Las Vegas Police Handcuff Woman Who Videotaped Them

Las Vegas police continue to harass, intimidate and threaten citizens who dare videotape them in public.

Last month we saw the video of a Las Vegas cop beating a man who continued to videotape him.

And now here’s a video of cops ordering a woman to turn off her camera.

The woman, who goes by TgrLilGzz on Youtube, said she was handcuffed for 56 minutes before she was released with no charges.

In the video, two cops have pulled over a woman for unknown reasons as TgrLilGzz begins recording the traffic stop.

One of the cops steps out of the passenger side of the police car and begins dealing with the woman he pulled over, ignoring TgrLilGzz, who is standing well away from the investigation.

Meanwhile, the cop in the driver’s side points out TgrLilGzz to the other cop, who then turns to her and asks, “Can I help you?

“I’m just being an observant citizen,” TgrLilGzz tells him.

“This doesn’t pertain to you at all. I need you to mind your own business,” the cop tells her.

“But sir, this is my business, this is my community,” she tells him.

This causes the cop who was in the driver’s seat to begin ordering her to stop recording.

“Do me a favor, put your camera down. Put your camera down now.

Both cops walk towards her in an aggressive manner reaching for what could be their guns, Tasers or handcuffs.

The woman stops recording.

This is how she described the incident on Youtube:

I was lawfully walking my dog. Leash in one hand, video in the other when two officer lunged toward me and cuffed me for 56 minutes. No charges, no ticket. Just a show of force and domination over me.

UPDATE: While it is not clear from the above video, another video TgrLilGzz posted from the incident after she was detained indicates she was openly carrying a firearm - which is legal in Nevada.

But in the above video, police seemed very concerned about her camera, not her gun.

Comments

Video isn't working..

But it sounds like these two need a week or two off without pay to get started. Then being added to the Brady List if they are allowed to continue on the force.

Carlos Miller - Photography is Not a Crime
Pixiq Expert

It should be working now.

I was wrong before.. They need to go to jail for assult.

She posted a video right after that. It looks like the cops advanced on her aggressively because she was open carrying a pistol.
http://youtu.be/Sp-iQU7hOEo

I can't really fault the officers for approaching her this way in the first place IF she was carrying a weapon even if it was legal.

I can't really fault the officers for approaching you in this way in the first place IF you are exercising your right to free speech even if it is legal.

I didn't hear anything about putting the gun down. Only about putting the camera down. I guess the camera is truly the new gun. It was the camera she was brandishing not the gun.

If this had been about the gun they would have asked her to put the gun down.

If you're allowed to carry open you're allowed to carry open. If they had a problem with the gun they would have said to put the gun down.

What if she had been carrying concealed?

They didn't tell her to put the gun down because it was in a holster but that doesn't mean she couldn't access it.

If it had been concealed, they wouldn't have known she had a gun.

I don't blame them for being concerned about an armed nutty woman hanging around them while they were conducting a traffic stop. I would probably done the same thing as the officers in this video until I figured out what this woman was up to.

Carlos Miller - Photography is Not a Crime
Pixiq Expert

JL,

Read the right-hand column of this article where they talk about how cops are trained to deal with citizens who are openly carrying a firearm.

Basically, if the person carrying the gun is not suspected of a crime, there is no reason to detain them.

This woman was walking her dog and filming the cops, both which are still legal in Nevada.

http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2010/apr/07/nevadans-are-free-don-their-...

Yeah open carry is legal in Vegas. However her hovering around the police officers while carrying is enough to get us nervous. Legal or not, we get ambushed enough that I am careful around people carrying. Especially people who are displaying an anti-police attitude by going around filming.

Yeah yeah got bananas about how filming isn't anti-police. Maybe so but I have had enough encounters with Copwatch and their wannabes to know that people who support the police don't typically do that type of behavior.

When I pull over a person who has a gun in the car, I make them keep their hands on the steering wheel. If they don't listen, I get them out and secure the gun until the stop is over. I have no problem with citizens being armed but I'm not going to get caught in a Lakewood style police shooting if I can help it.

If a 50-year old hot-looking "granny" with a leash in one hand and a cam in the other, wearing jeans, flip flops, a long-sleeved shirt, and a gigantic USMC patch on the back of her black motorcycle leather vest is spooky - just because she also open carries (like all cops do, btw) then might I suggest getting a "safer" job?

Don't try "roofing" cause that's a lot more dangerous than being an oath-taking peace officer.

