Maybe This Is Why Cops Don't Want Us To Take Photos
Seattle cops "embarrassed" at photo of AR-15 rifle carelessly left on trunk of car

Not only does this Seattle police car appear to be parked more than 12 inches from the curb, its officers carelessly left this AR-15 rifle sitting on the trunk of the car while they ate donuts or drank gourmet coffee or whatever it is Seattle cops do when they are not abusing citizens.
A camera-carrying citizen snapped a photo, then flagged down a couple of bike-riding Seattle cops while a woman then followed the cop car around with the rifle in the back.
So gathering from the little details provided by The Stranger, is appears that the cops then returned to the car and started driving it, oblivious to the high-power rifle sitting on the trunk.
Police officials now say they are "very embarrassed" over the incident, adding that they are not sure if the gun was loaded, which means it probably was.
Keep track of your camera with CameraTrace
The most photogenic festivals in the world
Red eyes and how to avoid them
A love story
Nikon PB4 Bellows Reborn
Worlds Fastest Camera
Photojojo iPhone Telephoto Lens review — AudioCast
Photo Accessories that Fail Security Checks
My week with Q
Studio equipment buying guide for beginners
VSCO Film Studio Review
The wild blue yonder of straight horizons
Photo Tips
Shoot with Love
Photographing Children in the wedding party
One Man Show: My 25 Years With Digital Photography
Sheer Heaven: Valentine Day Photo Techniques
How to Use Multiple Lights for Dramatic Portraits
Making your own flash diffuser
Software Review: Tiffen Dfx 3.0 Suite
LR4 free presets: Faded series
A gift of flowers: unfold your senses
On Set of "Love & Robots" the Film
My Night with Ilford Galerie Gold Silk Fibre
FOTOMOTO - Why I Left











25 Wedding Photos That Break the Mould
Silhouettes & Photo Contests
Cyan, not just another color
Our 26 best photo projects of 2011
Family Ties That Bind
Animal Group Portraits
Gallery: Embedded with the Territorial Army
10 case studies in exposure for outdoor photography
How to photograph Lord of the Rings landscapes
Interview with Vincent Laforet — Photo Journalist, Commercial Photographer, & Film Maker
Interview with Photographer Martin Evening - Photographer and Photoshop Author
A Brief History Of Light & Photography: Part 3 of 3
A Brief History Of Light & Photography: Part 2 Of 3
Decades of Evolving Personal Imagery in Photography
Lightroom Interview: Kevin Tieskoetter
Easy technique to select, edit and sequence keywords for web
How much should you charge for a photograph?






























Comments
It sure looks like there's a magazine sticking out of it. (Which would mean it was loaded.)
Yes that's a magazine in the well. You could argue endlessly as to whether there were rounds in the magazine, was there a round in the chamber, was the rifle on "safe." None of that matters.
The biggest questions are why was the rifle out of its normal storage place, and why was it left lying unattended?
I don't understand Happy Tinfoil Cat's remark that "most of these guys are ex-military." For one, it ain't necessarily true, and for another, what are you implying about the military?
http://www.armytimes.com/news/2007/09/ap_snipersiraq_070924/
I said "many" I did not say "most" which of course may not be correct... but then again, I didn't say that, you did.
OK, I misquoted you. Big whoop. I stand corrected.
Still, your comment paints ex-military members with a very broad brush, especially if it's based only on the Army Times article you linked.
FWIW, Sandoval was acquitted of murder charges, but found guilty on several counts of tampering with evidence.
Vela is now serving a ten year sentence at Leavenworth.
Neither of these guys is likely to be hired by a police department anywhere.
SSG Hensley, the guy who set up Vela's victim and gave the illegal order to shoot, was acquitted of murder charges, but punished by the military without being discharged. Any police department that does background checks would know this and be unlikely to hire him.
A number of US soldiers and marines are incarcerated as a result of actions tantamount to murder while in theatre. Can you name a single police officer who's been jailed for brutality, murder or even spousal abuse?
