Honolulu Cops Flies Into Rage; Injures News Videographer

In a fit of rage, a Honolulu police officer grabbed a camera out of a woman's hand and slammed it on top of the car she was in.

The woman, a producer for a Hawaiian public access television show, ended up with a gashed finger.

The officer, who then appeared shaken by his actions, ended up writing his name and badge number on a card, courteously explaining how she could file a complaint.

And this guy is trusted with a gun?

The incident occurred last week while President Barack Obama was visiting Hawaii. The news crew were filming a segment for a program called We Are Change, Hawaii.

They pulled up to where the president was staying, were denied access and were quickly on their way before they realized they were being followed by police and secret service agents.

Then they pulled into a gas station.

According to KITV.

The women said police vehicles and up to five officers surrounded the car, demanded IDs and registration without explanation.

Then without warning an officer reached into the car and grabbed Jones’ camera.“He grabbed it out of my hand and then he slammed it on top of the car,” Jones said.

She said the camera was damaged – the automatic lens cover no longer worked.Jones’ fingers were gashed by the sharp edge on the camera mount.

She said the officer appeared shaken by what he'd done and courteously showed her how to complain, writing his name and badge number on a card with contact information for the Honolulu Police Commission.

Kane said other officers on the scene would not let them make a criminal complaint against the officer who grabbed the camera.

So essentially we have our everyday run-of-the-mill attack on photographers.

Call me jaded because my main question is not how can these officers get away with this. They do every time.

My question: is R. J. Hampton really a woman?

Hampton, who is part of the news crew, is described as a woman in the KITV article, but as a "pink-shirted man" in this Blaze article.

KITV also referred to Hampton as B.J. Hampton in the video, so not only is there confusion about his or her gender, we are not even sure if we have the right name.

Hampton can be seen and heard in the video, so let me know what you think.

A Photography is Not a Crime reader who prefers not to be named wrote the following letter to the police chief.

Dear Chief Kealoha,

It is with much consternation, indignation, and indeed anger, that I bring the following video to your attention.

http://www.kitv.com/r/26327764/detail.html

In this video, that clearly shows an officer of the Honolulu police department committing, what is an assault and battery with injury to a member of the press. The video clearly shows there is no reasonable cause that she has committed, or is about to commit any crime. Yet, she is subject to unreasonable police power in the form of assault, battery and physical injury. How does your department justify such egregious actions on an innocent citizen, and a member of the press?

I have always held the view that LEO's should be held to the same, if not higher, standard of the law, than other citizens, as they have a extraordinary powers and enhanced awareness  of the law.

I would urge you to deal with this rogue officer's criminal behavior in a swift and decisive manner, in the form of termination, and criminal charges of assault and battery. Nothing less, would send a message that his behavior is tolerated and condoned by the department. In addition, I hope the reporter pursues damages under

Given this officer's behavior, I am at odds how this fits with the department stated objectives of:

INTEGRITY

We have integrity. We adhere to the highest moral and ethical standards. We are honest and sincere in dealing with each other and the community. We have the courage to uphold these principles and are proud that they guide us in all we do.

RESPECT

We show respect. We recognize the value of our unique cultural diversity and treat all people with kindness, tolerance, and dignity. We cherish and protect the rights, liberties, and freedoms of all as granted by the constitutions and laws of the United States and the State of Hawaii.

FAIRNESS

We act with fairness. Objective, impartial decisions and policies are the foundation of our interactions. We are consistent in our treatment of all persons. Our actions are tempered with reason and equity.

This officer's behavior does not display any of your stated objectives. His behavior shows the worst in which we expect from our law enforcement officers. No reasonable cause that a crime has been committed, or is about to be committed, yet physical abuse and injury has been.

Again, swift and decisive action is important to send a clear message to all other officers your the system. I

 look forward to your response in this matter,

Comments

I would trust this LEO with a firearm. He is human and made a mistake. He realised his mistake and told the woman she should file a complaint. In my opinion this makes him an honest man. If we were to disarm people because of a momentary lapse of reason, none of us would have arms.

While this LEO might have realized his mistake, it does not relieve him from answering for his crimes of assault, battery, and destruction of property. In my book he deserves to be prosecuted as any member of the public would, for assault/battery, and destruction of property. Also, given that the LEO acted under the color of authority, should he not be held accountable under US Title 18 USC 242?

What if I cave someone's skull in with a baseball bat, and then say "I am sorry", here is my address/phone number/email address so you you can find me later. Does that make me any less culpable than someone who ran away? A serious crime has been committed, and the fact that I am sorry is irrelevant until I am convicted and sentenced by the judge.

I did not address the possible criminal charges that the officer should face. I just addressed his honesty in realising he had done wrong.

He should not have grabbed the camera but to say it is assault and battery or malicious destruction of property is a bit of a stretch, even for this website.

I like the woman who says they could be out catching real criminals as if real criminals wear signs that say I am a real criminal.

IF it had been anyone drawing blood on a officer that person would probably be HALF dead and facing felony assault charges resisting arrest.

IT was definatly assault and battery and malicious destruction of property,
IT was also prior restraint and a violation of there first amendment rights .
THEY used the color of law to deny these women there constitutional rights and that is a federal crime.

So, if I grab a clipboard out of the hand of a police officer writing me a parking ticket and lacerate his/her hand in the process, am I allowed a pass? Will I be only be charged later with some minor misdemeanor later? I would think not. My guess is that I would be charged with a felony assault on a police officer. So, why is there some double standard for LEO's? Shouldn't we all be held to the same standard? Perhaps I am naive, but it is what I believe.

Tom

No you wouldn't get a free pass because like it or not when he has you stopped you are not in control of the scene he is. I don't know how you could justify grabbing the clipboard. So you would probably be charged with something it would likely only be a misdemeanor.

LJM

So, since the officer can't justify grabbing the camera, you think he'll be charged with a misdemeanor?

You don't lose your rights just because an officer stops you. You are presumed innocent. The officer is not judge, jury and executioner. You have the right to defend yourself against battery even if you are stopped by an officer. However, had this women attempted to defend herself against this battery she would have found herself being tased at the very least and shot dead at the very most.

Cops are not Gods. They work for the people. There job is to uphold all laws. They don't have a free pass to violate those laws.

How many laws does your state have? I bet if call the local police station you won't find out because they don't know. I bet the same goes for any state legislator. How can police officers uphold ALL laws if their is no way to know all laws?

Bart stopping people without probable cause is illegal.

Stopping the press from legally recording is illegal

prior restraint is illegal

slamming another persons property and destroying it with the intent of covering up those crimes is also illegal.

Harming someone and drawing blood while committing a illegal act is also illegal.

SO arguing over who is in control when the illegal unconstitutional detainment is taking place is irrelevant.

These women are obviously suffering from Stockholm syndrome.

These women are suffering from the disease of Liberalism. One symptom of this disease is the uncontrollable urge to not hold people personally accountable for their actions.

I recently wrote a quick message to Chief Kealoha regarding this incident and surprisingly he called me today. I find that promising. Whether or not something gets done will be seen, but he did assure me that there is an internal investigation going on and that he intends to get to the bottom of this. The fact that he called me all the way here in NY, when I know that he had no obligation to, was a good sign to me.

Post new comment

Pixiq on Facebook

Join the 10136 Pixiq fans on Facebook

Share

  • Share

Subscribe

Get weekly updates from Pixiq. Short, sweet, and always interesting.