Commanding NYPD Cops Abusing Powers More Than Rank And File Cops In Protest
Occupy Wall Street Protest: Day 10
In what may be a glaring example of the class divisions being played out during the Occupy Wall Street protests, commanding New York City police officers are abusing their powers more than the rank and file officers.
“You would think it would be the other way around,” said activist Patrick Bruner in a telephone interview with Photography is Not a Crime Monday. “You would think it would be the cops with the least experience.”
“In almost every instance of police brutality we’ve seen, it is the white-collared supervisors doing the abusing. The blue shirt police officers have mostly been on our side.”
The videos confirm his statements.
Bruner, one of the spokespeople for the group, also said that commanding officers have been targeting videographers and photographers.
“We’re not sure if the superior officers have an order or at least a tactical understanding to eliminate any ability for us to get the word out, but it’s obvious that they are specifically targeting the people running our live stream,” he said.
On Saturday, right before the protesters began their march from Zuccotti Park to Union Square, police officers arrested two videographers who were live streaming for their site.
A white-shirted supervisor initiated those arrests, he said.
The Occupy Wall Street site also stated they “received unconfirmed reports that over one hundred blue-collar police refused to come into work in solidarity with our movement.”
Anthony Bologna
The most obvious incident of supervisory police abuse so far was committed by NYPD Deputy Inspector Anthony Bologna, a 29-year veteran caught on video pepper spraying a pair of women who were already detained and not resisting (watch the above video).
The women were standing behind an orange barricade held in place by blue-uniformed officers when Bologna snuck up behind the officers and shot a stream of pepper spray towards the women before disappearing into the crowd again.
The spray even struck at least two of the blue-uniformed officers, who were pretty upset at him.
“They did not look happy,” said David, a photographer who was standing on the outside of the barrier, who asked that his last name not be used when contacted today by PINAC.
“They yelled his name out after he walked away. They looked upset and were rubbing their eyes.
“They looked as if they wanted to help the women who had gotten sprayed but they couldn’t because they had to keep holding the fence.”
In fact, the white-shirted supervisors would reach over the barricades and grab whomever they thought was a leader in the group and pull them out to arrest them, he said.
David, who lives in the city, said he has been photographing the protests for four days and agreed that it was the white-shirted supervisors abusing their powers.
“I would stand and talk to some of the officers in blue and thank them for protecting us,” he said. “They seemed open to what we were doing and appreciated it.
“But the cops in the white shirts were the ones giving the orders, yelling into the microphones, telling them who to arrest.”

It was David who first identified Bologna by comparing videos and zooming in on his name tag, then posting his findings on his website.
After that, the hacker group Anonymous exposed his full identity, including his addresses and the fact that he was listed in a civil suit in 2005.
The Guardian then dug deeper and discovered that the lawsuit stems from the 2004 Republican National Convention in which he was accused of abusing his power by arresting protesters with no due cause.
Bologna, who was profiled in a 2005 Villager article, was described as an honest cop who worked his way up the ranks, including a stint in internal affairs.
In February 1993 he began working as an internal investigator in the chief of patrol’s office. “It was my first taste of internal investigation and it opened my eyes to the darker side of police work,” Bologna said.
“You read in the papers about cops doing things that you can’t believe because you think everybody’s like you.”
It's hard to imagine any of those cops ever received the exposure Bologna is currently receiving.
Arrested for video recording
David also photographed police leading away a handcuffed woman who was arrested for video recording.
Marisa Holmes was recording a man who was kneeling in the street in front of the bank that had repossessed his parents’ home.
Robert Stephens, a law student, was yelling his story, telling the cops to arrest him. He would place his hands on his head and behind his back, just waiting for them to handcuff him.
But for more than two minutes, groups of blue-uniformed cops would walk by him, ignoring him as hordes of protesters would photograph and record him.
It was finally a white-shirted cop – who looks a lot like Bologna – who grabs his arm, initiating the arrest.
