Nature and Political (in)Correctness
some thoughts on our risk-averse times
It helps to be a tolerant kind of guy, non-judgemental about human frailties when you have a bag full of your own…people in glass houses, they say, should not throw stones.
Trouble is there are too many folk who love to set themselves up to tell you what to do. It’s probably through huge personal insecurity on their part …so then WE have to feel sorry for THEM being a pain in OUR rear ends. AAGGH. They can run your life so much better than you – having made such a patent success of their own…not.

A day or so ago, as I lay on the ground deep in a birchwood, I pondered this modern tendency towards cloying care from those who would be both their brothers’ and sisters’ keepers. I thought back to those dim and distant days of my childhood books of fairy stories where tiny elfin folk were always sitting on or under a mushroom (hey, they knew all about hallucinogenics…). Usually, those fungi were bright red with white spots… the Fly Agaric (Amanita muscaria) containing the psychoactive substance muscimol. In Siberia, they once used it as an intoxicant and hallucinogen in religious ceremonies…so, OK for fairies, not really one for the kids... It is highly poisonous but rarely fatal, which is more than you can say for some of its relatives in the genus Amanita such as Death Cap (Amanita phalloides). Posters on the walls of our schoolrooms pointed out the dangers...

Moving forwards through the decades: just a few weeks ago on internet radio I heard some earnest ‘do-gooder’ say how a certain plant species should be eradicated because a woman had picked the berries, thinking they were blueberries, made a pie and poisoned her family. The berries look nothing like blueberries: they are black, shiny and are the fruit of Deadly Nightshade (Atropa belladonna), source of Atropine, a plant alkaloid without which most eye surgery would be impossible.
Deadly Nightshade was, at one stage (and might still for all I know) an essential ingredient along with “tail of newt, eye of frog, juice of snail and tongue of dog" (and don't go easy on the mandrake fries) in a witches take-away. What got me was the humourless insistence of this man (given his moment of fame) on the need to eradicate the plant on the basis of one incident, largely due to the ignorance of the picker.
Unkind people might say the genes of someone so "intellectually challenged" are best not passed on and that this was Darwinian selection at its best…But we live in a no-blame world where even the chronically obese can bleat (or belch) that it's not their fault, no one told them that 50lb of donuts per day and two gallons of Pepsi might make them a touch heavier than good health might dictate. So sue, sue sue…Hell, I know I carry a few too many pounds but it's because I love cooking good food, eating it and washing it down with a glass or three of wine: this is Italy! Whose fault ? Mine, all mine.

We go out around once week close to home where we live in Italy looking for new places to go walking and taking ‘bread and butter’ photos – we find an amazing number of ancient sites (Etruscan and Roman) that are never visited, far away from roads and where nature has taken over. Italy has too much and cannot cope with what, anywhere else, would be prized. You can clamber up cliff paths, look over sheer drops and there are no notices saying it is dangerous: clearly it is …and you should know, stupid.
Now, if there is one thing that is guaranteed to make me deliberately politically 'obtuse' it is a certain kind of person who loves to tut and shake their head... Italians (bless’em) take a much more relaxed approach: live, let live and park anywhere you want. I am not extolling that latter aspect but that ‘flexible approach’ tends to make for better, smoother interaction with one’s fellow human and engenders a lot less aggression.
On second thoughts, I realize I may have 'maligned' those who promote excessive control…after all, they are selflessly doing it for us. We poor, inferior mortals need their guidance…and maybe lawyers would go poor and hungry if we took responsibility for our own actions: a terrible, terrible thought.
So, I’d like to dedicate an image to those folk (wheresover they may be and whomsoever they are) generously imposing their narrowness on the rest of us… strictly on the basis that one picture is worth a thousand words.

