Man Seeking Lawyer To Sue Houston Police Who Arrested Him For Recording Them

It’s been almost a year since Houston police arrested Jeffrey Decker after he video recorded them abusing a young man in a shopping mall.

They walked up to him and demanded his identification. When he refused to give it to them, they arrested him on a charge of failure to identify.

But Texas law clearly states that police must have “lawfully arrested” a person before they can charge him with failing to identify himself, meaning they had no grounds to arrest him if all he was doing was video recording them.

Decker spent 30 hours in jail before a judge dismissed the charge, then spent another six hours in the slammer before they actually released him.

You would think this case would be ripe for a lawsuit, but Decker has been unable to find a lawyer to take his case.

One attorney assured him he could win $10,000, but that attorney also wanted $15,000 up front.

Decker, a freelance journalist covering the aerospace industry, just doesn’t have that much money lying around.

So he’s hoping an attorney will see this article and take the case on spec. The statute of limitations expires on February 20, 2012.

Here is how he described the incident in an email to Photography is Not a Crime:

Two officers of the Houston Police Department's special forces unit attacked a 19-year-old man who was quietly sitting on a bench at a downtown mall. The officers did not like the way he was looking at them. He was cited with disorderly conduct but the charge was dismissed after he spent 30 hours in jail.

I happened to be nearby to purchase some batteries when the officers put the young man in a headlock, punched him repeatedly and body-slammed him. My video camera recorded from this moment onward as he was cuffed and as officers expressed hostility at being taped.

Soon afterward they demanded to see my driver's license and arrested me when I refused. I also spent 30 hours in jail. Even after the judge dismissed my charge of "failure to provide identification" we both spent 6 hours in the overcrowded city jail before being released.  

This all occured on Feb. 20 and 21, 2010. I've been searching without success for a Houston attorney to pursue a lawsuit against the Houston Police Department. The statute of limitations goes into effect this February. Texas attorneys are encouraged to contact me to remind these violent police officers they are public servants. 

As a freelance journalist I mostly cover aerospace and fuels, but one of my long-term projects is to write a book titled "Orderly Conduct: Defending liberty before it is destroyed." 

Decker can be contacted at mrjeffdecker@gmail.com.

Comments

i will offer my services pro bono

That's great!

It may be that police interpret Texas Penal Code 38.02(b)(3) as requiring witnesses to identify themselves, even though that code does not actually say that; it only criminalizes witnesses lying to the police.

Hiibel v. Nevada (S.Ct. 542 U.S. 177, 2004) unequivocally says that a person may be punished for failure to identify themselves ONLY when the state has a stop-and-ID law AND the state's law requires reasonable and articulable suspicion of criminal involvement AND the officer has such suspicion.

Let me know if you want me to research the law in your pro bono effort.

You are mostly correct but one important fact is missing: The Hiibel court never ruled that a person produce a document. Actually, it wrote that a person in a stop-and-identify state only verbally provide his or her name.

The important issue in this scenario is WHETHER he was required to identify himself, NOT the form of the identification.

It is unimportant for you to be picky by misleadingly implying I meant a person had to produce an identification document, just as it is unimportant for me to be picky by correctly telling you that the Hiibel Court did NOT state a person need only verbally provide his or her name. (542 US 177, 185)

Thanks for the offer. Could you please contact me at reporterdecker@gmail.com?

Hey Bulldog, not only are you a "gem" you are a true Public Hero. We will be nominating you for the PNG Public Heroes" award for going out of your way to assist a wronged citizen.

If 'All' attorneys/lawyers stuck their heads in the sand and ignored the victims of gross police & prosecutorial misconduct, we'd eventually see police removing the eyeballs of those within eye-shot of their 'tune-ups'. Thank you for stepping up and taking the money out of the equation in the name of doing the right thing. Your actions (1 week ago) will go a long way in rebuilding the public's trust in attorneys/lawyers.

With that said, they say the leading cause of wrongful convictions is false eyewitness identifications. I say bullshit, the leading cause is retaining or being appointed a piss poor attorney/lawyer. And since the courts allow Divorce & Will specialist to dabble in Criminal Defense, we'll continue to 95 to 98 percent plea out their clients during lunch recess. Thanks.

*Let us know if you ever need help and we'll be there for you.

Hey Carlos, where are our manners. Thank you for taking time to Post Mr. Decker's plea for assistance. You my friend, also truly deserve the public's recognition for sticking your neck out in the name of liberty and trust for all.

Without folks like you, we'd be walking/driving/biking/boating/etc around the nation thinking nothing about filming public servants in public performing their daily duties. We'd assume that Cops and Jail reality shows film them, so what's the harm with a taxpaying citizen/photographer doing it? We'd remember that they have dash-cams filming themselves (when they aren't aiming away from the action). Now that we 'all' know better, we either don't dare in fear of getting 'Carlosed' or do it with pride.

Upon learning about your 1st encounter, we've envisioned & embarked on creating a National Film a Public Servant Day (a work in progress) that will encourage recording thousands if not millions in public while on duty. Capturing; the good, the bad and the ugly alike, to show that there are professionals doing their jobs and having no problem with the public observing and/or memorializing 'all' involved and their actions. We plan to pick the 12 most viewed uploads for a PNG Calender.

BTW. COP Magazine has an archived (2010) article from the editor, showing that Good Cops have nothing to fear from being show-cased while on duty. Thanks again.

Bulldog, you are a gem for taking this on. congratulations!

Good for you Bulldog. Let us know how it's progressing.

If that guy on the right in black rode one of those bicycles it must have some kind of extra strong government tires to hold up that lard ass.

I'd say all four of these idiots need to spend a whole lot less time at Krispy Kreme and a lot more time at the gym.

Post new comment

Pixiq on Facebook

Join the 10138 Pixiq fans on Facebook

Share

  • Share

Subscribe

Get weekly updates from Pixiq. Short, sweet, and always interesting.