Milwaukee Police Chief Proves Not So Charming In Blaming Journalist For Unlawful Arrest

 

You would think Milwaukee Police Chief Ed Flynn would have a soft spot for journalists. After all, he had a steamy love affair with a journalist more than 20 years his junior a couple of years ago.

Both were married and it created a little controversy in their community, especially because both violated ethical standards within their respective professions.

But Flynn proved to have no respect for the First Amendment rights of Fox6 news videographer Clint Fillinger, who was arrested Sunday while trying to cover a house fire.

Although the video clearly shows Fillinger had every right to continue videotaping when he was ordered away from the area and arrested, Flynn said he should have simply followed the sergeant’s orders – as unlawful as they were.

So now Fox6, the National Press Photographers Association, the Radio Television Digital News Association and the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press are pretty pissed off at him.

All four organizations have sent him letters and the NPPA sent him a follow-up letter in response to his moronic comments.

Although I have yet to receive a response to my letter dated 9/20/11 I have had an opportunity to listen to the comments you made to the Milwaukee media yesterday. I find it quite disturbing to hear you say that “if the cameraman had simply complied with the instructions, had simply complied with the instructions to back off from a working fire none of this hullabaloo would be taking place.” As is clearly evident from Mr. Fillinger’s video he was complying with the sergeant’s unlawful order when he was forcefully pushed to the ground and arrested. In case you did not have an opportunity to read the decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit that I sent, it is well established that the “fundamental and virtually self-evident nature of the First Amendment’s protections” guarantees the “right to film government officials or matters of public interest in public space.” 

Perhaps Flynn is a little jaded about the media’s right-to-know after his fling with Jessica McBride, which became the talk of the town in 2009.

According to her 5,000-word article where she gushed about him endlessly, she states that he has a history of charming the media and others with whom he comes in contact, especially when he was being considered for the job.

She described it as Flynn's "charm offensive."

He stood out at the finalist interviews of the Fire and Police Commission, wowing its members with his intellect, national connections and communication skills. “Ed Flynn has the ability to talk a dog off a meat wagon,” says Mike Tobin, the Fire and Police Commission’s executive director and a former Milwaukee cop.

Flynn is also a compelling physical presence: tall, iron-haired, fit (he once rode a bicycle 233 miles) and energetic. He has what one observer calls “command bearing.”

***

The mayor was charmed. The vote by Barrett’s Fire and Police Commission appointees was unanimous. And within a few months of taking the job, Flynn had won over even aldermen who opposed his appointment, like Bob Donovan and Bob Bauman. “He’s very polished, very articulate, very sharp,” Bauman marvels. “I’m very high on him,” Donovan gushes.

Almost everyone seems to be. The police union. The head of the local NAACP. Community activists. Conservative talk show hosts. Groups that normally agree on nothing have all embraced the new chief.

***

Flynn can be blunt, yet charming; winningly persuasive, yet difficult to get to know. In Braintree, “he was aloof,” says Polio. “A hard-to-read person,” says Virginia White, a community activist in Springfield. His daughter notes that Flynn “keeps going into situations as an outsider, so that makes him hesitant sometimes to open up.”

Yet he always seems to charm the media. “There’s a puff piece everywhere he went,” Polio sniffs.

But it doesn’t appear as if he is going to charm his way out of this blunder.

edflynn280.jpg

Comments

His last comment is the most telling ... He doesn't want to get contradicted by facts.

Told you this guy is a tool.

repost:

13 hours ago

"I understand it's not an easy job but they picked it."

Not in Milwaukee. In Milwaukee the cops don't even show up when you call.

Milwaukee Chief Flynn says:

"Since the average resident of this city is willing to wait four hours for the cable guy and half a day for a furniture delivery, it seems to me a reasonable delay in responding for a call is an acceptable balance," Flynn said in an interview with the Journal Sentinel.

http://www.jsonline.com/watchdog/watchdogreports/127077973.html

You couldn't make this up if you tried. They do not respond to calls. No response. No crime. So the number of crimes goes down.

Chief denies mob attack on the 4th of July.

http://www.jsonline.com/watchdog/watchdogreports/127077973.html

And if they do show up the cops do not make reports.

"Most of the 11 people who told the Journal Sentinel they were attacked or witnessed the attacks on their friends said that police did not take their complaints seriously. They each said police responded to the scene quickly and tended to the injured, but officers did not take statements from them and told them to leave the area.

"You've got 20-plus people giving eyewitness accounts. I'm very surprised that they said it wasn't a mob," said Mowrer.

Lange said he told an officer about the beatings but noticed the officer didn't write anything down or note his name. Bublitz tried to tell an officer that her three-speed bicycle had been stolen and that one of her friends was hurt but said the officer told her he was looking for evidence.

"About 20 of us stayed to give statements and make sure everyone was accounted for. The police wouldn't listen to us, they wouldn't take our names or statements. They told us to leave. It was completely infuriating," Bublitz said."

http://www.jsonline.com/news/milwaukee/125027704.html

Flynn is the guy who got caught banging a journalist who does seminars on ethics in journalism. They were both married at the time. He refers to the Milwaukee police as "His Troops".

This will play out. Will he manage to sweep it under the rug? Probably not but he's hopping that people will forget about it or that something more important will take the focus off of it.

If I was the person doing the pushing I'd all ready be charged and in jail or out on bail. But if a police officer is the one doing the pushing we have to interview everyone. Get both sides of the story, not get contradicted by facts.

What happened in the video is really clear. Police officer gives an illegal order. Cameraman complains as he's complying. Officer walks into cameraman's hand as a 'pretext' of an assault on the officer. Officer than assaults cameraman and arrests him.

Sort of like how they set up the 'resisting arrest' by shouting "stop resisting" over and over as a pretext that the person was actually resisting arrest. That way any witnesses will say the officers where shouting at the person to stop resisting even though he is not and they are beating him up.

Cops are trained to do these things. We need to change the training.

In the end the cameraman is going to get alot of money before this is over. He deserves it.

Problem is, the money will come from the taxpayers and not from the sale of the cops' assets. There is also the question of why the cop isn't facing federal charges. His act constitutes kidnapping under color of authority. By the wording of 18 USC 242 that's potentially a death penalty charge.

Post new comment

Pixiq on Facebook

Join the 10162 Pixiq fans on Facebook

Share

  • Share

Subscribe

Get weekly updates from Pixiq. Short, sweet, and always interesting.