Disney officials shun videography in wake of monorail accident
Anybody who has been to Disney World knows that it’s one of the most photo-friendly places in the country.
After all, isn’t it supposed to be the most magical place in the world or something?
But that wasn’t the way it was early Sunday in the wake of the monorail crash which killed its driver and left other riders injured.
In fact, while Disney patrons were trying to determine if the driver was alive, Disney employees were telling a videographer, “no cameras.”
No cameras?
I would think you would need all the evidence you can get in the incident that has left many questions unanswered.
And I know what some people are thinking. That you shouldn’t film other people’s tragedies because it shows “disrespect” to the families involved.
Well if that was my family member who had been killed, I would want all the information I can get, including video footage. It’s not about sensitivity. It’s about the truth.
Photography is Not a Crime reader Spokker, who was kind enough to send me this video (which is already making the mainstream media rounds), was having a similar debate on a Disney forum. This is what he said.
Somethings are just wrong and that is one of them.”
I wasn’t talking about seeing the gore. I was talking about observing the aftermath, like the procedures followed and who did what. We would have learned a lot more about the Columbia accident (another fatal Disney accident) if someone had been able to get footage of the aftermath. We’d know if Disney really rushed in and cleaned the accident site to cover things up.
While the situation is not exactly the same, I can think of some incidents where footage has helped make clearer an otherwise grisly scene.
A few months ago an unarmed man was shot in the back at a BART station in the East Bay Area. Luckily for the family of the victim multiple passengers were filming with their cell phone cameras. While police confiscated some cameras (they shouldn’t have been allowed to do that), footage from multiple angles reached YouTube and showed the officer murdering the man in cold blood. Without a tape, would the public outcry be as great?
My point is that the camera catches impropriety on the part of officials, be them private or public, whom we trust to do the right thing. The camera is a powerful tool just for that purpose.
Can you fix the focus on a blurry photo after the fact?
The birth of Mirrorless Cameras
The Joy Of Winning A Photo Contest
Choosing your first dSLR camera
New York City can be beautiful!
Choosing the Right Light Stand
Photojojo iPhone Telephoto Lens review — AudioCast
My week with Q
How To Become A Successful Photographer
"When the Wind Stopped" — poem with 4 photos
Tips for Textures
Butterflies in Motion
Cast aways - saving those photographic memories
One Man Show: My 25 Years With Digital Photography
Studio, Flash, & Available Light — Three Books Reviewed
Portrait styling: dangerous pairings
Adobe Photoshop CS6 Product Managers Interview Audiocast
A gift of flowers: unfold your senses
On Set of "Love & Robots" the Film
Ilford Galerie Gold Fibre Silk Inkjet Paper — Audiocast











Planning “National Geographic” style photo travel
Wilderness Travel 1 Rainforests – Essential Gear
Backlighting Basics
A Brief History Of Light & Photography: Part 3 of 3
A Brief History Of Light & Photography: Part 2 Of 3
What Moves You?
FIGURES IN MOTION: Decades of Evolving Personal Imagery in Photography, Part 7
Lomography Store, Austin, Texas — GALLERY
GALLERY — Up to $1,000 Reward for Cattle Rustlers
eyePhone: The eBook for iPhone Photographers
Taking your Portraiture Higher
Interview with Harold Davis — Closeup Maestro of Flowers & Water Drops
Interview with Steve Caplin — Photoshop Digital Artist, Commercial Illustrator, & Author
Easy technique to select, edit and sequence keywords for web
How much should you charge for a photograph?
























Comments
Obviously, CYA is easier when there is no independent video.
Well, Disney’s obsessive control over its image in the park is known far and wide. There is a dystopian aspect to it, and anything that diminishes the fantasy is going to be rejected by staff. Accidents like this arnt just going to be the basic CYA for something like the Disney control freaks. Heads will roll just because they wernt able to control the NEWS of the crash. At this point, everyone is going ‘oh fuck oh fuck,’ and I would argue that the train operator probably thought it was Disney policy to cover-up and reduce the impact of the negative Disney imagery.
Kids crying after a fatal monoroil accident is not an image Disney wants out there.
I just think it’s funny that we put up with being on camera, whether we know it or not, every single day. You go into a private business, there’s cameras everywhere. You go out on the street, there’s cameras everywhere. But when you turn the camera around on the government or a private company, they squash that shit immediately.
Keep snapping photos and rolling film, always.
Off topic, but I thought this might interest you Carlos:
N.J. judge rules blogger not protected by newspaper shield laws, can be sued for slander
http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2009/07/nj_judge_rules_blogger_not_pro....
i agree with Spokker. How many cameras does disney have operating at their parks?
Heaven forbid the mindless consumers want to make their own video.
Oh my god. I would have just kept filming, seeing as many people were already trying to help and many not knowing what to do or stunned by the accident.
@Spokker
I know, right? Even at tourist attractions like disney world, you’re likely to be part of several family photos or videos without even knowing.
I would assume its still under investigation, but does anyone have details on the cause of the crash?
Post new comment