Regarding your clarification that you said "many" rather than "most": Then would you agree with the statement that MOST police officers are NOT military veterans? Quite a number of the ones I know are slugs who could not make the grade in our all-volunteer military.
I'm not trying to be argumentative. Those guys were not only baiting, they were just shooting then leaving a drop weapon. (that's happened with cops, too)I said "baiting" which is a real military program and not just a few guys doing it, more likely several thousand, if not tens of thousands. The only quotable references of baiting I found relating to this program involved this case, so that's what I posted. It was tongue in cheek but if you want to say I'm painting the military with a broad brush, you should actually consider the people who think up programs like that and the thousands who willfully carry it out. Those are the ones giving the military a tint. Fact is, a lot of ex-military are cops, same as _most_ airline pilots.
We are really not so far apart on this matter. It just appears that we have different ways of approaching it.
In fact, something neither of us have mentioned is that a considerable percentage of police officers are also in the National Guard or military reserves.
I work with a lot of military people, some of whom are MPs. And most of the MPs are not the kind of person who is inclined to question the legality of an order, but just go ahead and carry it out. Every one of them I know has had legal problems--some involving domestic violence, others for fighting, drunk driving, etcetera. They go to extremes to avoid responsibility for this stuff because they want to keep their jobs. Now, these guys worry me, even as members of the military. Because if their National Guard units were federalized and ordered to go house-to-house seizing any weapons to be found, they would comply without a second thought.
There is a national organization of cops and military folk called the Oath Keepers, who have sworn not to do any of that stuff if ever called upon, but they are a minority, and somewhat looked down upon.
I am cautious around anyone I think is likely to view me as less than human, or having fewer rights than they. Doesn't matter whether they are cops, military, drug addicts, or simply sociopaths.
A psychiatrist would consult his DSM-IV, determine that I am "hypervigilant," and that I have a very sharp recall of the times I have been the target of violence, then write me off as someone with PTSD. I prefer to think of it as having learned from experience.
Double post. Sorry.
"Can you name a single police officer who's been jailed for brutality, murder or even spousal abuse?"
Yes. In my current home town of San Diego, a few years back a California Highway Patrol Officer named Craig Peyer was accused, charged, tried, and convicted of murdering a young female driver he stopped along the side of the road, named Cara Knott.
That's the only one I know.
"Can you name a single police officer who's been jailed for brutality, murder or even spousal abuse?"
Yes. In my current home town of San Diego, a few years back a California Highway Patrol Officer named Craig Peyer was accused, charged, tried, and convicted of murdering a young female drive her stopped along the side of the road, named Cara Knott.
That's the only one I know.
The NYSP does a good job policing their own. This is not the only incident where the NYSP arrested their own.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_State_Police_Troop_C_scandal
"most of these guys are ex-military"
it was a female cop.... not sure if she was ex-military, and believe me, someone who was former military, isn't going to drive off with a weapon on the trunk of their car....
as for the article:
"Police officials now say they are "very embarrassed" over the incident, adding that they are not sure if the gun was loaded, which means it probably was."
it's NOT a gun, it is a rifle, get your shit straight...
" someone who was former military, isn't going to drive off with a weapon on the trunk of their car...."
Absolutely right. That entire remark or remarks about whether the cops were "baiting" by leaving the rifle there is bullshit too. Because if that were the case, they sure as hell wouldn't have driven away and left the bait there.
re gun versus rifle versus weapon: good catch. The distinction is lost on most people and I am so used to seeing that misuse that I'm becoming a little numb to it.
Now let's see if that asshat who claims to be a cop jumps in again...
Not only are you condescending your wrong, a rifle IS a gun but a gun isn't necessarily a rifle... Get your shit straight... Where'd you hear that shit any ways basic or an army movie? http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/gun
Ill try n' break it down into levels for you. Unless your in the military or something and use the term gun in reference to Artillery or Machine guns, like say... myself.
Transportation = Weapon
Car = Gun
Honda = Rifle
Honda Civic = AR15
Honda Civic Sedan= Bushmaster AR15
Honda Civic Sedan DX = Bushmaster AR15 M16A2
But if you want to get more technical I'd be willing to bet its a carbine in any case. Cant prove it though photos to blurry.