Then, another white-shirted cop wearing a red jacket gets into Holmes face, ordering her away, telling her to get off the street.
But the street was already blocked off to traffic with barricades, said David.
Holmes moved in to get closer to Stephen’s arrest when the supervisor with the red jacket grabbed her. She was able to hand off her camera to another protester, who continued recording.
David snapped this photo as she was being led away.

Boston Review reporter also gets pepper sprayed
Jeanne Mansfield, a writer for the Boston Review, said she got caught up in the melee before the Bologna incident and video recorded even more aggressive acts from the white-shirted cops, including them pulling people from behind the corral to arrest them.
She also confirms that it is the white-shirted cops escalating the tensions.
A new group of police officers arrives in white shirts, as opposed to dark blue. These guys are completely undiscerning in their aggression. If someone gets in their way, they shove them headfirst into the nearest parked car, at which point the officers are immediately surrounded by camera phones and shouts of “Shame! Shame!”
Up until this point, Frank and I have managed to stay ahead of the nets, but as we hit what I think is 12th Street, they’ve caught up. The blue-shirts aren’t being too forceful, so we manage to run free, but stay behind to see what happens. Then things go nuts.
The white-shirted cops are shouting at us to get off the street as they corral us onto the sidewalk. One African American man gets on the curb but refuses to be pushed up against the wall of the building; they throw him into the street, and five cops tackle him. As he’s being cuffed, a white kid with a video camera asks him “What’s your name?! What’s your name?!” One of the blue-shirted cops thinks he’s too close and gives him a little shove. A white-shirt sees this, grabs the kid and without hesitation billy-clubs him in the stomach.
Here is her video.
More reports of photographers getting arrested
Gothamist has also been reporting on the arrests of photographers.
Times' Up! photographer Barbara Ross tells us that as she was filming Saturday's march down Broadway to Union Square, a white-shirted NYPD officer repeatedly warned her that she would be arrested unless she started marching with the demonstrators. "I was standing off to the side so I could document what was going on—you couldn't really see much from within the group," Ross says, "And he kept saying, 'You either join them or I'll arrest you.' I wasn't blocking traffic or harming anything, it was obvious it was because I was holding a camera."
Jim Kiernan, who was shooting Saturday's protests for Gothamist, said that NYPD officers were "definitely" zeroing in on anyone with a camera. At around 12th Street and Fifth Avenue, Kiernan saw a large black SUV pull up next to a few police supervisors. "It was Ray Kelly. He rolled down his window and I had a perfect shot but I knew if I pointed my camera at him I'd get arrested on the spot." Moments later, "a videographer who I had seen all day, who didn't seem to be part of the protest was arrested. One officer took her camera, another cuffed her," Kiernan said. "A few seconds later, another photographer next to her gets arrested—no provocation whatsoever. That's when I decided I was done for the day."
Below are even more videos that show the white-shirted cops as the aggressors. In the second video, the action begins right after 4:15.
In some of the videos, there is a man walking around in a full suit with blondish hair and a mustache that appears to be calling the shots. I wonder who he is.
There is also a group of protesters gathering in Pershing Square in Los Angeles with a live stream.
Can you fix the focus on a blurry photo after the fact?
The birth of Mirrorless Cameras
Choosing your first dSLR camera
New York City can be beautiful!
The Fujifilm Finepix X10, A Review
Choosing the Right Light Stand
Photojojo iPhone Telephoto Lens review — AudioCast
My week with Q
How To Become A Successful Photographer
"When the Wind Stopped" — poem with 4 photos
Tips for Textures
Butterflies in Motion
Cast aways - saving those photographic memories
One Man Show: My 25 Years With Digital Photography
Studio, Flash, & Available Light — Three Books Reviewed
Portrait styling: dangerous pairings
Adobe Photoshop CS6 Product Managers Interview Audiocast
A gift of flowers: unfold your senses
On Set of "Love & Robots" the Film
Ilford Galerie Gold Fibre Silk Inkjet Paper — Audiocast











Planning “National Geographic” style photo travel
Wilderness Travel 1 Rainforests – Essential Gear
Backlighting Basics
A Brief History Of Light & Photography: Part 3 of 3
A Brief History Of Light & Photography: Part 2 Of 3
What Moves You?
