Herald says it's the articles, not photos that will force them to sue local blogger
At first, The Miami Herald was making a hissy fit about a couple of photos that Miami blogger Random Pixels ran on his site.
But now that they got the lawyers involved, they are saying it is not necessarily the photos but the articles he reprints on his site, most which are decades old and are obtained through the free online archives of the Miami-Dade Public Library.
Last week, attorney Ian Ballon of Greenberg Taurig sent Random Pixels a letter referring to L.A. Times vs Free Republic, a 1998 case that determined that posting entire excerpts of articles is not covered under the Fair Use Doctrine but constitutes a copyright violation.
But Random Pixels argues that because the articles he posts are so outdated, they fall into the public domain (In the above case law, the articles in question were clearly current). And he is refusing to remove the articles as well as refusing to remove the photos, which are no longer part of the central argument anyway.
So now it will be interesting to see what the Herald does now that their lawyer’s intimidation tactics have failed. And it’s curious to see how much money the Herald will spend on this considering they have done nothing but cut journalistic jobs this year.
Olympus' Micro Four Thirds 75mm prime
Can you fix the focus on a blurry photo after the fact?
The birth of Mirrorless Cameras
The Joy Of Winning A Photo Contest
Choosing your first dSLR camera
New York City can be beautiful!
Choosing the Right Light Stand
Photojojo iPhone Telephoto Lens review — AudioCast
My week with Q
How To Become A Successful Photographer
"When the Wind Stopped" — poem with 4 photos
Creating The New Family Portrait
Tips for Textures
Cast aways - saving those photographic memories
One Man Show: My 25 Years With Digital Photography
Studio, Flash, & Available Light — Three Books Reviewed
Portrait styling: dangerous pairings
Adobe Photoshop CS6 Product Managers Interview Audiocast
A gift of flowers: unfold your senses
On Set of "Love & Robots" the Film
No-Brainer Setup For A Digital Photo Frame Exhibit - Part 3











Planning “National Geographic” style photo travel
Wilderness Travel 1 Rainforests – Essential Gear
Backlighting Basics
What Moves You?
FIGURES IN MOTION: Decades of Evolving Personal Imagery in Photography, Part 7
Lomography Store, Austin, Texas — GALLERY
GALLERY — Up to $1,000 Reward for Cattle Rustlers
25% off on photography eBooks
eyePhone: The eBook for iPhone Photographers
Interview with Harold Davis — Closeup Maestro of Flowers & Water Drops
Interview with Steve Caplin — Photoshop Digital Artist, Commercial Illustrator, & Author
A Brief History Of Light & Photography: Part 3 of 3
A Brief History Of Light & Photography: Part 2 Of 3
Easy technique to select, edit and sequence keywords for web
How much should you charge for a photograph?

























Comments
I don’t know why they are even bothering with this crap. Maybe the Miami Herald should be more concerned with REAL problems such as Carlos Alvarez and the crap he is trying to pull? I hate the press sometimes, I really do!
Criminy. Maybe the Herald should work on not dying within a matter of weeks instead of making themselves look like jerks.
If everyone on the internet respected copyright, there’d be no problems. Since that will never happen, it comes down to lawyers.
The excerpting issue is near the heart of the AP’s current legal posturing, with their so-called DRM for news content (it’s not.)
There is still some distance to go before a happy solution is found for publishers, bloggers and news authors. Maybe sharing ad revenue or something, when a blog post is chiefly composed of excerpted material. Not that that amounts to much with most blogs, but it’s worth thinking about.
Post new comment