk about conflicted. What is a person to do when they despise both the police and the OWS people?

Sit back and enjoy the show?
:)

What do you have against Occupy protesters?

I'll second that. How can anybody be against OWS? They are protesting tyrannical plutocrats that want absolute power and want to own everything including you. They want your entire essence as a person. They want king like absolute power. They are against America, the Bill of Rights, freedom and even the essence of what a person is. They are diametrically opposed to the concepts of the republic the founders gave us. But don't take my word for it, let's hear it from the horses mouth.

"In our dream, we have limitless resources, and the people yield themselves with perfect docility to our molding hand. The present educational conventions fade from our minds; and, unhampered by tradition, we work our own good will upon a grateful and responsive folk. We shall not try to make these people or any of their children into philosophers or men of learning or science. We are not to raise up from among them authors, orators, poets, or men of letters. We shall not search for embryo great artists, painters, musicians. Nor will we cherish even the humbler ambition to raise up from among them lawyers, doctors, preachers, politicians, statesmen, of whom we now have ample supply."
Rockefeller Foundation Director of Charity, Frederick Gates

A person can not "yield themselves with perfect docility to our molding hand" and remain a person.

If that were true they should be in Washington not Wall Street.

Ice Trey,

They alomost were!! One step away. We were one step away from King Nelson I. Robber-baron plutocrats could not be elected so they had to find a way to take over without being elected... from the failed business plot against FDR which would have virtually replaced the president with the Secretary of General Affairs, to the JFK assassination placing Johnson/Rockefeller in charge, to the 2 failed assassination attempts against President Ford after the Rockefeller amendment oops I mean the 25th amendment to the Constitution was passed. If either one of the Ford assassination attempts were successful Nelson Rockefeller would have been President.
Now imagine if you dare, this being enforced with the full power of the military.

In our dream, we have limitless resources, and the people yield themselves with perfect docility to our molding hand. The present educational conventions fade from our minds; and, unhampered by tradition, we work our own good will upon a grateful and responsive folk. We shall not try to make these people or any of their children into philosophers or men of learning or science. We are not to raise up from among them authors, orators, poets, or men of letters. We shall not search for embryo great artists, painters, musicians. Nor will we cherish even the humbler ambition to raise up from among them lawyers, doctors, preachers, politicians, statesmen, of whom we now have ample supply."
Rockefeller Foundation Director of Charity, Frederick Gates,

By "they" I meant the protestors.

Wow, virtually none of what's listed there about OWS is actually true. Whole thing needs a big [citation needed] applied.

That would be "vitality" (vitally, you semi-literate Google Savant!) important to backing up the assertions. XD

Good. Maybe this nonsense will be over soon and the protesters can go be productive members of society.

As I see it, JL, these people are being productive members of society. By highlighting the wrongs that need to be corrected they are doing a public service.

"Crime spree base?" Really?

I suppose we shouldn't expect much better from a (wanna-be) corrections thug.

Looks like you have something to hide, Boyce. I've never seen Carlos actually moderate out a comment before. Cut a little too close to home?

Well now I wonder if it's Carlos deleting comments or Pixiq doing it for him.

But then it looks like a certain teabagger couldn't take having a "broad-brush" applied to himself like he did to OWS and he deleted his account...

I'm thinking if personal hygiene and cleaning up litter was part of their protest, they'd find a lot more acceptance of their being there.

Post new comment

Pixiq on Facebook

Join the 10085 Pixiq fans on Facebook

Share

  • Share

Subscribe

Get weekly updates from Pixiq. Short, sweet, and always interesting.