There are between 800-900,000 peace officer in the states. 161 died on the job in 2010. About a third of those deaths were due to not wearing seat-belts (laws they enforce on us.)

The cop profession didn't even make the top 10 most dangerous jobs in the NY Times.

http://www.injusticeeverywhere.com/?p=3542

Nope. Nothing unusual about you. I can't imagine why the officers were concerned.

Why is it that only officers are concerned about my "unusual-ness?" Oh, and possibly criminals.

I was walking my dog in my previous dwelling (a condo across the street from the Rio). It was 10:30 p.m., dark, cold and a little rainy (December). I'm on the phone with my friend when this man pulls over next to me in this pimped-out car with tinted windows. He lowers his window and said something. I put my phone down a bit, turned toward him. I said, "Are you talking to me?"

He glanced at my gun and said, "No." Rolls the dark-ass window back up and moves on... (I'm assuming to find himself some lower hanging fruit.)

Why is it that only officers are concerned about my "unusual-ness?" Oh, and possibly criminals.

I was walking my dog in my previous dwelling (a condo across the street from the Rio). It was 10:30 p.m., dark, cold and a little rainy (December). I'm on the phone with my friend when this man pulls over next to me in this pimped-out car with tinted windows. He lowers his window and said something. I put my phone down a bit, turned toward him. I said, "Are you talking to me?"

He glanced at my gun and said, "No." Rolls the dark-ass window back up and moves on... (I'm assuming to find himself some lower hanging fruit.)

Is there a connection between criminals and cops? Just asking, not accusing.

It should be the police that are disarmed, not the private citizen.

So what should she have done instead of standing and quietly waiting for the police to finish what is (going by the video) apparently a traffic stop? Turn and run the other way, thus acting suspiciously? Push past the cops after invading their space? Jaywalk?

Wearing a gun in an open carry state is no different, legally, than wearing shoes. Until she draws it or uses it, no crime is committed, nor is there a reasonable suspicion that one is about to be. Nor is carrying a camera a crime. Free exercise of guaranteed rights isn't the least bit "nutty". If wearing a holstered pistol is proof of wrongdoing, one has to note that those cops are also wearing holstered pistols. Unlike their victim, they are acting in an irresponsible and unlawful way.

Yes, I said victim. That is, after all, the proper term for someone who is the target of a felony (18USC241, 18USC242 make it a crime to use official authority to violate not one but two constitutional rights, after all; Putting your hand on a deadly weapon while charging at someone is a threat of deadly force, making their violation a felony-level offense).

Putting someone in handcuffs is certainly use of force to deny constitutional rights; The fact they eventually let her go simply proves it was unjustified. If their actions were justified, then it would also be justified for a citizen to make a citizen's arrest on the same grounds; After all, how do you KNOW that's a real cop, not someone in a realistic fake uniform, without arresting them and calling it in?

If I had been the one to handcuff a civilian while open carrying (like cops do) I'd be in prison.

Awe shucks J Spin. You were doing so well too. At least you didn't recommend physical abuse against THIS woman.

Yet here you go insulting innocent victims AND admitting in public that you would illegally arrest them. Just for exercising their civil rights.

You know what a civil right is don't you? I kid. Of course you don't. Go back to your nap now supervisor.

Good old enemy of the Constitution, citizens, common decency, and cops everywhere... Here's Johnny Spin!!!

p.s. Thank you for this gem too J Spin Law:

"I would probably done the same thing as the officers in this video until I figured out what this woman was up to."

This is so precious coming from an unemployable middle aged man wearing a greasy wife beater. Posting from the dank gloom of his mommy's basement while fingering his anus.

"This is so precious coming from an unemployable middle aged man wearing a greasy wife beater. Posting from the dank gloom of his mommy's basement while fingering his anus."

You stay classy San Diego.

Because trolling the internet as a fake cop while incessantly advocating gross violations of just about every Constitutional Right we have is endearing.

Ouch. That was harsh even by MY standards. :)

Well thanks for the compliment! Nice to see you over here.

Don't worry about Johnny Spin. He has no soul. He does however condone physical abuse against innocent women, violent take downs of anything on the planet that moves and breathes, sleeping in his patrol car, stealing work supplies, and using his crime computer for personal use.

And as you can see here he has a completely irrational hatred for the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, the color yellow for some reason, the Pledge of Allegiance, Rom Coms, puppies, any and every civilian on the planet, reason, logic, straight porn, Velcro, photography/photographers, and egg whites.

