Newark Police sued twice in one week over First Amendment issues
Carlos Miller
Using subpoena power that you think would be reserved for criminal investigations, Newark Police obtained the IP address of four police officers who posted anonymous criticisms against the department on a website that discusses local issues and politics, according to the New Jersey Star-Ledger.
Three officers ended up getting fired and a fourth officer, Louis Wohltman, ended up getting suspended for nine months for his comments, even though he was off-duty when he posted the comments, which alleged corruption and inefficiency within the department.
Now Wohltman is suing the Newark Police Department for violating his First Amendment rights and invading his privacy. And the ACLU is backing him in the federal lawsuit.
No word on whether the department’s internal affairs division is looking into the allegations of corruption. Or if they were the ones leading the investigation against the four officers.
The lawsuit comes at the heels of another lawsuit filed last week against the Newark Police Department for arresting a newspaper editor who refused to turn over photographs, which is a clear First Amendment violation.
It also comes at a time when employers throughout the country are increasingly retaliating against employees for expressing their opinions online.
Just last week in two separate incidents in Florida, two men lost lost their jobs in connection with blogs they maintain. It’s gotten to the point where many bloggers insist on remaining anonymous to post their opinions online, which at this point, is still protected under the First Amendment.
But for how long?
The Newark incident marks one of the first times, if not the first time, that an employer used the power of subpoena to track down an employee who was posting anonymous opinions online.
In a related matter, the Miami Police Department suspended officer Geovani Nunez for expressing opinion to a newspaper columnist about what he thought was an unjust arrest.
Apparently, the federal whistleblower law does not apply to police officers.
It is no wonder why so many officers have trouble respecting the First Amendments rights of the citizens they are sworn to protect.
Get all outdoorsy with Pentax's Optio WG2 and WG2-GPS
Canon's complement of compacts
How to use a grey card
We’re All Bozos On This Bus--The Red Bus to Hell
Nikon PB4 Bellows Reborn
Worlds Fastest Camera
The New Sony NEX 7
Photojojo iPhone Telephoto Lens review — AudioCast
Photo Accessories that Fail Security Checks
My week with Q
Studio equipment buying guide for beginners
VSCO Film Studio Review
Lessons in Lighting
The russellgraves.com Photo Minute - Truck Blinds
Photographing Children in the wedding party
Cattle Country
Creative Photo Valentine Surprise
How to Use Multiple Lights for Dramatic Portraits
Making your own flash diffuser
LR4 free presets: Faded series
Using Sync for Video in Develop
A gift of flowers: unfold your senses
On Set of "Love & Robots" the Film
My Night with Ilford Galerie Gold Silk Fibre
FOTOMOTO - Why I Left











Silhouettes & Photo Contests
Cyan, not just another color
Our 26 best photo projects of 2011
Family Ties That Bind
Animal Group Portraits
A Brief History Of Light & Photography: Part 3 of 3
A Brief History Of Light & Photography: Part 2 Of 3
Lightroom Interview: Kevin Tieskoetter
Always Dream Big
Gallery: Embedded with the Territorial Army
Getty Villa Malibu — 4 Old Faces, 1 Sunken Garden — GALLERY (6 photos)
Wildlife photography for the masses
The 110 page guide to post-processing
How much should you charge for a photograph?
Santa Pictures + Marketing for your Business


































Comments
Sorry, but *no* laws apply to police officers. They are above the law. They *are* the law.
Ever heard of the Rule of Law?
It means that NO ONE is above the law.
And that is (supposed to be) half the POINT of the US.
The cops are not above the law. They are to enforce the law, and therefore should be acting in a way that is beyond reproach. The courts are to interpret the law. The are not allowed to right the law. Tho they seem to be doing that.
The judiciary branch is the law maker.
Post new comment