Mich. Sup. Ct. Rules Police Have No Expection of Privacy on Duty
You would think the matter would have been settled in the lower courts because common sense and common law tell us that police do not have an expectation of privacy while on duty.
But it took the Michigan Supreme Court to decide the case involving hip hop mogul Dr. Dre and Detroit City Councilman Gary Brown, who was a high-ranking police officer in 2000 when he was videotaped backstage during a performance that made it onto a DVD.
Brown was videotaped telling concert organizers that the power would be turned off if they showed a sexual explicit video during a performance at Joe Louis Arena.
The clip made it onto a DVD titled "Up in Smoke" highlighting the national tour that year. It was part of a series of behind-the-scenes clips.
Brown claimed his privacy had been violated. The Supreme Court ruled against him, overturning an appeals court ruling.
The decision is especially significant as police in several states have increasingly been using felony wiretapping charges to arrest citizens who videotape them while they are on duty.
Fujifilm's X-Pro1, now M Mount friendly
Olympus' Micro Four Thirds 75mm prime
Can you fix the focus on a blurry photo after the fact?
The birth of Mirrorless Cameras
The Joy Of Winning A Photo Contest
Choosing your first dSLR camera
New York City can be beautiful!
Choosing the Right Light Stand
Photojojo iPhone Telephoto Lens review — AudioCast
My week with Q
How To Become A Successful Photographer
"When the Wind Stopped" — poem with 4 photos
Creating The New Family Portrait
Tips for Textures
Cast aways - saving those photographic memories
One Man Show: My 25 Years With Digital Photography
Studio, Flash, & Available Light — Three Books Reviewed
Portrait styling: dangerous pairings
Adobe Photoshop CS6 Product Managers Interview Audiocast
A gift of flowers: unfold your senses
On Set of "Love & Robots" the Film
No-Brainer Setup For A Digital Photo Frame Exhibit - Part 3











Planning “National Geographic” style photo travel
Wilderness Travel 1 Rainforests – Essential Gear
Backlighting Basics
What Moves You?
FIGURES IN MOTION: Decades of Evolving Personal Imagery in Photography, Part 7
Lomography Store, Austin, Texas — GALLERY
GALLERY — Up to $1,000 Reward for Cattle Rustlers
25% off on photography eBooks
eyePhone: The eBook for iPhone Photographers
Interview with Harold Davis — Closeup Maestro of Flowers & Water Drops
Interview with Steve Caplin — Photoshop Digital Artist, Commercial Illustrator, & Author
A Brief History Of Light & Photography: Part 3 of 3
A Brief History Of Light & Photography: Part 2 Of 3
Easy technique to select, edit and sequence keywords for web
How much should you charge for a photograph?



























Comments
From the linked article, the guy who sued Dre seemed to believe that he created an expectation of privacy by telling the photographer not to take his picture. When the photographer kept recording, the guy believes his privacy was violated.
He believes, even after losing in court, that his rights were violated when he was recorded after telling the photographer not to.
He can believe that the suns shines out his arse but that does not make so.
Related.... is direct email the way to submit leads?
http://www.ctpost.com/news/article/Conn-bill-allows-lawsuits-over-videot...
Post new comment