And hippies.

Here we go again with good old "Johnny (I'll spin it any way I can) Law"!

Even though he doesn't say it directly, it's still interpreted as..

"Cops Can Do NO Wrong!"

Rail Car Fan

It is sad that you admit that you would violate my friend Tiger Lily's rights like these scum did. While this alrecation was in proggress I talked with the black officer, on the phone he admitted that OCing is legal, could not cite law for providing registration, (there is none) and drew a blank when I asked him to cite the law on video in public. He then said he arested her for "officer safety" I asked him what the probable cause was, and he said "officer safety" I then cited the definition of probable cause, and he suggested I call Lt. Young.

(Probable cause exists when the facts and circumstances known to the officer would warrant a prudent man to believe that a crime had been comitted and the accused had comitted the crime.)

The Open carry article is about a year old now Both of the people interviewed in the article are Guerrilla Lawfare mambers, and one has moved to Florida, to make a difference

jn

citizens exercising their right to observe are now nutty got it

Carlos Miller - Photography is Not a Crime
Pixiq Expert

I just updated the story with that video.

Hi, I'm the one that took the vid. Couple of things:

1. Had I known about the guy that got kicked in the face in my own "back yard," I might not have been so bold.

2. The "woman" you see in the background was a little girl. That's why I blurred her face - and it was not an easy thing for me to do!

Here's what happened:

I live across the street from a high school and I almost always open carry. Mainly, the oc activists in town have done a great job teaching LVMPD their job - knowing that it is LEGAL to open carry in Nevada. In a nutshell, all you need to OC is to be at least 18, be a U.S. Citizen, and not be a felon.

At about 1pm I saw a Clark County School District (CCSD) car detaining someone. I figured it was a simple traffic stop since it was "school zone" be-extra-slow time.

After 2pm I noticed the same cop, cop car, and suspect. Only this time the suspect was standing behind the cop's car and was in handcuffs.

So I went home, told my husband I was going for a walk with the dog, and made sure to take my cam, just in case I get some crap for open carrying. (I'm new in the neighborhood.) As I walked out the house I left a msg on my friend, Dave's, phone telling him that I was going for a walk and checking out something that looked suspicious.

I stayed on my side of the street (across from the high school) and walked toward the incident. I walked right by the African American cop when my dog needed to pee. So I stopped and figured the cop saw my gun. I also noticed there was a little girl in the back seat of the suspect's car. (If you look closely you'll see she was carrying her school backpack.) It appeared the cop had arrested the "dad?"

I started walking forward and a number of scenarios ran through my head - like what happened? Did this cop abuse his authority? Then I see another cop car arrive and he parked behind the other two cars. I looked forward and decided that since I was wearing my flip flops I didn't want to walk what felt like it was half a mile to legally cross the street. I figured the one cop already saw I was open carrying so "Jaywalking" would be fantastic probable cause to mess with me. So I decided to return. As I got closer I made a conscientious decision to video what I was seeing - the second cop appeared to have gotten there to do something with the little girl.

That's when I took out my cam and the cop in the car hollered out to the cop on the sidewalk to say, "the lady's got a camera - over there, the lady with the camera."

That's when you see them coming at me with their hands on their guns giving me unlawful orders.

Couple of notes:

I've never been in trouble with the law, and never been handcuffed (not even for fun.)

Right after I got cuffed, the cop took my gun despite my "I DO NOT CONSENT!" objections. He took it anyway and I said, "YOU HAD BETTER NOT SWEEP ME!" The cop actually did a good job maneuvering my .45, took the magazine out, and the bullet out of the chamber.

Then he ordered me to SIT ON THE CURB. I absolutely refused and told the cop, "you're gonna have to shove me to the ground. And since I've got a gigantic hemorrhoid in my ass, you'll probably make me bleed to death." The guy looked stunned and told me, "Well, then, just stand back against the wall. I was squealing like a stuck pig asking them if they were rookies or something. The White cop said, "I've been a police officer for 12 years." The other didn't say anything.

I kept asking why they were doing this and the words "officer safety" kept coming up. The 12-year cop kept saying, "We have a right to be safe." I kept correcting him saying, "While you're wearing a gun and a badge you have ZERO RIGHTS! You have AUTHORITY. I'M the one with the rights ... rights that you're violating!"

