Man Photographing Grandson In Park Deemed Suspicious By Police And Media
The older, white man was seen photographing children in a public park in Idaho, so it didn’t take long for an overprotective mother to chase him off.
She then called the cops, who in turn alerted the media, who quickly posted articles warning citizens about this dangerous man lurking in the park with his camera, running off after being confronted.
It turns out, the man was just photographing his grandson.
And the only reason he left the park was because the woman was yelling at him.
So police had to redact their statement to the media.
This is how LocalNews8 originally reported the story.
Pocatello Police are warning people of a suspicious man spotted taking pictures of children at Ammon Park.
Police say parents spotted the man photographing their kids, and when they confronted him the man ran off.
He is described as an older white man with white hair and a beard. He was wearing a western-style button-down shirt and blue jeans and was driving a tan/brown van.
If anyone has information about this man, police would like them to call police dispatch at 234-6100.
And this is how they explained it afterward in the updated version.
Lt. Paul Manning said the man in question called in the Pocatello Police Department himself, saying he was at the park taking pictures of his grandson. The man also said that he did not run away, but simply walked away from a woman who had gotten very close to him and was yelling at him. Manning said police are no longer worried about the man and he is not suspicious.
The hysteria of adults photographing children in public has reached epidemic proportions.
Earlier this week, we reported on a New York man who was threatened by a mom's boyfriend, then warned by cops not to take photos of the woman's kid, even though it was never proven that he had taken photos of her kid.
And before that, a pair of photographers were told they were not allowed to photograph children swimming in the frog pond at Boston Common, which Boston Common later apologized for on its Facebook page.
And earlier this year, New Jersey lawmakers tried to pass a law that would have made it illegal to photograph children in public without parental consent.
Last year in the United Kingdom, a man was accused of pedophilia for photographing his son in a mall.
In 2008, a UK man was called a "pervert" for photographing his own kids in a park.
If parents are so worried about pedophiles, then they should look within their own families or circle of friends, not the stranger with the camera.
According to Wikipedia, which always cites their research:
Offenders are more likely to be relatives or acquaintances of their victim than strangers.[98] A 2006–2007 Idaho study of 430 cases found that 82% of juvenile sex offenders were known to the victims (acquaintances 46% or relatives 36%).[99][100]
We have to accept the fact that kids are part of society. If you take them out in public, there's a chance they might be photographed. Just as any adult might be photographed.
The real issue is how these parents become aggressive towards photographers as we have seen.
I'm not a parent but I know some parents speak boldly about what they would do if they caught somebody photographing their kid.
I can assure them that I would not back down if confronted. I guarantee that. I'll even wait for the cops to get there while videotaping the whole interaction.
But I do try to avoid photographing kids for this reason. And frankly, unless it's a good photojournalistic photo (or if I'm with family and friends), I have no desire to photograph kids anyway.
But I will also not be the one to run away if confronted by one of these self-righteous parents.
And I doubt I'm alone.
So only time will tell before one of these parents gets arrested for assault.
Below is a screenshot of the LocalNews8 story in case they also remove it from their site.

Keep track of your camera with CameraTrace
The most photogenic festivals in the world
Red eyes and how to avoid them
A love story
Nikon PB4 Bellows Reborn
Worlds Fastest Camera
Photojojo iPhone Telephoto Lens review — AudioCast
Photo Accessories that Fail Security Checks
My week with Q
Studio equipment buying guide for beginners
VSCO Film Studio Review
The wild blue yonder of straight horizons
Photo Tips
Shoot with Love
Photographing Children in the wedding party
One Man Show: My 25 Years With Digital Photography
Sheer Heaven: Valentine Day Photo Techniques
How to Use Multiple Lights for Dramatic Portraits
Making your own flash diffuser
Software Review: Tiffen Dfx 3.0 Suite
LR4 free presets: Faded series
A gift of flowers: unfold your senses
On Set of "Love & Robots" the Film
My Night with Ilford Galerie Gold Silk Fibre
FOTOMOTO - Why I Left











25 Wedding Photos That Break the Mould
Silhouettes & Photo Contests
Cyan, not just another color
Our 26 best photo projects of 2011
Family Ties That Bind
Animal Group Portraits
Gallery: Embedded with the Territorial Army
10 case studies in exposure for outdoor photography
How to photograph Lord of the Rings landscapes
Interview with Vincent Laforet — Photo Journalist, Commercial Photographer, & Film Maker
Interview with Photographer Martin Evening - Photographer and Photoshop Author
A Brief History Of Light & Photography: Part 3 of 3
A Brief History Of Light & Photography: Part 2 Of 3
Decades of Evolving Personal Imagery in Photography
Lightroom Interview: Kevin Tieskoetter
Easy technique to select, edit and sequence keywords for web
How much should you charge for a photograph?




































