Introducing the Nikon D5100
It feels as if it were one of the worst-kept secrets in the photography world, but the Nikon D5100 has at last been made official. It’s the shiny replacement for the D5000, with a bigger screen, smaller body, and larger sensor. It can make full HD movies, too (now there’s a shocker), has in-camera special effects capabilities, and has a super-high ISO in night vision mode.
The idea is to give the same image quality as a D7000, but in a smaller and less expensive body, whilst sitting a notch up from the D3100.
The movie capability, full HD for up to 20 minutes, on this camera is something that really seems to have made Nikon proud, from the vari-angle screen to the option to add an external microphone. (How about the ME-1, also announced today?) Of course, there’s also auto-focus, in-camera editing, and the ability to watch your videos directly on an HD screen via the HDMI port. And last but certainly least, all of this is controlled from a dedicated movie button next to the shutter release. (I can just see my mother only ever managing to make videos if she were to get her hands on one of these.)
It’s 16.2 megapixel sensor backed up by the Expeed 2 processor, just the same as the D7000. ISO ranges from 100 to 6,400, but can be pushed to 12,800, and on again to a dizzying 25,600 in Hi2 mode. Head into night vision mode and it goes higher still, but your pictures will be in black and white. (Mind you, I’m getting a headache just thinking about the noise they’d have in colour.)
There’s an 11-point auto-focusing system, what feels like a gajillion different auto scene modes, 4 frames-per-second continuous shooting, and the now-obligatory gamut of in-camera effects, which includes miniature, selective colour, and high- and low-key.
How does this strike your fancy? The D5100 is coming in at around £780 (€904) with an 18-55mm kit lens and will be available from 21 April 2011 (probably).
Nikon can, of course, tell you even more.
Fujifilm's X-Pro1, now M Mount friendly
Olympus' Micro Four Thirds 75mm prime
Can you fix the focus on a blurry photo after the fact?
The birth of Mirrorless Cameras
The Joy Of Winning A Photo Contest
Choosing your first dSLR camera
New York City can be beautiful!
Choosing the Right Light Stand
Photojojo iPhone Telephoto Lens review — AudioCast
My week with Q
How To Become A Successful Photographer
"When the Wind Stopped" — poem with 4 photos
Creating The New Family Portrait
Tips for Textures
Cast aways - saving those photographic memories
One Man Show: My 25 Years With Digital Photography
Studio, Flash, & Available Light — Three Books Reviewed
Portrait styling: dangerous pairings
Adobe Photoshop CS6 Product Managers Interview Audiocast
A gift of flowers: unfold your senses
On Set of "Love & Robots" the Film
No-Brainer Setup For A Digital Photo Frame Exhibit - Part 3











Planning “National Geographic” style photo travel
Wilderness Travel 1 Rainforests – Essential Gear
Backlighting Basics
What Moves You?
FIGURES IN MOTION: Decades of Evolving Personal Imagery in Photography, Part 7
Lomography Store, Austin, Texas — GALLERY
GALLERY — Up to $1,000 Reward for Cattle Rustlers
25% off on photography eBooks
eyePhone: The eBook for iPhone Photographers
Interview with Harold Davis — Closeup Maestro of Flowers & Water Drops
Interview with Steve Caplin — Photoshop Digital Artist, Commercial Illustrator, & Author
A Brief History Of Light & Photography: Part 3 of 3
A Brief History Of Light & Photography: Part 2 Of 3
Easy technique to select, edit and sequence keywords for web
How much should you charge for a photograph?










































Comments
nice, i wonder if the same sensor perform on Nikon D5100 body ? is it same or perhaps better than Nikon D7000.
Seems to me to be very similar to the Canon 600D but a little more expensive.
I want to get my hands on a Nikon, I've always been a canon fan and never really played with a Nikon so I'm very sceptical that I'd like it.
Still thanks for the update :)
Actually, I'd love a camera with *fewer* features. Who are they trying to sell these things to? As a photographer, I skipped right over the 5000 in favor of the 7000 just because it seemed less froofy (and some other things). But I'm a traditionalist who would rather be out with a field camera and polaroid film.
I purchased this camera for three main reasons its RAW capablities the 14.7 megapixels it offers and the Leica lens. It has a few nice options, one which I particularly like is the SCN mode for low light portraits. It has a delayed double flash which allows you to balance ambient light with the flash for a more pleasing look.
this camera looks more interesting, easier to use because it is smaller in the DSLR class ..
who knows...
I have the D5000, and was considering this until I looked through the viewfinder. It's a downgrade from the D5000's viewfinder in that (a) you no longer have the option of grid lines and (b) it's now not particularly apparent which autofocusing sensor you've selected. I realize that the D5100 is an upgrade over the D5000 in practically every way, but in this way it's a downgrade. Why in the WORLD did Nikon do this?
Post new comment