Then my friend, Dave, called me back and I managed to swing my hand over to my pocket to get the call. I hollered into my pocket to Dave, "I'm being handcuffed. Call Burl!" (my husband of 29 years.)

The Black cop said, "Hey lady, you didn't have to do that." So I asked the cop if he'd talk to my friend. And he did.

Then the boss, Sgt. Valdez, showed up and tried to bully me. I wasn't giving them any info. I heard someone say "Did you run the number on the gun?" I said, "I DO NOT CONSENT TO YOU GUYS RUNNING MY NUMBER!"

They kept asking me over and over what my name is. I only said, "Lily." The Black cop got on the phone and it was like he was searching for any wanted "Lily" in the entire universe that matched my description.

Then a metro officer showed up and tried to get me to talk. I did not reply to the following questions:

How much education do you have?
Did you go to high school?
Did you graduate from high school?
Any college (asking as if that was ridiculous).

I know I have the right to remain silent - just not the ability. Cause I exploded when he said this,

"The United States Constitution says you have a right to bear arms. Do you know what amendment that is?"

I said, "DON'T CONDESCEND TO ME YOU CLOWN! I'M OLD ENOUGH TO BE YOUR MOTHER!"

He took a couple of quick blinks and went away for a bit.

Then he came back to try to explain to me how difficult his job is. I said, "I have a quiz for YOU. Which amendment says I have the right to remain silent? GET ME A LAWYER NOW!!!"

He said I didn't need a lawyer cause I wasn't being arrested. I said, "I'm the one in the handcuffs - I WANT A LAWYER!"

Then the CCSC sgt hollered out to me, "You're in big trouble. Your gun is not registered. We're bringing up charges with the attorney general."

I laughed and said, "You boys are either dyslexic or stupid. Do what you're threatening and I'll be LIVING IN YOUR HOUSE!"

Then again someone begged me to just give them my full name. Just then the Black cop triumphantly declares: GONZALEZ, HER NAME IS LILY GONZALEZ.

I never admitted that I was Lily Gonzalez. But I did say, "So.... my gun IS registered."

My husband and son both showed up at the last 2-3 minutes of my handcuffing. The Metro cop was bs-ing my husband telling him how dangerous it is to pull people over. He made it appear like I was interfering with them. Dave says it's called, "Damage control." And my husband felt sorry for THEM. Are you kidding me? I'm thinking - dude, it was I in the handcuffs. Me. Your wife. But he probably thought I was a bully and made them feel stupid. (I was and I did.)

There is something extremely powerful to be able to dominate four cops with guns and badges.... even while handcuffed.

There is quite a bit more that transpired during those 56 minutes. And much more that has transpired since.

You will all be interested to know that I can prove some of what I'm saying. Remember they made me stand back against the wall? Well I flustered them up so much that they forgot I still had my cam. And although most of what you can see is my ass and the wall, I've got a lot of what I just reported ON TAPE!

Thanks for posting my vid on your blog. And I hope to visit it more. You guys are my kind of men!

TL

The cops were still in the wrong to order her to put the camera down and especially to handcuff her for almost an hour. She was not holding the gun, it was holstered. I believe police can question someone that is open carrying to make sure the weapon is not loaded. Cops still overreacted.

You can open carry a loaded weapon in Nevada. Why would anyone carry an unloaded weapon around? Cops can ask her to see her registration card. Handguns have to be registered in Clark County.

http://www.nraila.org/statelawpdfs/NVSL.pdf

Only in California are you required to keep your openly carried firearm unloaded. The story in question is from Nevada.

Where the incident occurred, a police officer can stop a person who is open carrying, and ask to inspect their weapon registration card (city law requiring all firearms to be registered) and the weapon, to verify that the carried weapon matches the registration. But that doesn't require nearly an hour in handcuffs, or a demand to turn off and/or put away a camera. As a camera is hardly a weapon, and she'd have had to drop either the leash or the camera to draw her gun, the police having their hands on their own guns cannot be justified.

The fact they turned their backs on their own traffic stop, when statistically speaking, a cop is most likely to be shot during such a stop out of all the various things they regularly do, makes even less sense.

"The fact they turned their backs on their own traffic stop, when statistically speaking, a cop is most likely to be shot during such a stop out of all the various things they regularly do, makes even less sense."

Good point. We kind of see them start the stop with the person they pulled over. The suspect is out of the car, hasn't been searched or handcuffed for the officers 'protection' and they are after someone else that's pointing a camera at them, because they are pointing a camera at them. Good way to get shot in the back.

