Another White-Shirted NYPD Cop Caught On Video Beating Citizens
With more than 10,000 people joining the Occupy Wall Street protests on its 19th day - the largest crowds yet - police used pepper spray and batons on activists while making hordes of arrests.
The above video shows a white-shirted supervisor cop beating back protesters with a baton.
The video below comes from Luke Rudkowski, a New York independent journalist who said he was pepper sprayed and knocked down.
Even Fox News reporters were getting attacked by cops.
Patrick Bruner, spokesman for the Occupy Wall Street movement just reported that at least 20 people were arrested, but that number is expected to climb.
The escalation in protesters is a result of several unions joining the movement, which has prompted some activists to accuse them of trying to hijack the movement.
But the unions are just part of the multitude of groups participating in the movement, which range from anarchists, liberals, libertarians and even a few tea party members.
One of the goals for the movement is to recruit non-supervisorial blue-uniformed police officers, who are said to be much more supportive of the protesters than their white-shirted supervisors.
But we all know working class police officers are sworn to protect the interests of the corporate masters these activists are rallying about.
I find the whole thing very fascinating and I'm tempted to fly up to New York to do my own reporting.
Right now, the biggest obstacle against the protesters who are camped out in a park is probably the approaching winter.
Where do you all stand on this? How long do you think this will last?
Below is a clip that shows a blue-shirted cop bragging that "my little nightstick is going to get a workout tonight."
And below that is video footage from the Occupation Seattle protest showing confrontations between police and activists who are camping out in a public park.
Olympus' Micro Four Thirds 75mm prime
Can you fix the focus on a blurry photo after the fact?
The birth of Mirrorless Cameras
The Joy Of Winning A Photo Contest
Choosing your first dSLR camera
New York City can be beautiful!
Choosing the Right Light Stand
Photojojo iPhone Telephoto Lens review — AudioCast
My week with Q
How To Become A Successful Photographer
"When the Wind Stopped" — poem with 4 photos
Creating The New Family Portrait
Tips for Textures
Cast aways - saving those photographic memories
One Man Show: My 25 Years With Digital Photography
Studio, Flash, & Available Light — Three Books Reviewed
Portrait styling: dangerous pairings
Adobe Photoshop CS6 Product Managers Interview Audiocast
A gift of flowers: unfold your senses
On Set of "Love & Robots" the Film
No-Brainer Setup For A Digital Photo Frame Exhibit - Part 3











Planning “National Geographic” style photo travel
Wilderness Travel 1 Rainforests – Essential Gear
Backlighting Basics
What Moves You?
FIGURES IN MOTION: Decades of Evolving Personal Imagery in Photography, Part 7
Lomography Store, Austin, Texas — GALLERY
GALLERY — Up to $1,000 Reward for Cattle Rustlers
25% off on photography eBooks
eyePhone: The eBook for iPhone Photographers
Interview with Harold Davis — Closeup Maestro of Flowers & Water Drops
Interview with Steve Caplin — Photoshop Digital Artist, Commercial Illustrator, & Author
A Brief History Of Light & Photography: Part 3 of 3
A Brief History Of Light & Photography: Part 2 Of 3
Easy technique to select, edit and sequence keywords for web
How much should you charge for a photograph?



































Comments
Where do I stand on it?
I think the protests are all completely stupid. Trying to tell private businesses what to do with their money is ridiculous. That being said, I cannot stand the way the police are behaving. They are as much thugs (and more, often) as these protestors.
If you want a say on Wall Street, buy stock and vote. Show up, as a shareholder, at the shareholders meeting and be heard.
If you aren't a shareholder, you are in no position to gripe at the pay structure and money spent by a private business.
NOW, IF THE BUSINESS WAS BAILED OUT by the US Govt, I am ALL FOR the govt having control over spending of all forms until these businesses pay back every penny (in other words, basically never).
Nobody has ever been able to tell me how raising taxes on the rich will lower unemployment, raise home values, stabilize business. There simply is no link. Taking more money out of the hands of the employers, out of the accounts of business, will not create jobs or cause spending.
This country collapsed on two major things:
1) The crash of too many banks and 2) The failure of the US auto industry.
The banks mostly failed as they were forced by legislation (Dodd/Frank) to loan money to people who couldn't afford the notes. When the loans ceased being paid and the real estate market collapsed (no homes selling, tons of negative equity), the banks collapsed.
The big three failed (two heavily failed) due to the employees taking far more money out of the businesses than was coming in as profits. This situation was caused by expensive union contracts that were forced through under threat of strike many times over many decades.
Ask yourself this: Which party controlled the banking laws from 2001-forward? Which pushed these banking regs through? Well, the same party that hand holds the same unions that destroyed the auto industry: The Democratic Party.
Now, the same people who voted for these politicians and policies, for these unions, are protesting at the failure of the businesses they or their politicians kneecapped.
At least the unions and George Sorors are out there funding the protestors to lean on democracy and capitalism . Niiiiiiice.
Notliberal
Ha ha ha, wow, that's so textbook I'm surprised it doesn't have footnotes.
It is simple math. Government revenue is down. Why? Because fewer people are working, fewer people are making a decent wage. A live-able wage. One that can put a roof over their head (even as rent), food in their bellies and provide for a family. So the government sets up tax rules so these people get refunds out of what they pay through their paychecks. Add on top of that the people who are not employed at all and therefore there are no taxes from those people either, all the while the government is spending (and spending in a recession to keep money -flowing- in our capitalist society, since spending is down from the other two parts of the triat: the consumers and private business).