Comments
Carlos! This article really makes me sick. What's wrong with American people nowadays?
But...but...it's for the CHILDREN!!!
The Children!
Don't you love the Children?
You MUST give up all your rights to protect the Children or your not an American.
I wonder if that woman could be sued for libel. One thing for sure, I would've yelled right back at that woman and dared her to call the police for photographing my own grandson.
i wonder if the cunt in question apologized to the old guy? maybe he should have her arrested for verbal assault or some trumped up bullshit!
Just updated this story with new info. It's obvious we have reached an epidemic.
Where will it stop? When photographers learn their rights and are not afraid to back down?
Joey Boots knew his rights last year while videotaping the ballerina in Times Square.
http://www.pixiq.com/article/horny-videographer-ruins-nyc-photo-shoot
The story on KPVI is still there. The link might have changed with the update, but its still listed on their site as one of their most popular stories. Here is the link: http://www.kpvi.com/mostpopular/story/UPDATE-Search-Ends-For-Suspicious-...
Cameras are only used by terrorists and pedophiles. It's amazing how fast these knee-jerk sheep go to get a rope at the mere accusation of catching a kid in frame. I'd rather be accused of being a gay, communist, union recruiter with a terrorism plot.
I remember reading a blog a while back about a guy who was getting flack for taking pictures of his own kids.
This will end when photographers stand their ground and the yelling cunt in question is charged with harassment and disturbing the peace.
The police shouldn't have gotten involved because no crime was committed. The station should have not reported the story not only because they didn't have all the facts, but because they of all people should know the rights of photographers.
Arggggh! Makes me want to run out and bait idiot women like the one in this incident. Hang around a public park, take pictures of kids, and vidotape any half-wit who goes apoplectic.
In fairness, there are quite a few idiot men as well, but when it comes to "don't you DARE photograph my child!", women have them well outnumbered.
I'm with you, JdL, stories like this make me want to go out there and start taking pictures. Maybe I should just print up a short, easy-to-read flyer explaining "public" to people to hand to them when they start yelling. Then I could just hand them the paper and keep taking pictures. I could make them small 3x5 cards: "Photography is not a crime. If you don't want your picture taken, do not appear in a public place, ever."
Good article, but you might want to invest in a spell checker, unless the spelling of "epidemic" has stealthily changed to "epedemic."
Ditto "porportions" and "rightous."
UPDATE : KPVI reported on the eventual outcome @ [ http://www.kpvi.com/mostpopular/story/UPDATE-Search-Ends-For-Suspicious-... ]
I shoot quite a few kids when I'm out and they are around. I seldom have problems. I usually ask both the parent and the child. However, like yesterday, it's hard to ask when they are on a carnival ride.
I did delete a photo yesterday at the fair. One mom approached me very politely, expressed her concern and requested I delete the photo. Had she approached me with anger I would not been so accommodating.
It is of course your right to choose to delete a photo when someone asks you to. I would not. Politeness and pliability are nice traits, but sticking up for basic rights trumps them in cases such as these, I believe.
Advising them that you are under no obligation to delete the photo before doing it should take care of the rights issue.
Yes, I have to agree. I do have another reason for planning to refuse (nobody has asked me yet to delete a pic), which is that I'm completely anal about having a continuous set of photo numbers from each of my cameras, no matter how bad a given picture might be. That's not an explanation that would make sense to an irate mom, I'm sure! ;-)
I've been strong-armed into deleting a photo before, which in retrospect, I shouldn't have done since the settlement would have paid for my new lenses much easier than the gig would have.
Honestly, I would not be thriled if someone with zero connection to any of the children playing in a park started taking pictures of kids. Unless he or she is updating the parks department website or studying photography or something to that effect I just would wonder why. And really I am all for the whole free range kid movement! Maybe I am self-righteous and paranoid but I would just wonder. Why bother taking pictures of other people's kids? And I might ask in a friendly way, maybe something like, "Oh, that's my son; who are you with?" or "Nice camera; how do you like it?" I don't know. That's just my thought.
This is what happens when men fail to stop bitch behavior: http://goo.gl/obiC
I think both men and women should stand up for themselves against "bitch" behavior from anyone.
...
My 13-year old grandson has "discovered" girls. On spring break he was given a camera. I did not know that he was taking pics of "hot chicks" until the Father and Mother acosted us at Cape Kennedy acusing him of every vile thing because the the boy took a pic of their daughter. They acted as if he had thrown her to the ground and raped her right there. Okay, she was only 10 - he was 13 - she was dressed very nicely (and I would not have allowed my 10 year old girl out in public with her MAKE UP and SHORT SKIRT.) I finally told them to get a life and walked away. They followed us, so we detained a worker in conversation and they parents finally left us alone. I told my grandson that while I thought they had WAY over reacted, that he is not to take pictures unless he asks permission in future.
I think you did the right thing and handled it well. I almost always ask permission when I can. It's kind of hard when shooting a crowd, however, or when kids are on a caravel ride.
See the photo of the cute little face painted girl on my post above. I asked both her and her mom's permission. Both were happy to oblige. Then I engaged both of them in a short conversation. It was fun.
Post new comment