Like I said they need a couple of weeks off without pay to start.

Bergman said: "Where the incident occurred, a police officer can stop a person who is open carrying, and ask to inspect their weapon registration card (city law requiring all firearms to be registered) and the weapon, to verify that the carried weapon matches the registration."

*************

In Nevada, open carry does not constitute probable cause to search. Any cop can ask for anything they want. And they get us to comply by tricking or bullying. We are not required by law to comply to any unlawful order. When we cave to "inquiries" and "requests" then we're setting ourselves up to be violated.

The only reason a cop might approach to ask a question is to find probable cause. Therefore, the question to always ask to just about any cop question is, "Am I being detained?" If the answer is "NO" then ask, "Am I free to go?"

It's a game that I've learned through the effective teachings of Guerrilla Lawfare.

Oh, here's a new GL tactic I just used at the Laughlin River Run this weekend. (I was violated there for taking pics of cops abusing law-abiding citizens - a you-tube on that one is forthcoming)

When I was getting the serious demon-like skunk eye by an officer, I called my son to make sure my camera was streaming on-line. Very effective, no lying required. Two can play the "trickery" game.

Wow you are pretty smart. Do you have a job or any hobbies other than going around bothering police officers while they try to do their job?

Oh and yeah police work isn't dangerous at all. These recent videos prove it:

http://www.officer.com/news/10261879/wisconsin-officers-cleared-in-fatal...

http://www.officer.com/video/10255116/video-conroe-texas-officer-shot

I love it when an crotchety old lady out walking her dog tries to act like she knows jack about how dangerous police work is.

I love it when a bootlicking wanna be cop refutes hard statistics with two examples of arguably questionable value. As if public employees on the taxpayer dime with no market signals, insulated with powers beyond the taxpaying citizen, performing "services" that the person on the receiving end usually doesn't want and was forced to pay for, is a selfless hero.

Government is the lowest calling of work on earth. Those that can, work, and those that can't, regulate through government those that can.

Well crap. I was all set to fire up the keyboard... No need now.

That's some fine work Jesse.

I just want to add that the most dangerous threat in Johnny Loves-to-Troll's life is him getting kicked out of his mommy's basement. Or worse yet his mommy demanding he shower, put on a tie, and look for a job.

JL,

Which one of these jobs is more dangerous than being a police officer? I'm going to give you a bunch of choices and the average wage if it's available, this is a test you can't fail at.
A) Fishing $13/hr
B) Logging $13/hr
C) Aircraft Pilots and Flight Engineer
D) Iron Worker $19/hr
E) Framer or Rancher
F) Power Line Workers $22/hr
G) Truck Driver or other Driver $12/hr
H) Garbage Man $17/hr

Because there isn't a single wrong answer to chose from. All of those jobs are more dangerous than being a police officer.

When you get the answer let us know.

Another interesting statistic is that there are about 150 officer deaths a year, most from traffic incidents about 60%. Yet the same number of police officers generates about 4,900 reports of police misconduct with 6,600 different sworn officers involved.

No one is saying that police work is 'safe', to be honest I don't know what 'safe' is. No matter what you do there is some risk. I guess police work is 'dangerous' compared to being a doctor working in a hospital but it's 'safe' compared to being a truck driver or fisherman.

One thing we do know is the general public is 'safer' around fisherman then they are around police officers. You are far more likely to be a victim of sexual misconduct or excessive force at the hands of a police officer as compared to a fisherman. Also a fisherman never falsely arrested anyone.

The problem is the police are so busy policing us that they have forgotten to police their own rank and file.

The difference is police work involves having to knowingly try to interact with dangerous subjects and put yourself in harms way. There is a bank robbery in progress with shots fired? Police go towards the sound of gunfire. There is a drunken brawl? Police go to break it up.

Hmm falling off a roof or being shot while trying to arrest an armed robber? Do you see a difference?

I understand that you have no respect for what the police do (even though I doubt you have the courage to do it yourself) but the general public understands that the officers risk their lives trying to make society safer. Take another look at those two videos. Would you stand there and interact with a guy with a gun or run the other way?

There is a reason why we have a police memorial in DC and why there are books and movies about police all the time. People understand there is something different about a profession where people risk their lives for others even if you don't.

The "courage" to do it ourselves?

If by "courage" you mean "spent a lot of time in detention as a kid".