FIGURES IN MOTION: Decades of Evolving Personal Imagery in Photography, Part 7
Lomography Store, Austin, Texas — GALLERY
GALLERY — Up to $1,000 Reward for Cattle Rustlers
eyePhone: The eBook for iPhone Photographers
Taking your Portraiture Higher
Interview with Harold Davis — Closeup Maestro of Flowers & Water Drops
Interview with Steve Caplin — Photoshop Digital Artist, Commercial Illustrator, & Author
Easy technique to select, edit and sequence keywords for web
How much should you charge for a photograph?


































Comments
Marisa Holmes was told to get off the street. She didn't. Then moved closer to the arrest and got arrested herself. Arrested for video recording? Hardly... arrested for being a dumb-ass.
The street was blocked off, making it open for pedestrians.
I've never heard of a permit for being on a closed street. Do tell me where I can get one. I wouldn't want to get arrested for a non-crime next time I happen to enter a CLOSED street.
One has to wonder these days if the troll is on the dole.
The Pentagon has purchased a pioneering software programme that creates fake identities on social media websites, in an attempt to infiltrate and influence...
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/social-media/8389577/Pentagon-buys...
I agree, they were telling everyone to get out of the street. She wasn't being singled out just for video recording. It's clearer in this other version of the same incident:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9byOpunXWBw
With respect to the MACEing of the women behind the orange barrier, the stakes must be raised. NYPD will never do anything. I believe - although not a lawyer, that Under the Color of Law would apply.
"Color of law refers to an appearance of legal power to act but which may operate in violation of law. For example, though a police officer acts with the "color of law" authority to arrest someone, if such an arrest is made without probable cause the arrest may actually be in violation of law. In other words, just because something is done with the "color of law", that does not mean that the action was lawful. When police act outside their lawful authority and violate the civil rights of a citizen, the FBI is tasked with investigating"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Color_%28law%29
This should be reported to the FBI as its in violation of federal law.
http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/investigate/civilrights/color_of_law
The FBI is the lead federal agency for investigating color of law abuses, which include acts carried out by government officials operating both within and beyond the limits of their lawful authority. Off-duty conduct may be covered if the perpetrator asserted his or her official status in some way.
During 2009, the FBI investigated 385 color of law cases. Most of these crimes fall into five broad areas:
* Excessive force;
* Sexual assaults;
* False arrest and fabrication of evidence;
* Deprivation of property; and
* Failure to keep from harm.
Excessive force: In making arrests, maintaining order, and defending life, law enforcement officers are allowed to use whatever force is "reasonably" necessary. The breadth and scope of the use of force is vast—from just the physical presence of the officer…to the use of deadly force. Violations of federal law occur when it can be shown that the force used was willfully "unreasonable" or "excessive."
Sexual assaults by officials acting under color of law can happen in jails, during traffic stops, or in other settings where officials might use their position of authority to coerce an individual into sexual compliance. The compliance is generally gained because of a threat of an official action against the person if he or she doesn’t comply.
False arrest and fabrication of evidence: The Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution guarantees the right against unreasonable searches or seizures. A law enforcement official using authority provided under the color of law is allowed to stop individuals and, under certain circumstances, to search them and retain their property. It is in the abuse of that discretionary power—such as an unlawful detention or illegal confiscation of property—that a violation of a person's civil rights may occur.
Fabricating evidence against or falsely arresting an individual also violates the color of law statute, taking away the person’s rights of due process and unreasonable seizure. In the case of deprivation of property, the color of law statute would be violated by unlawfully obtaining or maintaining a person’s property, which oversteps or misapplies the official’s authority.
