Pixiq

This is really tragic, because he's usually so diligent about informing them since he beat the previous absurd charge. He's now facing an indictment that really goes more to the core purpose of the statute rather than an arcane intepretation.

Still, I wonder if the Glick case can help him here, particularly the language about 'recording public officials in the course of their duties'.

The notification requirement is so vague. Does the cop have to acknowledge. If recording a large group, for instance, does one constantly have to shout out "I am recording audio" just in case a new cop joins the fray? All it takes is one cop to say they were not informed and the charges start up again.

The notification requirement is so vague. Does the cop have to acknowledge. If recording a large group, for instance, does one constantly have to shout out "I am recording audio" just in case a new cop joins the fray? All it takes is one cop to say they were not informed and the charges start up again.

I have one question.. Was he IN NH? If not then what state was he in? This could easily negate NH having a case since he can't be expected to follow NH law in another state..

Its unfortunate but he might be toast on this one..

As a side note we might actually get some case law as to what laws are ACTUALLY in effect for interstate wiretapping.. This would be particularly true if he was in a state that required only single party consent.. Keeping in mind that the federal law is single party consent..

“This is a head hunt against those who are trying to hold them accountable,” he said.

Well of course it is. Everyone knows that you have to bow to a cops authority and they are above accountability. Sheesh!

So if a surveillance cam was recording, would producing that vid also be illegal? How did the balance of power get so skewed in favor of "THEM" vs. We the People?

The law was made partially for this very reason. He's in trouble this time.

The New Hampshire State Motto is "Live Free Or Die." Looks like some of them need reminding from time to time.

When it starts to sound hopeless, we should remind ourselves of the Fully Informed Jury Association and do what we can to get the word out to potential New Hampshire juries. If local newspapers are flooded with letters to the editor from concerned patriots all over the country...I'm willing to write one if someone could direct me to the appropriate newspaper(s).

On the other hand, newspapers can ignore these letters if they choose, in which case the Free Staters already living in New Hampshire could get together and take up this good cause.

There's a conflict of interest. The plaintiff, judge, & prosecutor all work for the so called "state".

The Following is my opinion. openly recording police in public is one thing, even a hidden camera in public should not be illegal.
The Legislature of the state of New Hampshire who were elected by the people of New Hampshire has made it a crime to secretly record phone conversations. The Intent of the people of the state of New Hampshire is to make it illegal to record phone conversations. This is what this person did. I watched the video and I knew this was coming.
In my opinion from reading his stated beliefs this Guy is a anarchist, he has no respect for our system of government. HE uses the constitution to suit him, but ultimately his stated goal is to end our system, end our republican form of Democracy and replace it with anarchocapitalism. The Enemy of my Enemy is my friend. His work to record police corruption is one thing, his ultimate goal to destroy our Constitution and create a world of Warlords and Serfs is another.
He hates the fact that the people have chosen a form of Government he does not like. Ultimately he has no respect for the people of New Hampshire and there desire to have a government.

Don't know about this case, but you all need to watch this video to see how one sided the media (and people like Carlos) are... They only want the money shot and they don't care whether it shows the truth.

Don't know about this case, but you all need to watch this video to see how one sided the media (and people like Carlos) are... They only want the money shot and they don't care whether it shows the truth.

UC Davis incident (in full):

http://www.youtube.com/embed/hhPdH3wE0_Y

http://www.copblock.org/10871/john-bush-arrested-for-filming-police/

A good old fashioned angry cop confusing "interfering"
with "documenting."

Unbelievable, to me - that there are still people sticking up for the police state...and using "there" instead of "their" - hahaha. WTF? I guess some want this to be the fourth reich. Oh well - I'm outta here. I'll take my talent and energy and intelligence and love to another country. Good luck to all the brave souls who stay here and try to educate the idiot masses.

BTW - I did call...the police and DA. I told them it seems to me as a concerned citizen that it's the cops and school officials that are the criminals in these situations...plain as day. And I tried watching the so-called extended "real" version of the cops pepper-spraying the peaceful protesters. I don't care what ORDERS the cops give. Martial law has not been declared - and we are NOT citizen soldiers...I don't have to follow orders. People are s'posed to be able to do what they want...and act true to their beliefs. If we have to follow orders, that makes it a POLICE STATE. No better than Nazi Germany.