The first thing I would ask is if the picture was staged or real. We all take what we see as the truth. Wish all the stuff they have now, including the internet there is as much fake stuff as real. Other than that it would depend on what was happening when they parked. In an emergency situation parking 12" from the curb is nothing. It is a much different story with leaving the gun out. That would take a lot of explaining. Hope if this is real that the officer/s got sent home without pay. No matter what the circumstances were. One of them should have been paying attention. If in fact someone would have picked up the gun many people could have been hurt or killed. As far as police officers not being convicted of murder, wife abuse, rape. Excuse me of course they have. Where I live the police chief of the town was convicted of rape of several woman. I personnally know a police officer who abuses his wife. They are people and there is a lot of stess in their lives.
Read the article, Karen. The photographer described the whole scene, including the two police driving off with the weapon still on the trunk. And the police commanders have acknowledged that it happened.
Staged? Ask youself where someone would have obtained this firearm, and how we would have managed, without being noticed, placed it on the car's trunk, stepped back far enough to have taken the photo, and subsequently removed it and left?
Being "people" and having a lot of stress in your life is no excuse for rape or domestic violence. Would you be so quick to accept this excuse if you were married to someone who was beating YOU?
The first thing I would ask is if the picture was staged or real. We all take what we see as the truth. Wish all the stuff they have now, including the internet there is as much fake stuff as real. Other than that it would depend on what was happening when they parked. In an emergency situation parking 12" from the curb is nothing. It is a much different story with leaving the gun out. That would take a lot of explaining. Hope if this is real that the officer/s got sent home without pay. No matter what the circumstances were. One of them should have been paying attention. If in fact someone would have picked up the gun many people could have been hurt or killed. As far as police officers not being convicted of murder, wife abuse, rape. Excuse me of course they have. Where I live the police chief of the town was convicted of rape of several woman. I personnally know a police officer who abuses his wife. They are people and there is a lot of stess in their lives.
Wow! I can't believe that they forgot that they had the rifle on their trunk. I would love to know what they were doing with it out to begin with. This story is unbelievable. So much so, I'm tempted to call it a fake.
...except that the police chief acknowledged the mistake.
In my city of Rochester that will get you two tickets: one for the 12" violation and another for leaving a loaded weapon out for others to grab. Oh wait, cops don't get tickets do they....
AND YET, most police departments think their officers are more qualified to own and carry firearms than private citizens.
If the person who observed this had picked up the AR instead of photographing it, that could have been interpreted as an "illegal transfer" under the federal law. So I wonder if BATF ought to have a look into this incident to see if the Seattle LEOs violated some federal law.
A lot of these cops are ex-military. Perhaps it was 'baiting' so they could shoot the person as soon as they touched it. On a serious note, why did they have a loaded weapon like that out in the first place? Aren't they supposed to be unloaded when not in use?
Well, you can have a magazine in a rifle or handgun without having any ammunition in it.
And, an AR-15 isn't that... powerful, I mean, it barely meets the requirements for a deer hunting rifle in my home state. :-)
All that said, wow, freaking, wow. That officer has some explaining to do.
Besides, even if it had been left without a magzaine the magazine and ammo are cheap and readily available for anyone who wants to take the rifle and not regulated by federal law, states and different locales might be different, but the gun is the big restricted and expensive part of the equation.
What's your point with the "isn't that...powerful" remark? It does not matter whether it was a .25 ACP or a .460 Weatherby Magnum. Negligence is negligence.
Please let's not lose sight of the real issue, which is their inattention to the most basic safety principles, and their being so loosey-goosey that they drove off with the AR still sitting on the trunk.
Is not powerful? Ah ok, then no reason to worry about.
Is not powerful? Ah ok then, no reason to worry about it.
"What's your point with the "isn't that...powerful" remark?"
Tongue firmly planted in cheek humor, which I tried to point out with the the smilie at the end of the sentence, followed by a paragraph saying that even the best case scenario (the rifle being unloaded) is pretty horrible.
My misunderstanding.
