Man Sues D.C. Cops After Being Detained For Photography

Jerome Vorus, who was detained for 30 minutes for taking photos of Washington D.C. cops last summer, filed a lawsuit Thursday against the police department.
Police told Vorus it was illegal to photograph them in public without their permission – a blatant lie.
The incident took place almost one year ago on July 3, 2010 as Vorus came across police making a traffic stop in Georgetown, as he describes on his blog.
He stood on a public sidewalk and began snapping photos.
He was immediately approached by a male cop who demanded to know for “security reasons” why he taking their photo. Vorus said he was taking photos for his photo collection.
Eventually, an Officer Wishnick informed Vorus he was being detained.
According to the lawsuit:
10. At about that time, Officer Wishnick informed Mr. Vorus that it was illegal to take pictures of MPD officers without prior authorization of the public information officer for MPD. Officer Jane Doe 1 ordered Mr. Vorus to stop taking photographs and to put away his camera. Officer Wishnick also informed Mr. Vorus that it was illegal for him to audio-record her without her consent, and ordered him to turn off his recorder.
11. After Mr. Vorus handed over his identification, he asked for a supervisor. Two sergeants eventually arrived, John Doe 2 and John Doe 3. They also stated that Mr. Vorus could not take photographs of officers or audio-record officers without the consent of the officers. One of the sergeants told Mr. Vorus that he had to stop audio-recording because it was against the law. Those statements were false.
12. In the course of this incident, four different MPD officers told Mr. Vorus that it was illegal to photograph MPD officers without permission or to record them without their consent. That is not the law in the District of Columbia. One female officer informed Mr. Vorus that because he was on the streets of the District of Columbia and an officer asked for his identification, it was his responsibility to provide it. That is not the law in the District of Columbia. Speaking of Mr. Vorus’ detention, the same officer said, “It’s a stop . . . We could stop anybody.” That is not the law in the District of Columbia.
While he was being detained, another man stopped by and took some photos, but police ordered him away, telling him he was breaking the law.
Vorus, who is being represented by the ACLU, is suing on the basis that his First and Fourth Amendment rights were violated and that he was falsely arrested.
Olympus' Micro Four Thirds 75mm prime
Can you fix the focus on a blurry photo after the fact?
The birth of Mirrorless Cameras
The Joy Of Winning A Photo Contest
Choosing your first dSLR camera
New York City can be beautiful!
Choosing the Right Light Stand
Photojojo iPhone Telephoto Lens review — AudioCast
My week with Q
How To Become A Successful Photographer
"When the Wind Stopped" — poem with 4 photos
Creating The New Family Portrait
Tips for Textures
Cast aways - saving those photographic memories
One Man Show: My 25 Years With Digital Photography
Studio, Flash, & Available Light — Three Books Reviewed
Portrait styling: dangerous pairings
Adobe Photoshop CS6 Product Managers Interview Audiocast
A gift of flowers: unfold your senses
On Set of "Love & Robots" the Film
No-Brainer Setup For A Digital Photo Frame Exhibit - Part 3











Planning “National Geographic” style photo travel
Wilderness Travel 1 Rainforests – Essential Gear
Backlighting Basics
What Moves You?
FIGURES IN MOTION: Decades of Evolving Personal Imagery in Photography, Part 7
Lomography Store, Austin, Texas — GALLERY
GALLERY — Up to $1,000 Reward for Cattle Rustlers
25% off on photography eBooks
eyePhone: The eBook for iPhone Photographers
Interview with Harold Davis — Closeup Maestro of Flowers & Water Drops
Interview with Steve Caplin — Photoshop Digital Artist, Commercial Illustrator, & Author
A Brief History Of Light & Photography: Part 3 of 3
A Brief History Of Light & Photography: Part 2 Of 3
Easy technique to select, edit and sequence keywords for web
How much should you charge for a photograph?






























Comments
I'm glad to see that the ACLU isn't exclusively focusing on the more grievous transgressions. It's good that actions that are far more common are being looked at.
If you make a false statement to a law enforcement officer, you can be charged with making a false report whereas, the vast majority of what comes out of cops' mouths are blatant lies. I feel that pathological liars are drawn to, and welcomed with open arms by police forces. I would love to see honesty to be required of police, the same as citizens who deal with them.
Good. Even if lawyers get all of the compensation, I think this sets good precedents for other erroneous actions some police are taking.
One of these days the plantiffs need to start asking for a full page apology in the newspaper, admitting guilt, and along with an admission that is it perfectly legal to take photographs.
Can you imagine if the TSA were forced to write a full page on Blogger Bob
It would be even better along with the public apology if folks quit accepting the common non-disclosure agreement along with their hush money as part of any settlement.
Scott Bee..
Good ol' "Blogger Bob" has never told the truth in his life. He's even worse than "Johnny Law. Bart and LawMan" put together.
And as far as the T(hieves) S(tealing) A(nything).. the IRS is though of in much higher regards than they are.
It's a good thing I'm certified as a SP with TD and Amphib endorsements because I've been able to thumb my nose at the TSA and all their ridiculous "I wanna play tin cop" do nothing security charade!
Rail Car Fan
"certified as a SP with TD and Amphib endorsements"?
translation?
"While he was being detained, another man stopped by and took some photos, but police ordered him away, telling him he was breaking the law."
Damn, they're really into the Anonymity thing.
Let's also have a US President that can't be
photographed or recorded, you can't even mention his name...President "X"
Congressmen too...
Looks like Wishnick is going to have her record blemished. If it's the same officer she was just awarded Officer of the Month last week.
http://georgetown.patch.com/articles/officer-of-the-month-miriam-wishnick
She got that for busting some dope dealer. Another big "victory" in the war on drugs. Like there won't be 100 guys to replace him.
I love the hypocrisy that makes it perfectly legal for cops to lie to citizens but makes it illegal for the citizens to lie to the cops.
Post new comment