New Haven Police Continue Their Crackdown Against Videographers

A recent case in New Haven, Ct. involving a student arrested for videotaping cops shows just how broken the legal system is.
Luis Luna was arrested September 25 for videotaping a group of cops breaking up a fight. He was charged with interfering with police and spent the night in jail.
Police even stated in their report that he was arrested - under orders of New Haven Assistant Police Chief Ariel Melendez - for refusing to stop filming after he was ordered to do so, which is hardly interfering.
They continued to violate his rights when they deleted two videos from his iPhone, inadvertently photographing their feet as they fiddled with his camera as you can see in the above photo.
They did all this even though New Haven Police Chief Frank Limon has publicly stated that citizens have every right to videotape police. This, of course, in response to a couple of questionable incidents where citizens were threatened or arrested for videotaping cops.
According to the New Haven Independent, the chief's exact words were:
“It’s not our policy to arrest people for filming,” Chief Limon said in a conversation Wednesday. “As a general principal, it is not illegal to video.
So given these circumstances, you would think that charges against Luna would automatically be thrown out and, wishful thinking here, the assistant police chief disciplined for ordering an unlawful arrest.
Instead, Luna was told they would drop the charge of interference of a police officer if only he would plead guilty to creating a disturbance.
These are the type of plea deals that are forced upon innocent people every single day in courthouses across the country.
They made me a similar offer after my first arrest, which I refused to accept. That decision prompted my first lawyer to drop me as a client. I was lucky I found another lawyer who wasn't afraid to take it to trial.
By that point, I already knew I was in for a long, drawn-out fight, but most people don't have the time, energy or resources to dedicate themselves to such a fight.
Luna ended up agreeing to plea guilty to creating a disturbance, even though he knew he did nothing illegal, the police chief knew he did nothing illegal and the judge knew he did nothing illegal.
But they still needed to teach him a lesson because Luna was, in fact, guilty of contempt-of-cop.
And that is a punishable offense unless you are prepared for a long, drawn-out fight.
Fujifilm's X-Pro1, now M Mount friendly
Olympus' Micro Four Thirds 75mm prime
Can you fix the focus on a blurry photo after the fact?
The birth of Mirrorless Cameras
The Joy Of Winning A Photo Contest
Choosing your first dSLR camera
New York City can be beautiful!
Choosing the Right Light Stand
Photojojo iPhone Telephoto Lens review — AudioCast
My week with Q
How To Become A Successful Photographer
"When the Wind Stopped" — poem with 4 photos
Creating The New Family Portrait
Tips for Textures
Cast aways - saving those photographic memories
One Man Show: My 25 Years With Digital Photography
Studio, Flash, & Available Light — Three Books Reviewed
Portrait styling: dangerous pairings
Adobe Photoshop CS6 Product Managers Interview Audiocast
A gift of flowers: unfold your senses
On Set of "Love & Robots" the Film
No-Brainer Setup For A Digital Photo Frame Exhibit - Part 3











Planning “National Geographic” style photo travel
Wilderness Travel 1 Rainforests – Essential Gear
Backlighting Basics
What Moves You?
FIGURES IN MOTION: Decades of Evolving Personal Imagery in Photography, Part 7
Lomography Store, Austin, Texas — GALLERY
GALLERY — Up to $1,000 Reward for Cattle Rustlers
25% off on photography eBooks
eyePhone: The eBook for iPhone Photographers
Interview with Harold Davis — Closeup Maestro of Flowers & Water Drops
Interview with Steve Caplin — Photoshop Digital Artist, Commercial Illustrator, & Author
A Brief History Of Light & Photography: Part 3 of 3
A Brief History Of Light & Photography: Part 2 Of 3
Easy technique to select, edit and sequence keywords for web
How much should you charge for a photograph?




























Comments
That's actually a neat picture.
"That decision prompted my first lawyer to drop me as a client."
Friggin classic. The attorney has a duty to fight
for you zealously but "drops" you when things
get a little hot. People don't realize how "in bed"
lawyers are with the bully court system.
"But they still needed to teach him a lesson because Luna was, in fact, guilty of contempt-of-cop.
And that is a punishable offense unless you are prepared for a long, drawn-out fight.
I think you got that wrong ... even with a long, drawn-out fight, isn't that still punishment enough for something that isn't illegal??
They had to get him to plead to *something*, otherwise they have to basically admit it was a false arrest in the first place. And they can't have that liability.
Officers destroying evidence... that they can just ignore of course.
The entire Bar in America is the enemy of the people. The "civil rights" organizations are a fraud too.
Attorneys in this country go to law school for the sole purpose of enriching themselves. They are by definition privileged characters and want nothing to do with "trouble makers" actually following the Bill of Rights portion of the Constitution.
Actually, even though there are plenty of evil attorneys, there are also plenty who strive to help innocent people fight against the corruption of the state. There are lots of innocent men who would still be in prison or even dead if not for good lawyers.
Excluding DNA from the conversation, name a lawyer and case that was won in the last ten years.
It's simply unheard of for an attorney to challenge "evidence". To find such an example -even without success- you're looking at a murder case for someone wealthy who is paying a huge sum. That is accepted practice. If someone has money they can buy justice.
No "public defender" will challenge evidence. No one with a public defender ever walks out of court free through the efforts in front of a jury by the public defender.
TITLE 42 > CHAPTER 21A > SUBCHAPTER I > Part A > § 2000aa
§ 2000aa. Searches and seizures by government officers and employees in connection with investigation or prosecution of criminal offenses
Post new comment