Fujifilm's X-Pro1, now M Mount friendly
Olympus' Micro Four Thirds 75mm prime
Can you fix the focus on a blurry photo after the fact?
The birth of Mirrorless Cameras
The Joy Of Winning A Photo Contest
Choosing your first dSLR camera
New York City can be beautiful!
Choosing the Right Light Stand
Photojojo iPhone Telephoto Lens review — AudioCast
My week with Q
How To Become A Successful Photographer
"When the Wind Stopped" — poem with 4 photos
Creating The New Family Portrait
Tips for Textures
Cast aways - saving those photographic memories
One Man Show: My 25 Years With Digital Photography
Studio, Flash, & Available Light — Three Books Reviewed
Portrait styling: dangerous pairings
Adobe Photoshop CS6 Product Managers Interview Audiocast
A gift of flowers: unfold your senses
On Set of "Love & Robots" the Film
No-Brainer Setup For A Digital Photo Frame Exhibit - Part 3











Planning “National Geographic” style photo travel
Wilderness Travel 1 Rainforests – Essential Gear
Backlighting Basics
What Moves You?
FIGURES IN MOTION: Decades of Evolving Personal Imagery in Photography, Part 7
Lomography Store, Austin, Texas — GALLERY
GALLERY — Up to $1,000 Reward for Cattle Rustlers
25% off on photography eBooks
eyePhone: The eBook for iPhone Photographers
Interview with Harold Davis — Closeup Maestro of Flowers & Water Drops
Interview with Steve Caplin — Photoshop Digital Artist, Commercial Illustrator, & Author
A Brief History Of Light & Photography: Part 3 of 3
A Brief History Of Light & Photography: Part 2 Of 3
Easy technique to select, edit and sequence keywords for web
How much should you charge for a photograph?









































Comments
Hi Paul, an amusing little piece. Especially when I came across your last photo. More so when I misread your bio as 'macho photography' instead of 'macro photography'. I guess you had to be there.
Being in the safety business I was intrigued with your blog relating to risk. Can't say I will ever subscribe to eradication of a species, or aim to control other people's lives, but I will argue for your opportunity to take managed risks. How little we would have or know if we failed to take risks. Especially Youtube.
Anyhoo, enough babbling then. Hope you name that last fungi Roger.
Hi Grant, Many thanks for your comment.
Hm 'macho' or 'macro'...when I've finished doing the ironing and made supper, I'll ask my good lady! I know it is somewhat incongruous being a big guy who photographs bugs and pretty flowers....
Wish there were more like you who took the sane approach to managed risks. It is central to human nature that there have to be some risk-takers though too high a proportion might not be a good thing in evolutionary terms. One problem is the fear of litigation so you even have signs like "may contain traces of nuts" on a pack of peanuts. Well, yessir I sincerely hope I do find those traces.
Something more insidious is what happens when people are generally well off and have no REAL life or death worries then they invent problems and worry about trivia. I have seen how children become wrapped in a cotton wool of restrictions because 'out there' are predators...every other person they pass. It is important to get things in perspective. Time and again I have seen UK/US newspapers stoke fires of fear as a policy.
Of course, if a populace is scared then it is easier to impose restrictions and Draconian laws and thus control...but people tend not to think of that (or much else) until it is too late and the most fundamental freedoms have been eroded.
Yes, Roger is a good name for a pet fungus of this 'eager' sort...and if one should find a second and third then nickname forms of Richard or William might also be appropriate..one could go on, best not.
regards
Paul
A good read - I've been railing against 'PC' tonight myself, must be something in the mushrooms.
I think there must be legions of us who find the excesses of PC too much to bear...somehow we have just sat back and let these humorless humanoids slither their way into control. Still, if nothing else they do provide cohesion by acting as convenient hate figures!
And as to these mushrooms...there is definitely something compelling in them, enough to make me return to the wood and take another few hundred shots...struggling to get the definitive one.
We did find plenty of edible ones too (my Italians pals are experts)...i just fried those in a little very new olive oil, added parsley and a glass of white wine...someone has to suffer!
Paul
Post new comment