Las Vegas Police Finally Determine Cop Was Out Of Line For Beating Videographer

It took Las Vegas police four months what it took the rest of us four minutes to determine.

That officer Derek Colling was way out of line when he beat up and arrested a man for videotaping him.

Still, there is still a chance that Colling might go undisciplined for the March incident that was caught on video.

Outside of termination, the worst fate he may suffer is a 40-hour unpaid suspension.

But that’s a drop in the bucket considering he’s been on paid administrative leave since April 1 – a four-month vacation on the taxpayer’s dime.

The Las Vegas Review-Journal reports that an internal investigation determined that Collings “violated several Metropolitan Police Department policies.”

Police did not give out many details but confirmed that the complaint of excessive force filed by Michael Crooks was sustained.

Crooks, 36, received a letter from the Internal Affairs Bureau notifying him of the findings earlier this week.

He said he was pleasantly surprised.

"It seems like they're saying he was guilty, which is what I've been saying," Crooks said. "I really hope he gets fired."

Multiple supervisors in Colling's chain of command will review the internal affairs report and decide his punishment, if any, Schofield said.

Crooks has a pending lawsuit against the department.

 

Comments

I don't now why they just don't try this cop for assult. He belongs in jail.

The Las Vegas Review-Journal reports that an internal investigation determined that Collings “violated several Metropolitan Police Department policies.”

This is excellent news, but when will this run-of-the-mill script that's used by police whenever something like happens, be rewritten and say what actually happened? Which is Derek Colling "violated several laws and constitutional rights and will be charged for his crimes."

It's just like the ubiquitous "misconduct" charge versus an actual criminal charge when police are caught doing something illegal.

Law enforcement's internal policies are in no way, shape or form more important than the law or the Constitution.

This special treatment give to police officers needs to stop and Colling needs to go in front of a judge and be told he's guilty and hit with some jail time.

Everybody thinks the "law" is about "justice."

It's not. All that talk of "fairness" and "equality" is merely a masquerade to maintain legitimacy of force by the City, or "Polis."

The Metro-Polis and Politics and Police are all about one thing - Protecting and Serving.

Protecting and Serving who?

Remember, 50% of the population holds 2% of the wealth in this country, and the gap is getting worse.

Derrick Jensen puts it even better than I, when he observes, "The property of those higher on the hierarchy is more valuable than the lives of those below. It is acceptable for those above to increase the amount of property they control — in everyday language, to make money — by destroying or taking the lives of those below. This is called production. If those below damage the property of those above, those above may kill or otherwise destroy the lives of those below. This is called justice." http://www.endgamethebook.org/Excerpts/1-Premises.htm

Now you know whom police Protect and Serve - the people who *own* this country.

The masquerade is nearly over; cameras have been a large instrument in revealing how things really work in the metro Polis-Politics-Police charade.

Well you are certainly free to be believe what you will, but this comes across as crazy..

It's time to quit sucking your thumb and observer the world, Elliot.

Bud

Call me crazy...

You won't find anyone more fed up with police than me. However, the old saw about X% owning Y% of the country, yadda yadda, is total crap. What everyone bandying that old canard about forgets is that people in America go up and down the "income quintiles" like yo-yo's. Last year's millionaire is this year's broke Jersey TV gal, and the top student of 2011 could land an $80K a year MBA gig in 2012. I've been up and down more than a few times myself. Of course, a small core group does stay put -- many in the web of families that got their foundations grandfathered in during the early 1900s -- but there is great mobility among classes here. When THAT stops, I will worry more about this. In the meantime, if you just up and seize all the private fortunes, the U.S. government would spend it in about 10 months. And none of those folks would be making money anymore -- why? People like you just want to seize it! So, take a little broader view -- I remind myself, "It starts with me," but that's harder than pointing fingers and blaming the rich, the powerful, the politicians... despite plenty of seemingly good justification. It is justified to be fed up, but not to keep stealing from people through taxation and (especially) inflation. Our main problem is, and always has been, government powermongers. They have the guns and the cops, not the "rich" folks. The SUPER rich folks don't make it into the headlines.

