Oakland Cops Arrest Photog Complying With Their Orders
A photographer who snapped a photo of a group of Oakland police officers was ordered to move behind some imaginary line.
The photographer started walking backwards asking "what line" with the cops moving towards him in an aggressive manner.
They kept telling him to move back, which he was doing. One cop orders him across the street, which he did.
They eventually arrested him across the street.
Another videographer captured the scene, showing him clearly complying with the cops' orders.
The incident apparently took place Thursday during a raid of an encampment in front of city hall where 12 people were arrested.
Fujifilm's X-Pro1, now M Mount friendly
Olympus' Micro Four Thirds 75mm prime
Can you fix the focus on a blurry photo after the fact?
The birth of Mirrorless Cameras
The Joy Of Winning A Photo Contest
Choosing your first dSLR camera
New York City can be beautiful!
Choosing the Right Light Stand
Photojojo iPhone Telephoto Lens review — AudioCast
My week with Q
How To Become A Successful Photographer
"When the Wind Stopped" — poem with 4 photos
Creating The New Family Portrait
Tips for Textures
Cast aways - saving those photographic memories
One Man Show: My 25 Years With Digital Photography
Studio, Flash, & Available Light — Three Books Reviewed
Portrait styling: dangerous pairings
Adobe Photoshop CS6 Product Managers Interview Audiocast
A gift of flowers: unfold your senses
On Set of "Love & Robots" the Film
No-Brainer Setup For A Digital Photo Frame Exhibit - Part 3











Planning “National Geographic” style photo travel
Wilderness Travel 1 Rainforests – Essential Gear
Backlighting Basics
What Moves You?
FIGURES IN MOTION: Decades of Evolving Personal Imagery in Photography, Part 7
Lomography Store, Austin, Texas — GALLERY
GALLERY — Up to $1,000 Reward for Cattle Rustlers
25% off on photography eBooks
eyePhone: The eBook for iPhone Photographers
Interview with Harold Davis — Closeup Maestro of Flowers & Water Drops
Interview with Steve Caplin — Photoshop Digital Artist, Commercial Illustrator, & Author
A Brief History Of Light & Photography: Part 3 of 3
A Brief History Of Light & Photography: Part 2 Of 3
Easy technique to select, edit and sequence keywords for web
How much should you charge for a photograph?




































Comments
I wonder what the police report says? And how it differs from the videos..
'In this secretly taken footage, recently smuggled out of America we see the brutal crackdown carried out by police forces...' We're getting to the point where that kind of thing is becoming reality. It's becoming like a freaking 3rd-world country here. The main difference being that most of the population supports it. 'Behind the line'. Bastards.
Joe, oh my God, I've been beaten, laughed at, lied to, sexually abused (at age 17), harassed, falsely arrested, intimidated, humiliated, and failed to do their job by the cops in this country. So many cops are bullies, they have this sense power that they can do what ever they want when ever they want. It's getting out of control, and you're right, the majority of people in this country are either too scared or think they are on the side of the cops and will never be hurt by them. Go to: www.injusticeeverywhere.com and see just how bad this country is becoming 3rd-world and say "good-bye to what little rights you have left".
What fucking assholes listen around 1:02
Photographer- Why am I being arrested?
cop- We asked you to step back you didn't.
Photographer- I stepped back I stepped back I stepped back
Cop- Sideways into our patrol car.
Sadly this is why I really believe there is no such thing as a good cop.
Lying sacks of human shit. Give them a badge they become Gods. I don't know how he could have done anything differently, except perhaps to turn and run.
And, just to point out what the video shows, he never touched their fucking patrol car until they pushed him into it.
God almighty, how much shit do we have to take? I have more faith in the gang leaders than these armed felons. At least the gang leaders aren't going to lie to me and try to convince me they're going to "protect" me.
I've asked this before, and never get a satisfactory answer. If their mandate is to protect and serve, who in the hell protects me from them?
Boomer
You folks really need to drop the dramatics. The guy was deliberately being obtuse about where he was supposed to be. At the :24 mark the officer says they have dealt with him before. They kept pointing behind him. Maybe instead of walking backwards slowly and yelling, he should have just turned around and walked back to where he was supposed to be?
Nah that would be too easy.
So his real crime is he didn't move fast enough? Where in the law does it specify that?
Again JL, bad bust, and just listening to the cops the were looking to bust him.. I wouldn't have turned my back on them either.
No, his real crime is that he intentionally lingered in a restricted area after being told multiple times to leave.
Can you fail any harder there sadist? the tape is absolute proof that he COMPLIED with the officers orders. The DA won't even prosecute this.
So where was this 'line' he was continually told to get behind?
Johnny - the problem I see with your stupid ass remark is that he was being singled out. Why we don't know but we can see in the video that there is another videographer at 00:36 that the police don't seem to care about and also the person filming this is in the restricted area. Why are these two people not being asked to leave this 'area' that the police refuse to define?
Maybe they were official reporters and had been issued press passes.
Normally I read your comments and give them a fair shake, but seriously they need to be "official reporters"?
You spend enough time trolling this site and pretending that you understand the law and your roll in the legal system I would think you would have learned what is legal versus illegal, what is an abuse of authority and what is truly an officer doing their job.
"Normally I read your comments and give them a fair shake, but seriously they need to be "official reporters"?"
Yeah pretty much. Police departments often issue press passes or have a relationship with the major news outlets.
You say that as if a press pass is needed when documenting events that are occurring in public. Again - you have been on this site long enough to realize that the press is anyone and everyone who is willing to document what is going on around them. Press passes issued by the police aren't really worth the paper they are printed on and offer no value or protection to the press they identify. The relationship you reference is that of local media sucking up to the local PD in order to get that sound bite for the 10 o'clock news.
Sorry JL, but you just made my point, he didn't move fast enough for the cop.. Lingering or complying slowly is not a crime.. The videos CLEARLY show compliance, albeit slow.
If the cop had just walked away form the situation and the guy stopped complying you might have something but that isn't the case.. Instead (like 99% of these videos) the cop just keeps pushing his authority.. Yeah there are assholes out there pushing back, if the little cops feelings are hurt TOO BAD! We as citizens don't answer to cops.
"We as citizens don't answer to cops."
Unless you break the law.
That's right, dude. And the cops don't answer to anyone. Case in point right here.
Comment deleted.
Rather get arrested than turn around to get shot from cops for some bullshit reasons.
What is this comedy hour with the Oakland PD
Photographer: Why and I being arrested?
Cop: Because we asked you to step back and you didn't (which is a flat out bald face, pants of fire, 100 percent, total complete, LIE)
From this clip, it appears the police officers were annoyed that the photographer continued to record them. Nowhere do they tell him to stop recording, but their body language, and subsequent arrest, imply that is what they wished.
The photographer is within his rights to record the officers. Police officers often have to do their jobs in the public eye, and I believe they are made aware of this in their training. Depending on the state, like Illinois, the subject needs to know they are being, or could be, recorded. This is a very low threshold, as it is assumed that anyone in public is generally being watched, even peripherally, and should not assume privacy. The photographer/videographer does not need permission to record if it is in a public place, though.
The sum of it: If you don't like people recording what you are doing, then stop doing it.
Post new comment