Police officers are the biggest criminal element in society today.

And no, "people" do not understand there is something different about police. Politicians do though. They understand there is a powerful police union that will make their lives hell if they don't allow police to influence the law (conflict of interest), their own pay (conflict of interest), and just generally pander to them because after all, it is the cops who are the muscle for the politicians when the citizens get tired of their betters lording it over them.

As has been stated before, police risk their lives very little statistically, compared to many of us who produce a good or perform a service that people freely choose to buy without having a gun put in their face.

Cops never produce a meal for the hungry or shelter for the exposed or chothing for the naked. In general they do however deny all these things to people they don't like on a regular basis.

"And no, "people" do not understand there is something different about police."

Really? I get thanked by the public on a regular basis. I've also had my meals paid for by random citizens several times. I didn't even have to draw my gun to do it. That must really piss you off.

"Cops never produce a meal for the hungry or shelter for the exposed or chothing for the naked."

Nope but I have had to roll around in the mud with a car thief and I've been shot at by an angry drunk who was firing his shotgun in a crowded neighborhood. Does that count?

Keep up the self-congratulations tax-feeder.

Both of those situations could have been handled by the free market and reasonable, armed private citizens rather than by someone paid with forcibly extracted tax dollars and inordinate power with little oversight and a police union to always and forever defend any and all misconduct.

"Both of those situations could have been handled by the free market and reasonable, armed private citizens..."

Are you serious? Well once good thing about this site is that it can be very entertaining once the kooks start posting.

An armed citizen may stop a robbery in progress that they walk into the middle of. I don't see how they would coordinate a measured response including containment at the scene, negotiation, and investigation after the fact.

How about sex crimes and DNA testing? A stolen car chase?

How would they handle a kidnapping across city and county lines? A NCIC for the public? Your idea fails in so many ways it must be a joke.

jn

yea the price of a meal means you're worshiped. does your dept. condone gratuities? what are you a fuckin waiter?

JL,

Hmm... falling off a roof and getting killed or driving in a car and getting killed. No actually I don't see much difference. Since the most dangerous part of police work is driving.

Lots of people knowingly interact with dangerous subjects and put themselves in harms way. Police work doesn't have a monopoly on that. I also don't see anything you mentioned being a reason to give the 6,600 that were involved in some kind of nefarious activity a pass.

The Navy, Marines, Army, Air Force and Coast Guard all go towards the sound of gunfire and risk their lives to make the world safer. As do photojournalist, reporters and others. I've been in the Navy. JL, you don't know what I'd do or what I've done.

I do see lots of people that cops have hurt. As I said and you have just pointed out you're so busy patting yourselves on the back you have forgotten to police yourselves. That has nothing to do with respect or lack of it.

Now if the police unions spent as much time trying to remove bad cops from the job as they do trying to educate us about why bad cops deserve a break cops would get a lot more respect from everyone. You've allowed your house to become rotten and you need to fix it by removing all the rotten wood.

"Hmm... falling off a roof and getting killed or driving in a car and getting killed. No actually I don't see much difference. Since the most dangerous part of police work is driving."

So let's just ignore the officers murdered while handling emergencies, arresting suspects, or transporting prisoners?

As I said before, the public understands the fact that police knowingly and intentionally deal with violent people who may kill them. You can ignore this but you are the minority.

"The Navy, Marines, Army, Air Force and Coast Guard all go towards the sound of gunfire and risk their lives to make the world safer. As do photojournalist, reporters and others. I've been in the Navy. JL, you don't know what I'd do or what I've done."

Thanks for your service. I was in the army. I also put the military in the same, if not higher, category as police and fire fighters. All of them risk their lives and put themselves in harms way to help others, not to get a big load of crabs out of the ocean.

"I do see lots of people that cops have hurt. As I said and you have just pointed out you're so busy patting yourselves on the back you have forgotten to police yourselves."

Do you ever see officers get hurt? Or does that not matter?

JL,

The point is there aren't that many officers murdered in the line of duty. I'm not saying to ignore them, but cops murder more people (I hate to use the term civilians because that's what cops are also) while on the job by a factor of about 5. So we should give the cops that committed those murders a pass because they deal with dangerous people.

You are trying to assign a higher value to the life of a cop than to the life of a fisherman. I'm sure if we ask the dead fisherman's family how they feel about the lose they feel the same was as the cops family. I don't know how to assign value to any life. Everyone deserves to live as long as they can. I also don't believe in medical care at any cost to prolong a life.