You won't find anyone more fed up with police than me. However, the old saw about X% owning Y% of the country, yadda yadda, is total crap. What everyone bandying that old canard about forgets is that people in America go up and down the "income quintiles" like yo-yo's. Last year's millionaire is this year's broke Jersey TV gal, and the top student of 2011 could land an $80K a year MBA gig in 2012. I've been up and down more than a few times myself. Of course, a small core group does stay put -- many in the web of families that got their foundations grandfathered in during the early 1900s -- but there is great mobility among classes here. When THAT stops, I will worry more about this. In the meantime, if you just up and seize all the private fortunes, the U.S. government would spend it in about 10 months. And none of those folks would be making money anymore -- why? People like you just want to seize it! So, take a little broader view -- I remind myself, "It starts with me," but that's harder than pointing fingers and blaming the rich, the powerful, the politicians... despite plenty of seemingly good justification. It is justified to be fed up, but not to keep stealing from people through taxation and (especially) inflation. Our main problem is, and always has been, government powermongers. They have the guns and the cops, not the "rich" folks. The SUPER rich folks don't make it into the headlines.

Given the police department themselves have decided he was out of line, surely a visit to the local DA and ask to press charges wouldn't be out of line.

power tripping homos
the guy clearly stated that he lived there right before getting tackled.
I'd like to see someone kick the "stop resisting" prick right in the side of his fat head.
even if the victim didn't live there.. since when do the cops get to decide someone is trespassing on someone else's property when the owner of that property hasn't reported a trespasser.

Two problems:

The D.A. won't press charges because most D.A. elections are decided by the police union endorsement.

Unpaid leave isn't necessarily unpaid—some police unions offer insurance against this mishap. Unpaid leave often does little besides appease the public that SOMETHING was done.

Aren't cops supposed to be the good guys instead of just the other bad guys?

How are we supposed to have any respect for these Nazis after watching something like this?

My respect has been replaced by fear!

The cop was an idiot and should have left the photographer alone. However since the Nazi comment was made...

Godwin's Law is in effect

Godwin's Law states that "As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches 100%."

And that's all that it states. It says nothing about the validity of the comparison, nor does it even imply that making the comparison somehow forfeits the argument.

If simply pointing out that an action is totalitarian in nature forbids further discussion, then you can never discuss totalitarian actions.

Sorry Johnny, try again.

It does though. I am sure the Jews and all the countries occupied by the Nazis would really appreciate how their experience gets compared to every single thing the police do that bothers you.

Ridiculous. People with no way to form their own thoughts fall back on the Gestapo line way to quickly.

Actually, the people from those countries, who moved to the US after the war probably appreciate it the most, thinking, "I've seen this before..."

I shouldn't have to remind such a studied scholar of history as yourself that the Nazis didn't wake up one morning and decide to slaughter 6 million innocent people. They took steps and clamped down on their citizenry one step at a time until such draconian measures eventually allowed the slaughter to happen. The United States is going down an eerily similar path if you actually bother to learn history, and the Nazi comparison is very accurate. As to why the Nazis are mentioned as opposed to Soviets or communists in general? Primarily it's because the Nazis did stuff that not even communist countries have done.

The Nazis get mentioned the most because they had the misfortune to have someone else's army come marching through their deathcamps taking pictures.

Hitler's also hurt by having picked a very literate people to do in. How many insanely great Jewish authors/producer/directors are there? How many Hutu? Armenians? Native Americans? Cambodians?

Western nations also get freaked out by the Nazis because they look too much like us. Most mass killing happens in primitive totalitarian or tribal structures. We can smugly say "Savages!". But Hitler was democratically elected in an educated, industrialized country. There's the persistent stomach-turning "Shit, that coulda been us."

"As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches one."

Goodwin's law applies to increasing rancor in a long argument. Here, the discussion is - quite short. Do you think that sometimes and immediate comparison to the Nazi regime is accurate, sans a long flame-war?

Besides, I think you just like to look at the symbol. Must be a favorite?

You're right that it's quite short. It is always an immediate thing here. It is insult made by the unimaginative and the lazy.

It's funny and sad how the Nazi's have become a label for anything anti-police. Heck, you even insinuate that I am one in your post above. Don't you see how weak this is?

I've been called a Nazi more times in my career than I can count. It's usually for ridiculous stuff. I wrote a guy a ticket the other night for walking in the middle of the street through traffic. Nazi. I wrote a seat belt ticket once to a taxi driver. Nazi. I arrested a guy for pissing on the sidewalk in front of a crowd. Nazi.

