Las Vegas court officer detains journalists in courtroom
Earlier this month, we saw a video of a detention officer swiping a document from the case file of an attorney during a legal proceeding in an Arizona courtroom.
Now we have a Las Vegas court officer detaining a group of journalists inside a courtroom to allow Michael Jackson’s former doctor to leave without being followed.
If Constitutional rights can be so blatantly abused in our courtrooms, then what can we expect in our everyday life?
The latest incident occurred Monday when Dr. Conrad Murray and his attorneys left the courtroom after a hearing over back child support payments. He is also a focal point in the investigation into Jackson’s death but has not been charged.
When a pool of reporters, videographers and producers from, The Associated Press and other media organizations attempted to follow him outside to attempt an interview, they were blocked by Dennis Curran, a uniformed court marshal.
Curran, who held them for several minutes as Murray was able to get into his car and drive away, said he was following orders from his supervisor, Sgt. Steve Rushfield, who did not respond to messages seeking comment.
A lawyer for the AP said it is illegal to detain journalists from lawfully pursuing a story.
Whoever ordered this improper and possibly unlawful detention has some explaining to do,” AP associate general counsel Dave Tomlin said.
Clark County courts spokesman Michael Sommermeyer was among the group detained. He said he didn’t know why they were detained but gave the usual spiel about it having to do with “safety and decorum.”
“They’re police officers,” he said. “I guess they can deem what is necessary for public safety.”
In the previous incident, Judge Lisa Flores defended the detention officer swiping the document from the case file by stating the following:
“I do just want to say for the record that the deputies in my courtroom are responsible for courtroom security and they have a quite a lot of leeway to do what they think is necessary in a situation.”
See the problem we’re facing?
Can you fix the focus on a blurry photo after the fact?
The birth of Mirrorless Cameras
The Joy Of Winning A Photo Contest
Choosing your first dSLR camera
New York City can be beautiful!
Choosing the Right Light Stand
Photojojo iPhone Telephoto Lens review — AudioCast
My week with Q
How To Become A Successful Photographer
"When the Wind Stopped" — poem with 4 photos
Tips for Textures
Butterflies in Motion
Cast aways - saving those photographic memories
One Man Show: My 25 Years With Digital Photography
Studio, Flash, & Available Light — Three Books Reviewed
Portrait styling: dangerous pairings
Adobe Photoshop CS6 Product Managers Interview Audiocast
A gift of flowers: unfold your senses
On Set of "Love & Robots" the Film
No-Brainer Setup For A Digital Photo Frame Exhibit - Part 3











Planning “National Geographic” style photo travel
Wilderness Travel 1 Rainforests – Essential Gear
Backlighting Basics
A Brief History Of Light & Photography: Part 3 of 3
A Brief History Of Light & Photography: Part 2 Of 3
What Moves You?
FIGURES IN MOTION: Decades of Evolving Personal Imagery in Photography, Part 7
Lomography Store, Austin, Texas — GALLERY
GALLERY — Up to $1,000 Reward for Cattle Rustlers
25% off on photography eBooks
eyePhone: The eBook for iPhone Photographers
Interview with Harold Davis — Closeup Maestro of Flowers & Water Drops
Interview with Steve Caplin — Photoshop Digital Artist, Commercial Illustrator, & Author
Easy technique to select, edit and sequence keywords for web
How much should you charge for a photograph?

























Comments
AAARRGGHHHH. There I got that out. This is exactly why the United States is supposed to be a country of LAWS not a country of (wo)men.
If it were you or I, this means basically anyone reading this, do you think Judge Flores would have essentially ignored the illegal detention, restraint of trade and possibly prior restraint with respect to not be allowed to follow a bonafide story?
The issue here is more than simply these LEOs and this judge. I guarantee if you take this story to the general public, they’ll tell us all to quit whining. THAT is the problem.
The rights we used to have used to be pretty cool. We can read about them — maybe — in a museum one day.
Dennis Curran and Steve Rushfield just stopped being impartial enforcers of court rules, and instead became advocates for one of the parties.
This is ridiculous. I agree with Jay, the outrage is absent and the populace is apathetic. That is the true travesty. Until that changes, nothing will.
When police officers, civil servants and officers of the court gloss over gross and try to justify violations like this of Constitutional Proportion,….and the General Public is “OK” with it (just like the GitMo torture thing) it is indeed frightning to think of how far along we have come in our evolution towards becoming a Nation of “We the Sheeple” instead of “We the People.” Blind faith is for religions, not governments – .
THINK for yourselves Americans! Its the patriotic thing to do!
The public may be apathetic, but there’s another way to deal with this: million-dollar suits for denial of rights. That’s the only way to stop this right now.
Post new comment