BTW, isn't the 5.56 considered a "high power" round under the rifle competition rules of the NRA? Not that the average newspaper reporter would know or appreciate that factoid.
Hey, at least while the rifle was on the trunk of their car, they couldn't shoot anybody with it. Given how murderous and unaccountable cops are, we've got to be grateful for small favors!
What I need is a camera that looks like a rifle and a tripod that looks like a car. Then I can take pictures hassle-free... I suppose.
Newsflash: Police officer found to be human and makes a mistake.
Film at eleven.
"Not only does this Seattle police car appear to be parked more than 12 inches from the curb, its officers carelessly left this AR-15 rifle sitting on the trunk of the car while they ate donuts or drank gourmet coffee or whatever it is Seattle cops do when they are not abusing citizens."
Didn't some accuse Bart in a previous posting about not being neutral? Hmmm I will be waiting for that same person to comment here about Carlo's less than neutral attitude.
Oh, you poor picked-on thing.
Granted, the remark about the bad parking was gratuitous, but how can you possibly excuse a "mistake" as serious as leaving a weapon, any weapon, unattended?
At the club and public ranges where I shoot, the safety rules are very clear. In at least one of these places, if you left a weapon unattended on the firing line, even with the action open, under any circumstances, you'd be ejected and banned from the place.
At the very least, I expect police to be held to the same firearms safety standards as everyone else. It would be sweet if you guys also had to obey the traffic laws when you weren't going Code 3, but that's just a pipe dream.
Quit your whining. Or are you one of the doofuses who were responsible for this gaffe?
It's called sarcasm, Johnny. These stories bring it out in me.
"Johnny Law" said in part..
"Newsflash: Police officer found to be human and makes a mistake."
Yeah.. they make mistakes all the time and in a number of cases it ends up with innocent people being murdered by the cops who get away with it.
As far as "Film at eleven".. GET REAL!! You know as well as I do (along with the rest of the posters here), the camera and all the evidence would just get mysteriously LOST!!
Just look at what happened to the camera in the article "The Orlando Copwatch founder" below this one.
Every time you post "Johnny (Cops Can Do NO Wrong) Law", you show us just how ANTI-public you really are.
Rail Car Fan
Johnny, the police in this country have a horrible "image" problem, but they are in denial about it.
Only individual LEOs, acting in large numbers, will be able to counter the perception that it's "us against them," and that police are held to different standards than the rest of us.
In short, you guys put yourself in this fix, and it's up to you to bail yourselves out. Simply demanding respect or whimpering about how nobody understands you will not cut it.
Oh there will always be people who hate the police. A quick look at some of the comments on this site will show that people will criticize the police about everything.
I don't lose much sleep about it tbh but I do like to come here and try to correct some of the obvious ignorance that you folks have about police and the real world.
Bottom line is that there are some people who resent authority figures and hate that there are police out there to inconvenience them sometimes.
You have just demonstrated very nicely what I said about being in denial.
How is it that we went from police being thought of as "officer friendly" a generation or two ago to cops being considered not trustworthy by so many people?
For me, it just evolved over a few decades due to the instances of being fucked-over in numerous ways by mean and/or incompetent cops.
There are cops in this town who have saved my ass, even gone to bat for me in court when they had made a mistake. But as important as those instances are, they dwarf the number of times I have found myself needlessly endangered, not to mention threatened with arrest for simply asking a question. Or had someone come nose-to-nose with me screaming at me to "calm down."
Many of my shooting buddies are retired cops, and THEY think the character of today's police people is not what it should be.
You SHOULD lose sleep over it, because there could come a time when you are down and bleeding, and when the only chance of your getting help would be thru the intervention of a passer-by. It would be tragic if someone just left you there to die because of their general perception of cops as jerks.
Sixty years ago GM's President, Charlie Wilson uttered the words "Perception is reality." It's more true now than ever.
You may come here intending to correct ignorance, but you do yourself and other police more harm than good.
I think you are looking at the past with some rosy glasses. Take a look at how things have changed. Before police were able to shoot anyone who ran. They could beat people who fought or ran without consequences. The old phrase "beat and release" was common. They could interrogate prisoners without lawyers and with miranda.
