Madness continues in the United Kingdom
At the age of 15, freelance photographer Jules Mattsson can teach adult photographers a thing or two about standing up for your rights to take photos in public.
The English lad was on assignment taking pictures of police cadets lining up for a parade in London Saturday when he was confronted by several officers who accused him of terrorism, pedophilia and general all-around anti-social behavior (which is the British way of saying you should be locked up).
In pure English irony, the parade was part of Armed Forces Day, described by The Independent as “a new event that was created last year amid criticism that the country didn’t do enough to honor its military.”
Obviously having the press ignore the parade is a displaying the ultimate honor.
This is how Mattsson explained it on his blog:
The incident started when I took an image (not a very good one it seems :p) of a Police Cadet unit forming up to take part in an Armed Forces Day parade. I was quickly and aggressively stopped by one of their adult officers asking me who I worked for. I responded that I was a freelance and upon being told I needed parental permission to photograph them, I explained this was a public event in a public place and that I didn’t for editorial use.
She then demanded my details and when I declined, I was quickly pulled aside by police officers. Then started recording, see below for the rest
I had my lens covered while trying to photograph my harassment , then told ‘I consider you a threat under the terrorism act’ for photographing a police officer, had my camera taken from around my neck, was detained and frog marched away before being pushed down some stairs and told they were concerned for my safety
Mattsson had the sense and courage to record the conversation and continue taking photos as he demanded to know under what law was he not allowed to take photos. Check out the above video to hear the audio and see the photos.
As insane as some laws are in the United Kingdom, at least they don’t equate recording a public conversation with a public official to illegal wiretapping.
Mattsson not only did an excellent job documenting the harassment, but he has done a great job of keeping the story alive on his blog by continually posting updates, including a statement from the police spokeswoman.
“It is clearly not the intention of the MPS to prevent people from taking photographs, although, as the public would expect, officers will remain vigilant, particularly in crowded public places. Any allegations or complaints about police treatment of photographers are taken very seriously by the MPS.”
She adds: “Anyone who is unhappy with the actions of individual police officers can make a formal complaint, which will be thoroughly investigated. Although at this time we have not received a complaint about this incident and no allegations of crime have been made, we will investigate the circumstances. Our officers do receive guidance around the issue of photography through briefings and internal communications and we continue to drive this work forward.”
Meanwhile, a photographer and videographer each won £3,500 ($5,275) in damages after police prevented them from documenting a protest outside the Greek Embassy in 2008 (video of that incident below).
According to the Guardian:
In letters sent to the journalists, the force said: “The [Met] confirms its recognition that freedom of the press is a cornerstone of democracy and that journalists have a right to report freely. [We] recognise that on 8 December 2008 they failed to respect press freedom in respect of Mr (Marc) Vallée and Mr (Jason) Parkinson.” Both men received £3500 in compensation.
After the altercation, the journalists were forcibly frogmarched away from the scene to a location they said they were unable to report from. Both men believe police were preventing them from witnessing a series of what appeared to be aggressive arrests of activists taking place the same time.
And last week, another photographer was harassed in London under the terrorism laws when taking photographs with a tripod in public.
Things are getting so bad in the U.K. that Amateur Photographer magazine will give out a free lens cloth (right) in next month’s issue that state the rules for public photography to hand out to cops when they begin harassing photographers.
I doubt that will prevent them from continuing their harassment but it should make for interesting video as they try to explain why the rules, which were drafted by the top police brass, are not valid.
Olympus' Micro Four Thirds 75mm prime
Can you fix the focus on a blurry photo after the fact?
The birth of Mirrorless Cameras
The Joy Of Winning A Photo Contest
Choosing your first dSLR camera
New York City can be beautiful!
Choosing the Right Light Stand
Photojojo iPhone Telephoto Lens review — AudioCast
My week with Q
How To Become A Successful Photographer
"When the Wind Stopped" — poem with 4 photos
Creating The New Family Portrait
Tips for Textures
Cast aways - saving those photographic memories
One Man Show: My 25 Years With Digital Photography
Studio, Flash, & Available Light — Three Books Reviewed
Portrait styling: dangerous pairings
Adobe Photoshop CS6 Product Managers Interview Audiocast
A gift of flowers: unfold your senses
On Set of "Love & Robots" the Film
No-Brainer Setup For A Digital Photo Frame Exhibit - Part 3











Planning “National Geographic” style photo travel
Wilderness Travel 1 Rainforests – Essential Gear
Backlighting Basics
What Moves You?