What is supposed to be a powerful accusation is just a joke thanks to folks like you. If you think calling a cop a Nazi is going shake cops to the core, you are fooling yourself. We roll our eyes at the jack booted thug comments because they are usually made by angry little people who can't think of any other way to express themselves.

I'm curios to know if you're one of those officers who cites people for not wearing their seat belt or talking on their cell phone while driving, but then gets back into your cruiser and does the exact same thing?

Yes.

Want some cheese with that?

Must be nice to be able to write laws that exempt you.

Bucking for congress?

I suspect you would say less then 10% of the things you've written on this site if you weren't hiding behind the anonymity of your pseudonym.

Why don't you use your real name so the people in your community can realize how much of a potential threat you are to them.

And don't throw this back at me because I use discarted, which has become synonymous with my actual name—Shawn Nee.

Google either one and they'll both pop up.

However, this is about you...hiding.

Luc

"We roll our eyes at the jack booted thug comments because they are usually made by angry little people who can't think of any other way to express themselves."

Angry little people, serfs, villeins, peons, slaves.

Johnny you think you're better than us, bigger than us, smarter than us, just because you have a badge, gun, and radio. Without those you are just a little douche bag bitch.

Being called a Nazi doesn't bother you because you know you are one. When you look like a Nazi, talk like a Nazi, and act like a Nazi, you probably are a Nazi.

If the Little People did onto you, as you do onto the Little People, you would cry fowl. Do as I say, not as I do.

Johnny, just because you are part of the Police State, doesn't mean you are not one of the little people.

What goes around comes around.

Luc,

Johnny Law is just a little kid. What you wrote are too deep for him to understand.

I've never been called a Nazi, which demonstrates people aren't using the term as loosely as you pretend.

Yet you have been called a Nazi, apparently many times.

The empirical evidence is no joke.

The psychopath is, as Scientific American puts it, "Largely devoid of guilt, empathy and love, they have casual and callous interpersonal and romantic relationships. Psychopaths routinely offer excuses for their reckless and often outrageous actions, placing blame on others instead. They rarely learn from their mistakes or benefit from negative feedback, and they have difficulty inhibiting their impulses." http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=what-psychopath-means

All that negative feedback, and you haven't learned a thing. So where does that put you?

Klink,

Thanks for making my point for me. So writing tickets = Nazi and questioning that label = psychopath.

Let me give you another definition:

drama queen : noun

Definition of DRAMA QUEEN

: a person given to often excessively emotional performances or reactions

It's people like you who have cheapened the whole Nazi comparison and is why concepts such as Godwin's Law even exists. The majority of people start to tune you out when you begin the shrill police state comments and put you in the same category as the morons who think 9/11 was an inside job.

Johnny, thanks for making my point, that is:

You demonstrate the characteristic of a psychopath who will "rarely learn from their mistakes or benefit from negative feedback," as Scientific American so succinctly states.

No, questioning the label people call you doesn't make you a psychopath, as you so feebly equivocate.

The question you need to ask yourself is: "Why are so many people, so many times, in so many places, so consistently, calling me a Nazi?"

You might learn something from such introspection, if you were normal.

If.

"The question you need to ask yourself is: "Why are so many people, so many times, in so many places, so consistently, calling me a Nazi?""

I think its probably because most people have a difficult time taking responsibility for their actions. I remember pulling over a guy for jumping the highway median to bypass traffic. Obvious violation and everyone knows you aren't supposed to do that. This guy was a clean cut guy maybe in his 40s. Decent car and all that. Fine outstanding citizen I suppose.

Well I wrote him a ticket and he looked at me and said "You know, this is why some people shoot police".

Really? That is a reason to murder a cop? I am sure he called me a Nazi as he drove off with his ticket. My point is that people love to lash out when most of the time it is their own damn fault. So no, I don't lose any sleep when people foam at the mouth and call me a Nazi. I know what it's worth.

"The majority of people start to tune you out when you begin the shrill police state comments and put you in the same category as the morons who think 9/11 was an inside job."

Where do you get all of your 9/11 knowledge? Obama? The government? MSNBC? CNN?
I hope you have at least looked in to other possibilities, especially with so many unanswered questions, before making stupid comments regarding those who have.

Oh geez here we go. There are multiple sources that debunk all those ridiculous theories. This is one of the better ones.

Educate yourself and stop listening to Alex Jones.

http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/engineering/architecture/911-...

Typical drivel from one who cannot "benefit from negative feedback."