And there is math that proves that there is an income -growth- disparity. Not that there is an income disparity, we live in a capitalist society and we expect income disparity. But the top 1%'s income has grown disproportionate to the other jobs in America.
Not only do they enjoy a tax rate lower than it was in the 1950s, but is proportionately lower than the average Americans was at the time as well.
The protests are targeting the largest public target of America's problems. Wall Street. You have unlimited private and non-disclosed funding of candidates from private business (where a single entity is representing a group of shareholders) and unions (who are acting on the behalf of a larger subset of the population), though private business has been quicker to pick up on this type of funding, but unions will eventually take the route as well.
Private money from both sides of the aisle funding political thought, the Republican party attempting to fail a Presidency through inaction rather than the failing of ideas (block it, defund it, just do not let run free for a while... if it works, we are screwed in 2012). In the last four years, there has never been a brighter spotlight shown on where the money is coming from that funds our political candidates, nor how lockstep its been corporate interests. Never has the spotlight shown brighter on the revolving door linking businesses and government.
And then to blame the American people, as if the sudden influx of unemployed during the recession was because people suddenly got stupid or lazy instead of just fired, when the problem ultimately becomes that business has become maximizing return at any cost, even in economic downturns, instead of just being proud of the fact that you are in the black.
So yes, people are upset. What Wall Street represents is the most influence on our country's government with the least amount of penalty.
And if you doubt that, JP Morgan Chase just donated an unprecedented 4.6 million the NYPD days before the police began attempting wrangle up protestors. There is not even an attempt to hide the money here.
When we the people bail out private businesses it is our ******* money!!!!! Banks got bailed out we got sold out.
Now any one that wants to try to make this a partisan issue please remember the de-regulation occurred under a REPUBLICAN congress and a DEMOCRAT president.
Glass-Steagall was repealed in 1999 and the Commodities Futures Modernization Act was passed in 2000. Ever hear of a credit default swap?
The above legislation was the permit for the Wall Street institutionalized scam bag robber baron plutocrats to go ahead and fleece the American people.(Actually the robber barons started in 1998 when Citicorp merged with Travelers violating Glass-Stegall and republicans and democrats knelt down for their plutocrat masters and sold out the American people.) Rich is not the same thing as institutionalized scam-bag robber baron plutocrat. They don't make money they take it.
Even if all you have in life is a piggy bank with one dollar the associated currency devaluation of the bailout decreased the buying power of that dollar.
The reality of our current economic system is not left or right.
Its a small private club and you ain't in it.
I don't care how much money you have. Unless you are in the funny money creation federal reserve/central bank or the Wall Street finincial instrument manipulation scam bag club you are out.
In reply to Notliberal, the white house was occupied by George W. Bush from 2000-2008, not the democrats. Not that it matters, as they're both equally responsible for the state of our economy.
Dear Sir,
I believe that are a few fallacies in your arguments:
1. Everybody that lives in America should pay taxes. We all use roads, schools, mail, etc. So when corporations, such as GE, have negative net income and receive a tax refund from the government while paying their CEO several million... I think I have a right to be pissed off.
2. Open a macroeconomics book and you will see a simple formula: GDP = Consumption + Investment + Government Spending + Net Imports. Therefore increasing government spending does in fact increase and this is even historically verified: FDR's stimulus and WWII enabled economic recovery in the 1940s.
3. Trickle down theory is a myth. When is one time in history decreasing taxes led to increased employment? Over the past years we've greatly cut taxes, decreased regulation, and have lost significantly more jobs than have been created.
It's okay if you disagree with my points. However, when our country's income inequality is equal to Yemen's, when home equity values have decreased 35% during the same period that Wall Street's profits have soared 700%, when student's are crippled by debt and can't get jobs, when the number of Americans on food stamps has reached a record 43.345 million I think it's time we set our differences of opinion aside and remembered that nobody is more powerful than the people united.
Carlos go to the occupy (local city here), Florida. Save the air fair.
It is not a left right fight but an up down fight.
2% of the population owns 50% of the country's wealth.
While 50% of the country owns 2% of the wealth.
50 years ago a person who barely graduated high school could work making cars and buy a house.
Those jobs are gone, but the people with the limited skill sets remain.
Like the occupy wall st, I don't have a solution to the lack of decent jobs, but the GOP idea of doing nothing is not a solution.
Has anyone else noticed that the NYPD is no longer wearing their name tags? See 2nd video.
Your right. Sorry. I guess I need to either clean or get new glasses. :-)
With all this talk about the bad things going on with Police at OccupyWallStreet and other Occupy protests, I want to call SPECIAL ATTENTION to the DALLAS POLICE DEPARTMENT at OccupyDallas who are the EXACT OPPOSITE of what has been shown here and what has been happening in other protests.
The DPD has been HELPFUL, RESPECTFUL and PROFESSIONAL. They have been working to help block off traffic for us to safely cross the street, and are even working to help work with the protesters on setting up camp. The DPD has been AMAZING and has gone ABOVE AND BEYOND their jobs, doing MORE than they need to!
Carlos, if you want video, comments, etc from OccupyDallas on this (and/or) other things, you can either go to occupydallas.org, or you can send a message through me, and I will make sure it gets to the proper people.
Keep in mind in NY, it is a question of who is working for who. For example, it has been widely reported in many NY newspapers that the CIA is working with the NYPD. Also, JP Morgan Chase recently donated $4.6 million dollars to the NYPD.
That is a fair point, and I agree. However, my main point was really just about how there are some places in this country where the cops still do work for the people, and not the corporations.
what happened. did they run out of black guys on motorcycles to run over , beat up and lie about?
oh yeah is the chiefs son out of the joint yet? how about the chiefs buddy also a chief who turned out to be a killer? keep braggin i got at least 50 more
Post new comment