New York attorneys become PINAC's first sponsors
Editor’s note: You might have noticed the new ad in the right sidebar, which is the first step in making Photography is Not a Crime a long-term endeavor with the freedom and support to pursue investigative stories. While the newspapers might be dying, I am only getting stronger. I’m offering three levels of sponsorship plans: Partner level, sponsor level and advertiser level. If you or your company are interested in becoming part of the cause, please send an email to carlosmiller at magiccitymedia dot com for more details.
As a prosecutor, Gerald Cohen would frequently come across police officers willing to stretch the truth to gain a conviction.
“We saw that a little too often,” said the man who spent three years working for the Bronx County District Attorney’s Office before he opened a private practice.
“We would ask them what happened and they would give us a story that was full of holes and when we pointed that out to them, they would tell us, ‘well, what do you want me to say?’.”
“I would tell them, ‘I want you to tell me the truth’.”
And if the truth was not enough to support a conviction, then he would be forced to dismiss the case.
“They would always get upset with us,” he said.
Today, he is a partner in a Manhattan law firm with Joshua Fitch, another attorney who spent three years working in the same D.A.’s office and had the same approach to the law.
As Cohen & Fitch LLC, they specialize in police misconduct cases, including photographers who end up getting arrested.
Cohen represented Duane Kerzic of Amtrak fame as well as another photographer who had been arrested by Amtrak police a year earlier.
And he is also representing Robert Taylor who was arrested in February for taking photos inside a subway station and charged with “unauthorized photography” among other things. The New York Civil Liberties Union has taken on Taylor’s criminal case pro bono and Cohen is taking on his civil suit against the New York Police Department.
“When you hear about a photographer who gets arrested for pursuing a hobby or a livelihood, it really strikes a chord because we live in a society where we should be free to express ourselves,” he said.
“And when they make you delete your photos, the implications are alarming because once the government tells you what you can and can’t photograph, they are controlling information.”
In hearing him speak, it is obvious Cohen has the same passion about the First Amendment as we do.
“Photography is one of the fundamental tools of a free society,” he said.
“In an event where there are conflicting statements, a video or picture serves as an objective truth.”
In other words, without cameras, it becomes all too easy for officers to ask prosecutors, “what do you want me to say?”
-30-
I am a multimedia journalist who has been fighting a lengthy legal battle after having photographed Miami police against their wishes in Feb. 2007. Please help the fight by donating to my Legal Defense Fund in the top left sidebar, which helps pay for the thousands of dollars I’ve acrued in debt since my arrest. To keep updated on the latest articles, join my networks at Facebook, Twitter and Friendfeed.
Can you fix the focus on a blurry photo after the fact?
The birth of Mirrorless Cameras
Choosing your first dSLR camera
New York City can be beautiful!
The Fujifilm Finepix X10, A Review
Choosing the Right Light Stand
Photojojo iPhone Telephoto Lens review — AudioCast
My week with Q
How To Become A Successful Photographer
"When the Wind Stopped" — poem with 4 photos
Tips for Textures
Butterflies in Motion
Cast aways - saving those photographic memories
One Man Show: My 25 Years With Digital Photography
Studio, Flash, & Available Light — Three Books Reviewed
Portrait styling: dangerous pairings
Adobe Photoshop CS6 Product Managers Interview Audiocast
A gift of flowers: unfold your senses
On Set of "Love & Robots" the Film
Ilford Galerie Gold Fibre Silk Inkjet Paper — Audiocast











Planning “National Geographic” style photo travel
Wilderness Travel 1 Rainforests – Essential Gear
Backlighting Basics
A Brief History Of Light & Photography: Part 3 of 3
A Brief History Of Light & Photography: Part 2 Of 3
What Moves You?
FIGURES IN MOTION: Decades of Evolving Personal Imagery in Photography, Part 7
Lomography Store, Austin, Texas — GALLERY
GALLERY — Up to $1,000 Reward for Cattle Rustlers
eyePhone: The eBook for iPhone Photographers
Taking your Portraiture Higher
Interview with Harold Davis — Closeup Maestro of Flowers & Water Drops
Interview with Steve Caplin — Photoshop Digital Artist, Commercial Illustrator, & Author
Easy technique to select, edit and sequence keywords for web
How much should you charge for a photograph?
























Comments
Finaly a BLOODSUCKER (lawyer) who isnt realy a blood sucker
BRAVO
Best news I’ve heard all year!
This is great. You bet I’m going to make a note of their number, and keep it right next to my copy of Bert Krages’ PDF.
TxRadioguy,
Don’t embarrass yourself by coming on here with your “conservative” ideology.
Many of my readers are conservative and do not believe you have to follow the order of a policeman when it violates your Constitutional rights.
You’re better off sticking with other neo-cons like yourself who cheer the Patriot Act.
Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld are Jewish?
Seriously, dude, if you want to have a legitimate debate, then bring it on.
But if you’re just going to resort to childish insults, then just stay over there on “Conservative Underground” with your Kool-Aid drinking, freedom-stomping, Constitution-trashing, government-worshiping counterparts.
This site might be a little too much for your intellect.
Carlos, congrats for the sponsor! Its good to see legal experts taking such a stance – out liberties have been dragged through the muck for the last several years, I’m afraid to say.
The only thing I’m still trying to figure out, is why some of your readers tend to only troll and throw around insults ad hominem? I was under the impression that this comment box was primarily intended to serve as a conversation box about the topic – debate, growth and so forth. Or maybe I should stop trying to apply logic as such?
Diomedesxx,
Yes, you have a point. I’m going to delete that guy’s comments.
I do stand by free speech but in this case, he is just being a dick.
If he wants to debate legitimately, he’s welcome to come back.
Ahh I see free speech for thee but not for me.
So much for your belief in the 1st Amendment.
Dude,
You’re so predictable.
Post new comment