Now take a look at the scrutiny that police are under today. I have a policy book as big as the NYC phone book with all the restrictions on us. We have internal affairs and a civilian oversight board. Any video of wrongdoing is plastered on youtube. Cops get regular drug testing and there are now statewide licensing boards that dictate training and standards.
Stop crying about how great it was yesteryear. The police are more professional and controlled now than ever. The proliferation of video and the internet just make these isolated incidents more widely known so it makes it seem like misconduct is on the rise.
Neither I nor any of my contemporaries (some of the retired coppers) can reacall an incident of a cop shooting someone who was running away, back in the day.
What they did do--at least here in Baltimore--was throw that wooden night stick ("espantoon" as they are called in this town) towards the runner's legs to bring him down. But that all went by the wayside when the commanders decided that the espantoon was too threatening to the public, especially when being twirled by someone walking a beat. So it has largely been replace by the ASP baton, which does not have that utilitarian function, and can be far more deadly if misused. (I love the way the ASP training advises you never to hit someone with the baton in certain ways...)
Stan, I agree with you when you say "I have found myself needlessly endangered". I found my self in a situation where both my son and my self were endangered. My husband was driving a little too fast and got pulled over with the 3 of us in the car. He's got a CHL and had a gun on his hip at the time when we got pulled over. He told the cop about it immediately and was asked to step out of the car so he can safely and slowly remove it from his him to hand to the cop so the cop can unload it. While attempting to unload it, he ended up cocking it and pointing it TOWARDS the car and inadvertently, the back of my son's head (who was sitting in a car seat in the middle of the backseat) and my head. IF the gun ended up going off, he would have been lucky to not have either murdered or injured either of us. My husband was pissed at the officer for not paying more attention to where the loaded gun was pointing.
My husband still has the gun, CHL, and, now, a ticket for speeding at night. He was doing 75 in a 70/65 speed zone (70 day/65 night). The gun was a tokarev pistol in 7.62 x 25. To unload it you have to cock it all the way back from the 1/4 cock (the only TRUE safety for that gun), release the mag, rack it (there was one in the chamber) and then decock it. My husband had to show the officer how to do it.
And after talking to his ex-cop friend (he left cause of a back injury he sustained on the job) that cop was being a dickhead. We were out of town when he got the ticket, it was after 1 in the morning (we didn't stop cause we were almost to my parents house anyway), he was very polite and straight forward with the officer, and he was only doing 10 over the posted night time speed limit. which they are already planning on getting rid of and making the speed limit all across the state roughly the same, for the freeway's that is. His ex-cop friend said, even without knowing him, he wouldn't have ticketed him mostly cause the speed wasn't all that outrageous and the fact that we were within a half-hours drive to our final location. My husbands lack in paying attention to his speed stemmed from 3 things: talking to me, being excited to see my parents again, and being tried cause he worked prior to our leaving. I didn't drive only cause he insisted on driving and that he wasn't too tired.
I've never, personally, had a bad encounter with a cop before then, and it's only bad because of his gross negligence with the gun. I've heard of bad cops and all (who hasn't?), but never had the misfortune to meet one.
Mom, this is a prime example of how police have changed. When I was a kid, the cops were all "gun guys." If you wanted to learn something about firearms, you'd ask a cop. If you were to do that today, you would instantly come under suspicion.
We had a youth rifle program that had been set up and managed by one of the town police forces. The guys even commandeered a building and built the range themselves.
More recently there was this situation, the next county over in the Baltimore metro area: A guy walks into a public (commercial) range to rent a gun and buy some range time. He seems OK to the RO (and this range is pretty tightly managed), so they rent him a Ruger Mark II and sell him 50 rounds of ammo. Now, if you don't know guns, you wouldn't know this: Ruger's Mark II shoots the .22 Long Rifle rimfire cartrige, and it is arguably the most popular target pistol in the country. (This comes into play in a moment.)
