NYPD Continues To Restrict Photographers Despite Assurances

Despite assurances from NYPD Commissioner Raymond Kelly that his officers would not interfere with members of the press while doing their job, it was, as always, nothing but talk.

The latest incident took place this morning as Occupy Wall Street activists entered the World Financial Centre to protest against Goldman Sachs.

As New York City police officers began arresting the activists, several officers created a blockade around the arresting officers, preventing the media from documenting it.

One altercation between a photographer who appears to be Robert Stolarik of the New York Times and an NYPD officer was captured in the above video, beginning at the 2:00 mark.

The photographer remains persistent in trying to document the arrests, but the officer keeps moving in front of him.

Finally, the photographer pulls out an iPhone and begins video recording the officer.

Meanwhile, another NYPD officer with a camera is freely recording the activists and journalists.

Check out Stolarik’s photos in this New York Times article, which makes no mention of the officer trying to prevent him from taking pictures.

But the story was picked up by Gothamist.

Last month, after several incidents of NYPD officers arresting, assaulting or restricting reporters from doing their jobs, several media organizations met with Kelly to express their concerns.

According to the National Press Photographers Association, Kelly assured the media organizations of the following:

“Members of the service will not interfere with the videotaping or the photographing of incidents in public places. Intentional interference such as blocking or obstructing cameras or harassing the photographer constitutes censorship. Working Press Cards clearly state the bearer ‘is entitled to cross police and fire lines.’ This right will be honored and access will not be denied.”

Please send stories, tips and videos to carlosmiller@magiccitymedia.com

Comments

I was watching the Long Beach Port live feed this morning and the police where telling everyone that wasn't "approved" media they would be arrested for standing in the same area as the "approved" media.

*Holds up a copies of the Constitution and Bill of Rights*

Here is my approval

Excellent. Too bad most cops have never read either document, or willfully choose to ignore them.

That's what 18USC242 and Citizen's Arrest are for.

"Approved media" is what you have at concerts, sporting events, and other such happenings. This is NOT true of newsworthy events in public spaces. You don't need a press pass (or any other credentials) to photograph things happening on the street. When are the police going to figure this out? Why haven't they figured it out already? It's not terribly complicated.

I realize my questions are rhetorical... just had to say SOMETHING to ease the frustration.

A citizen needs a press pass to photograph an incident happening on a public street, in exactly the same way a cop needs a warrant to arrest someone engaged in a crime on a public street.

how sad that he has to threaten the cop with video...

The problem with cops is always the same, no matter what wrong they are doing. No accountability. They pull shit like this over and over and over again because they CAN. Even when they lose a lawsuit; so what? It doesn't come out of their paychecks or budget, so it doesn't matter.
If you know that every time you lost a lawsuit the penalty was on the taxpayers dime, how much would it discourage bad behavior? Lawsuit money should come out of cops salaries and the dept. budget. After they have been sued so much it's no more shiny new boots, cruisers, and military gear maybe cops would shape up.

I like Mr. Stolarik, but I think he was being too nice to that fat piece of crap. New York's Finest my ass. They look more like New York's Fattest.

Post new comment

Pixiq on Facebook

Join the 10170 Pixiq fans on Facebook

Share

  • Share

Subscribe

Get weekly updates from Pixiq. Short, sweet, and always interesting.