The Fourteenth Amendment secures the right to due process; the Eighth Amendment prohibits the use of cruel and unusual punishment. During an arrest or detention, these rights can be violated by the use of force amounting to punishment (summary judgment). The person accused of a crime must be allowed the opportunity to have a trial and should not be subjected to punishment without having been afforded the opportunity of the legal process.
Failure to keep from harm: The public counts on its law enforcement officials to protect local communities. If it’s shown that an official willfully failed to keep an individual from harm, that official could be in violation of the color of law statute.
Filing a Complaint
To file a color of law complaint, contact your local FBI office by telephone, in writing, or in person. The following information should be provided:
* All identifying information for the victim(s);
* As much identifying information as possible for the subject(s), including position, rank, and agency employed;
* Date and time of incident;
* Location of incident;
* Names, addresses, and telephone numbers of any witness(es);
* A complete chronology of events; and
* Any report numbers and charges with respect to the incident.
You may also contact the United States Attorney's Office in your district or send a written complaint to:
Assistant Attorney General
Civil Rights Division
Criminal Section
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, Northwest
Washington, DC 20530
FBI investigations vary in length. Once our investigation is complete, we forward the findings to the U.S. Attorney’s Office within the local jurisdiction and to the U.S. Department of Justice in Washington, D.C., which decide whether or not to proceed toward prosecution and handle any prosecutions that follow.
Riot by cop.
New York is an open-air Stanford Prison Experiment writ large.
Remember, during the short-lived Experiment about 1/3 of the randomly chosen college students role-playing prison guards showed immediate sadistic tendencies.
Reading the First Circuit's decision in Glik it is important to note the Court's comments that "The First Amendment right to gather news is, as the Court has often noted, not one that inures solely to the benefit of the news media; rather, the public's right of access to information is coextensive with that of the press." "Moreover, changes in technology and society have made the lines between private citizen and journalist exceedingly difficult to draw. The proliferation of electronic devices with video-recording capability means that many of our images of current events come from bystanders with a ready cell phone or digital camera rather than a traditional film crew, and news stories are now just as likely to be broken by a blogger at her computer as a reporter at a major newspaper. Such developments make clear why the news-gathering protections of the First Amendment cannot turn on professional credentials or status."
Congress shall make no law. That order was extended to the states as well. And if no law may be created to abridge the freedom of the press, then as such, no requirements can be made by government to require things such as credentials or press pass. It would stand to reason that if they can't pass any law or rule to infringe on freedom of the press, they can't pass any law or rule on who can become "the press" Because if they are able to decide who can be press, they can deny that right to every single person in america. Plain and simple Freedom of the Press is an individual right.
The Founders are not going to create a first amendment stating 5 rights that the government better not tread on and then be like - oh only speech, assembly, religion and petitioning are for individuals, the press you have to be a major news outlet for that right to apply. Don't forget, we didn't have fox, msnbc, cbs and all those other news outlets back then. Contrary to what many people believe, freedom of the press doesn't apply to those major outlets because those outlets didn't exist.
The NYPD is what I fear most in NYC. This shows why they need to be feared. They are out of control on a lot of things.
Now that NYPD Commissioner Kelly has revealed that the NYPD has the ability to take down a plane I also fear flying around NYC. No telling when they will use that ability.
This actually shows that they fear us. They would not go to great lengths to arrest people and get these cameras off the street if they didn't fear the power that we the people have over them.
them old boys in the white shirts thought they was back in hippie whoopin' days. they forgot about cameras.
My guess for the brutal take down is they are trying to weed out and identify who the Anonymous supporters are.
I HOPE WE ALL LEARNED SOMETHING TODAY, ALL PROTESTORS SHOULD CARRY PEPPERSPRAY AND WEAR MASKS AND GOGGLES.
AT 8:05 DUALWIELDING 7 OUNCE BOTTLES OF PEPPER SPRAY AT THE LARGE GROUP OF GASTAPO WOULD HAVE DONE WONDERS...
Post new comment