The customer goes out to the firing line, and essentially just burns 48 rounds, firing downrange at a target that he barely even hit. Round #49, he puts into his brain, in a successful suicide attempt, which apparently was the reason for visiting the place. Someone notices him slumped on the floor bleeding and calls 911. The local constabulary arrives in force. Meanwhile the range officer notices that the slide on the Mark II is not locked back, indicating that there is at least one round in the chamber. Among the dozen or so uniformed cops and detectives who have converged, not a damn one of them can figure out how to clear the pistol. To reiterate, this is probably the most common target pistol around, and is not all that difficult to understand just at first sight.
So it does not surprise me that a cop working traffic patrol would not know how to clear a Tokarev. Most likely, he'd never even heard of the brand.
The police commanders (especially this pantywaist who is currently commissioner in Baltimore) are themselves so afraid of firearms that they do not encourage their guys to work on proficiency on their own time, even though what you will find in the average police cruiser is far more powerful and sophisticated than it was a few decades ago.
Mom, this is a prime example of how police have changed. When I was a kid, the cops were all "gun guys." If you wanted to learn something about firearms, you'd ask a cop. If you were to do that today, you would instantly come under suspicion.
We had a youth rifle program that had been set up and managed by one of the town police forces. The guys even commandeered a building and built the range themselves.
More recently there was this situation, the next county over in the Baltimore metro area: A guy walks into a public (commercial) range to rent a gun and buy some range time. He seems OK to the RO (and this range is pretty tightly managed), so they rent him a Ruger Mark II and sell him 50 rounds of ammo. Now, if you don't know guns, you wouldn't know this: Ruger's Mark II shoots the .22 Long Rifle rimfire cartrige, and it is arguably the most popular target pistol in the country. (This comes into play in a moment.)
The customer goes out to the firing line, and essentially just burns 48 rounds, firing downrange at a target that he barely even hit. Round #49, he puts into his brain, in a successful suicide attempt, which apparently was the reason for visiting the place. Someone notices him slumped on the floor bleeding and calls 911. The local constabulary arrives in force. Meanwhile the range officer notices that the slide on the Mark II is not locked back, indicating that there is at least one round in the chamber. Among the dozen or so uniformed cops and detectives who have converged, not a damn one of them can figure out how to clear the pistol. To reiterate, this is probably the most common target pistol around, and is not all that difficult to understand just at first sight.
So it does not surprise me that a cop working traffic patrol would not know how to clear a Tokarev. Most likely, he'd never even heard of the brand.
The police commanders (especially this pantywaist who is currently commissioner in Baltimore) are themselves so afraid of firearms that they do not encourage their guys to work on proficiency on their own time, even though what you will find in the average police cruiser is far more powerful and sophisticated than it was a few decades ago.
Double post. The server is slow and I am too impatient today.
Whoops. Triple post. Sorry.
"Newsflash: Police officer found to be human and makes a mistake."
Newsflash: when people make mistakes (like pissing in an ally and cussing a cop, f'rex), police call them "criminals" and they are arrested. Remember telling that story, Johnny?
Perhaps Seattle PD has been recently trained by the BATF.
The SPD has been fucking up so bad and so often around here lately that this is pretty much a non-story. If the "officer" that murdered a man that his back turned and the gang detective that stomped on a detainees head and threatened to beat the mexican piss out of him, go home without even being charged... ever... then I doubt the officer involved in this case even gets a stern talking to.
Stupid ass Seattle citizens just go right along with it all too... no protests.. no calls for the chief's job.. then the chief suspends two cops for threatening to "skull fuck" a man during a traffic stop and people are all up in arms about how officer's aren't being allowed to do their jobs. It's a mess here.. really. Johnny Law would love the pro-cop sentiment in this area.
Johnny, if I made that same mistake, I'd be facing something like 5 years in prison for violating several Maryland laws regarding the safe transport and storage of firearms.
1. Oh yeah, I always keep unloaded mags stuck in my semi-automatic rifles/pistols.
2. I doubt the cops have AR-15's---count on them having full auto M-4's/M-16's. Plus my eyes are not good enough to verify the make/model of the rifle...though the barrel looks too long and their is a rather extensive looking scope mounted which would be unusual for a .223 caliber rifle.
Other than SWAT, most officers that carry long guns carry AR-15s on duty.
Post new comment