NJ mayor orders journalists out of public meeting while allowing other journalist to stay
Even when cops are trying to gain the public’s sympathy, they are not immune from trampling on the First Amendment rights of the press.
Take the latest case from Atlantic City where hundreds of cops packed into a meeting to show support for five officers who are being laid off.
According to the Press of Atlantic City, a pair of journalists were ordered to leave by Mayor John McMenamin for reasons that are not clear.
Emotions ran high at Tuesday’s meeting and at one point, McMenamin told a Press of Atlantic City reporter and photographer to leave the meeting, while allowing another newspaper photographer to stay. The Press staff refused, citing their right to be at a public meeting.
Police Chief Thomas Conroy asked McMenamin if he wanted to sign a criminal complaint against them. McMenamin declined to sign.
As chief of police, Conroy should have defended the journalists’ right to be at the public meeting rather than offer to sign a criminal complaint against them.
Canon's complement of compacts
Three delicious new lenses from Canon
How to use a grey card
We’re All Bozos On This Bus--The Red Bus to Hell
Worlds Fastest Camera
The New Sony NEX 7
Choosing your first dSLR
Photojojo iPhone Telephoto Lens review — AudioCast
Photo Accessories that Fail Security Checks
My week with Q
Studio equipment buying guide for beginners
VSCO Film Studio Review
Lessons in Lighting
The russellgraves.com Photo Minute - Truck Blinds
Cattle Country
Creative Photo Valentine Surprise
How to Use Multiple Lights for Dramatic Portraits
Making your own flash diffuser
LR4 free presets: Faded series
Using Sync for Video in Develop
A gift of flowers: unfold your senses
On Set of "Love & Robots" the Film
My Night with Ilford Galerie Gold Silk Fibre
FOTOMOTO - Why I Left











Silhouettes & Photo Contests
Cyan, not just another color
Our 26 best photo projects of 2011
Family Ties That Bind
Animal Group Portraits
A Brief History Of Light & Photography: Part 3 of 3
A Brief History Of Light & Photography: Part 2 Of 3
Lightroom Interview: Kevin Tieskoetter
Always Dream Big
Getty Villa Malibu — 4 Old Faces, 1 Sunken Garden — GALLERY (6 photos)
GALLERY — Walt Disney Concert Hall — 5 Photos
Wildlife photography for the masses
The 110 page guide to post-processing
How much should you charge for a photograph?
Santa Pictures + Marketing for your Business





























Comments
“You want I should throw these clowns in the clink, boss?”
Criminy.
Michaelk42´s last blog ..Hard to let go
It has happened to me too. In Alabama, we have a sunshine law, not that the police enforce it.
http://www.ago.state.al.us/documents/open_meeting.pdf
The article says that the press staff refused to leave the meeting. Were they actually kicked out or did the mayor TRY to have them removed?
Rob´s last blog ..San Diego Reader Story: We Don’t Want You Taking Pictures
Hey look at that. PINAC took best over all blog. Sweet. I didn’t think some silly pizza blog would really take over. It does seem a little odd though because PINAC did not take any of the other categorys even though it was in first place for a while in 3 of them. Congrats Carlos and keep up the good work.
Link to winners
http://interactive.sun-sentinel.com/community/ssblogcontest/index-win.php
The mayor woke up at the last minute and realized that “criminal complaint” = “triple damages for violating a fundamental civil right.”
Don’t fuck with people who buy paper by the truckload and ink by the barrel.
So, 500 cops show up to protest 5 cops being laid off?
I know with a BA in journalism I’m not supposed to be good at math — and I’m not — but by my calculations, if just those officers who actually showed up would donate a mere 1% of their salaries, they could support those who have been pink-slipped.
No doubt they have at least 4,500 supporting officers who couldn’t attend… if they all contributed, it would take just 0.1% of their paychecks.
But no, it’s much easier to strongarm the public out of their money, instead.
Can you say “prior restraint”?
Post new comment