FIGURES IN MOTION: Decades of Evolving Personal Imagery in Photography, Part 7
Lomography Store, Austin, Texas — GALLERY
GALLERY — Up to $1,000 Reward for Cattle Rustlers
25% off on photography eBooks
eyePhone: The eBook for iPhone Photographers
Interview with Harold Davis — Closeup Maestro of Flowers & Water Drops
Interview with Steve Caplin — Photoshop Digital Artist, Commercial Illustrator, & Author
A Brief History Of Light & Photography: Part 3 of 3
A Brief History Of Light & Photography: Part 2 Of 3
Easy technique to select, edit and sequence keywords for web
How much should you charge for a photograph?

























Comments
Carlos, it’s not the UK as a whole. Most of the trouble is confined to England, mostly in the London metro area. According to what I’ve been told by someone I know in Scotland, Scotland’s police departments don’t bother harassing photographers. The London PD obviously doesn’t care about following its’ own directives.
England has been doing this ever since 9/11. They invoke terrorism, or “anti-social behavior” whenever they get put on the spot for not knowing the laws. Ten years ago, if someone asked me to take a trip to England with them, I would have automatically agreed. Now, I’m afraid I’ll be harrassed for taking tourism photos, and my smart ass mouth will not help my situation. No thanks England.
A web site needs to be set up,
” Boycot UK Tourism”
And every event like this needs to be listed and Officers names as reason why no one should spend their money to hoilday there.
Why hasn’t the State Department issued a travel advisory for London/UK?
Bravo young man. Too bad they will probably get away with it.
mepsipax recently posted..Is that my superpower
Carlos, is it just me, just now, realising that the ONLY PHRASE WE NEED TO REPEAT IS:
Whistleblower Protection.
Say it with me everybody (Wooo!)
Whistleblower Protection.
Whistleblower Protection.
Whistleblower Protection.
Whistleblower Protection.
Whistleblower Protection.
Whistleblower Protection.
Whistleblower Protection.
Whistleblower Protection.
Whistleblower Protection.
etc.
Oh, everybody do a google on “Whistleblower Protection” and see if there are lawyers and law scholars and law workers that haven’t made the cross-connection to public photography issues yet.
I actually tried to link you to this story yesterday, Carlos, but was unable to do so under the “CONTACT” tab. It gave me some error message. Since I can’t contact you that way, I’ll ask you here if you have any ideas as to what might be the problem.
I really just do not get it. Can someone please explain to me why the police seem to hate photographers with every fiber of their being?
I mean, it seems like they would rather crawl a mile through hot coals and broken glass to harrass/arrest an innocent photographer than arrest a murderer standing right next to them with a signed confession and a “please arrest me” sign pinned to them.
Because the photographer can expose there corruption and misconduct, and they know it.
QFT.
Yes indeed public exposes them. We the public are the only force that polices the police and they’d rather go about their shady business in the shadows.
One of these days the filth is going to fuck with a photographer who decides they won’t take any shit, these dumbfucking cops are asking for it and one day they are going to get it. You reap what you sow.
Jody recently posted..Krugman Warns of Depression
it is immoral to take pictures of fully dressed children on a public street. Its moral to teach those same children that killing in the name of a fascist police state is just GROOVY BABY.
I think I’d find a new home for those pointy hats.
Jody recently posted..Krugman Warns of Depression
There’s a reason why 1984, Fahrenheit 451 and many similar movies originate in England.
Because many law enforcement agencies in the US are just as guilty as the UK when it comes to harassing photographers.
Look at this: http://www.politics.co.uk/news/legal-and-constitutional/govt-stop-and-search-appeal-rejected-$21381052.htm
“The decision means that a January 2010 court judgement which found section 44 of the Terrorism Act to be illegal is final.”
Thanks for the support, good post This is a great blog, always good to see people fighting this in other countries as well
The reason this does not stop is the brass do not want it stooped. They give lip service and state how they try to educate the officers etc and how it is ” misunderstood”and they will circulate memos etc. And it goes on, because they really do nothing.
They do nothing because they intend to do nothing, they want this to go on, and the street cops know it. All they need do is inform all to stop or be fired, it would be stooped.
As I said, the brass wants it.
Jules good for you for standing up for yourself and for what is right!
Post new comment