Cops as a rule have spent a lot of time, money and effort as a group over time to build systems to protect the rotten wood among them. It has gotten to the point that it's out of control and there is so much rotten wood that the house is in danger of falling down. It's time to make an effort to remove the rotten wood and replace it.

You also seem to advocate that cops also be judge, jury and executioner. The beauty of judicial systems based on English Law is that these functions are all separated. The premise of the tv drama "Law and Order". Cops have a patrol, investigatory and apprehension roll.

The courts try the fact of the matter and assign the punishment. The punishment is carried out by the penal system.

One other thing I'll leave you with is that respect is something you give, not something you can demand. When you can understand this simple statement a lot of things will make more sense to you and you'll find you'll enjoy your job a lot more.

" I'm not saying to ignore them, but cops murder more people (I hate to use the term civilians because that's what cops are also) while on the job by a factor of about 5. So we should give the cops that committed those murders a pass because they deal with dangerous people."

I'm curious as to what you think the word "murder" means. The majority of police related deaths are completely legal and justifiable. Are there bad incidents like those NO PD turds? Of course but if you are just going to lump everything as "murder" then there is no point in even discussing it. I'm sorry if the police are better shots that most bad guys and that makes the number of police vs criminal deaths in favor of the cops.

"You are trying to assign a higher value to the life of a cop than to the life of a fisherman. I'm sure if we ask the dead fisherman's family how they feel about the lose they feel the same was as the cops family. I don't know how to assign value to any life"

You are trying to minimize the risks a police officer knowingly takes while performing his duties. Yeah I think it is more worthy of recognition when a police officer is killed trying to apprehend a criminal than if a trucker fell asleep at the wheel while hauling a load of shoes to Topeka. The military recognizes such actions with medals. By your definition, everyone deserves the Medal of Honor.

"Cops as a rule have spent a lot of time, money and effort as a group over time to build systems to protect the rotten wood among them."

Baloney. The problem is that you and I completely disagree on what is misconduct. My department's internal affairs office is proactive about disciplining officers and there are no free rides. Your perception is because you don't understand the reality of police procedures and you can't understand why it is often necessary for police to use force. I think you just need to educate yourself more. Perhaps ride-outs or attend a citizen police academy.

"You also seem to advocate that cops also be judge, jury and executioner. The beauty of judicial systems based on English Law is that these functions are all separated. The premise of the tv drama "Law and Order". Cops have a patrol, investigatory and apprehension roll."

When did I advocate this?

"One other thing I'll leave you with is that respect is something you give, not something you can demand. When you can understand this simple statement a lot of things will make more sense to you and you'll find you'll enjoy your job a lot more."

Strange statement for you to make since I love my job and couldn't imagine doing anything else. I consider myself to be respectful out on the street. However when I need to, I am prepared to use as much force as necessary to get the job done and go home safely. The same goes for all the guys under me. I tell them to be professional but to take care of business when they need to.

'I consider myself to be respectful out on the street. However when I need to..."

What utter bullshit.

You have shown not one iota of respect for TigerLily. And she did ABSOLUTELY NOTHING wrong. You have absolutely no respect for or understanding of the Constitution.

Keep romancing on about cops though. Maybe one day you will meet one on line. Then you could actually put on a clean shirt and pants, leave the basement, and date him.

Wait a sec. You are talking about being respectful? Hell that is absolutely hilarious.

You have about as much right to talk about showing someone respect as hal has about correcting someone's grammar. Go back to making homophobic insults and stop trying to pretend you know jack about acting respectful.

Wait a sec.

The EVER present TROLL completely side steps the issue. Surprise surprise.

News Flash spank monkey:

No one else here is pretending to be a cop. No one else is an ever lovin' cop sycophant. You will get no respect from me Johnny Lair, usurper of the Constitution.

So show us Johnny how respectful you are. Apologize to TigerLily. After all if you were a real cop you would know she is your boss.

Spank monkey? Fingering anuses?

And you are calling me a troll? That is as amusing as you lecturing people about showing respect.

Keep showing everyone how much of an internet tough guy you are. I'm sure we are all very impressed by your 16 yr old x-box insults.

Post new comment

Pixiq on Facebook

Join the 10148 Pixiq fans on Facebook

Share

  • Share

Subscribe

Get weekly updates from Pixiq. Short, sweet, and always interesting.