You know what that makes you, Johnny, according to the Scientific American article.

Well there are over 1500 architects and engineers who disagree with the "Experts" over there at popular mechanics.
http://ae911truth.org/
But I'm sure you have already looked in to them and decided they are idiots too since it was so easy for you to dismiss anyone who questions the official story as "morons."
I guess the 9.11 Commissioners themselves are morons too since they even stated it was clear from the beginning that they would never receive all facts pertaining to the incident.
I could go on and on.. but it's wayyyy off topic (sorry Carlos) and I have a feeling it would be a waste of time.

"I've been called a Nazi more times in my career than I can count. It's usually for ridiculous stuff."

"Usually"? Please tell us more about the non-ridiculous stuff...

I agree that some applications of the term are not credible. Some certainly are.

From the Holocaust museum website:

"Police manpower was even extended by the incorporation of Nazi paramilitary organizations as auxiliary policemen. The Nazis centralized and fully funded the police to better combat criminal gangs and promote state security. The Nazi state increased staff and training, and modernized police equipment. The Nazis offered the police the broadest latitude in arrests, incarceration, and the treatment of prisoners. The police moved to take "preventive action," that is, to make arrests without the evidence required for a conviction in court and indeed without court supervision at all."

In some parts of the US this is already happening, such as Maricopa county, AZ

"It's funny and sad how the Nazi's have become a label for anything anti-police. Heck, you even insinuate that I am one in your post above. Don't you see how weak this is?"

Hey Troll, Cops are labeled "Nazi" because they act like one. Not because we are "anti-police".

The only thing weak is you sucking Nazis ****.

And that's why you will always be nothing but a peice of sh*t, JTroll. Because you think the Constitution is "anti-cop". You think the Bill of Rights is "anti-cop". You think tax payers demanding murderers with badges to not kill innocent victims "anti-cop".

Let me clue you in Troll. It's easy to be a piece of sh*t who does nothing but cause pain and misery.

The hard part is being an actual human being.

I would argue that posting an image of a swastika and pontificating that "Godwin's law is in effect" at any chance you get on this site is just as redundant, pointless, and annoying.

But usually, when more than one person is describing you in the same manner, there is very likely some truth to what they're saying.

Also, everyone tends to associate the word Nazi with WWII, Germany, Hitler, Jews, etc., but the word also means someone who acts brutally or behaves in away that is driven by extreme authoritarian views.

So JL, maybe that's why people are continually labeling you and other police officers Nazis.

Johnny's thin blue whine: "It does though!"

Is there a lollipop handy?

Out of line?
That's an appropriate description of a heckler
at a comedy gig, or a late hit on
a quarterback, not an unprovoked assault resembling
a bear attack.

I still can't even watch the entire thing. My stomach get all knotted up and I start shaking with anger.

I still can't even watch the entire thing. My stomach get all knotted up and I start shaking with anger.

I still can't even watch the entire thing. My stomach get all knotted up and I start shaking with anger.

I still can't even watch the entire thing. My stomach get all knotted up and I start shaking with anger.

This fucking paid vacation shit has to stop.

They should be paid until they are suspended or terminated. However I do agree that instead of being home with pay, they should be put in a non-law enforcement position while the investigation is ongoing.

Fuck that.

Suspension without pay. Preferably in a cell, or out on high bail. Higher standards mean exactly that.

IF exonerated, back pay and benefits. That way we're not paying for an obviously guilty thug with a badge while the "system" extracts it's cranium from it's anal sphincter.

Don't like it? There are plenty of service/agricultural jobs gone wanting in Georgia.

The problem with paying them back if exonerated is that the person still has bills, a mortgage, a family, etc. By the time they are exonerated (assuming they are) they would have lost their house. If the office is legitimately innocent, then having lost their house and ruining their credit wouldn't be fair. Getting them off the streets, out of a position of power and doing paperwork or other medial tasks is better in my opinion.

So how is this different from any other innocent who loses job, house, etc during the course of a trial?

A badge is not an immunity idol.

Police departments typically fire an officer once they are arrested and charged with crime. We are talking about administrative investigations of policy violations.

Two different things entirely.

jn

so when are your cops gonna start the criminal investigation

Post new comment

Pixiq on Facebook

Join the 10148 Pixiq fans on Facebook

Share

  • Share

Subscribe

Get weekly updates from Pixiq. Short, sweet, and always interesting.