Photographing police could land you in prison for ten years under new UK law
In case the War on Photography hasn’t sent a chill down your spine yet, this one should do it.
Beginning February 16th, a new law will go into effect in the United Kingdom which would make it illegal to photograph “members of armed forces, a member of the intelligence services, or a police officer,” according to the British Journal of Photography.
How is that for a dose of post-Valentine’s Day reality?
The new set of rules, under section 76 of the 2008 (Counter-Terrorism) Act and section 58A of the 2000 Act, will target anyone who ‘elicits or attempts to elicit information about [members of armed forces] … which is of a kind likely to be useful to a person committing or preparing an act of terrorism’.
A person found guilty of this offence could be liable to imprisonment for up to 10 years, and to a fine.
The exact law can be found here and specifies that “eliciting, publishing or communicating information about members of the armed forces etc.” will be a crime, which means the header on this blog could have me imprisoned if I lived in the United Kingdom.
It would also mean that those citizens who filmed Bay Area Rapid Transit police officer Johannes Mehserle killing Oscar Grant could also be thrown in prison.
Protests against this new law are being planned as we speak. Spread the word.
-30-
I am a multimedia journalist who has been fighting a lengthy legal battle after having photographed Miami police against their wishes in Feb. 2007. Please help the fight by donating to my Legal Defense Fund in the top left sidebar. And feel free to join my Facebook blog network to keep updated on the latest articles.
Don’t forget to cast your vote in the South Florida Daily 2008 Blog Post of the Year contest, where I have three posts in the running.
Can you fix the focus on a blurry photo after the fact?
The birth of Mirrorless Cameras
Choosing your first dSLR camera
New York City can be beautiful!
The Fujifilm Finepix X10, A Review
Choosing the Right Light Stand
Photojojo iPhone Telephoto Lens review — AudioCast
My week with Q
How To Become A Successful Photographer
"When the Wind Stopped" — poem with 4 photos
Tips for Textures
Butterflies in Motion
Cast aways - saving those photographic memories
One Man Show: My 25 Years With Digital Photography
Studio, Flash, & Available Light — Three Books Reviewed
Portrait styling: dangerous pairings
Adobe Photoshop CS6 Product Managers Interview Audiocast
A gift of flowers: unfold your senses
On Set of "Love & Robots" the Film
Ilford Galerie Gold Fibre Silk Inkjet Paper — Audiocast











Planning “National Geographic” style photo travel
Wilderness Travel 1 Rainforests – Essential Gear
Backlighting Basics
A Brief History Of Light & Photography: Part 3 of 3
A Brief History Of Light & Photography: Part 2 Of 3
What Moves You?
FIGURES IN MOTION: Decades of Evolving Personal Imagery in Photography, Part 7
Lomography Store, Austin, Texas — GALLERY
GALLERY — Up to $1,000 Reward for Cattle Rustlers
eyePhone: The eBook for iPhone Photographers
Taking your Portraiture Higher
Interview with Harold Davis — Closeup Maestro of Flowers & Water Drops
Interview with Steve Caplin — Photoshop Digital Artist, Commercial Illustrator, & Author
Easy technique to select, edit and sequence keywords for web
How much should you charge for a photograph?























Comments
If this is for real, we are all eventually going to be subjected to a total police state.
To all of the citizens of the UK. All I can say is you let this happen. Instead of sitting behind a TV and eating fast food burgers and french fries, get out and do something! Maybe, protecting your rights and the rights of everyone around you!
The general populous has become nothing more than sheep, herded by governments.
Terrorists have won. They have done their job. They don’t have to kill anyone any more. They have placed people in a state of constant fear, and now we pay the price.
Our freedoms have been taken and will continue to be torn away from us!
Stuff this new law, the cops film and photograph the public using cctv etc, if we want to film them then so be it
Thanks for your efforts…great blog, and thanks for fighting the good fight.
“which means the header on this blog could have me imprisoned if I lived in the United Kingdom.”
seems like you’re stretching things a bit. i don’t think this is true, carlos.
Am I just seriously deluded in thinking that this battle for “our rights” on most, if not all fronts, is doomed to fail? While it seems possible to stave off the inevitable for some unknown period of time, ultimately the shift in power towards governments (and away from the “governed”) is a trend that appears closely linked to the advance of technology and likely to continue. If not continue to accelerate. Controls on photography are just part of the defensive, counter-intelligence skirmish. Which brings us back to your… um, current legal situation.
As such, where do you see this going? Will individuals reclaim their former “rights” and everything will be well and good in the world? If so, what would you point to as evidence for this belief? Is this just way beyond the scope of your “quest” which is more about clearing your own legal status re; the incident? If you or anyone else could convincingly explain how the subject of your current article is not just a one dimensional signpost towards a 3d, multisensory, near future, I would then be quite happy.
I think it’s important to remember when it comes to civil liberties the UK has a considerably different set of laws & rights than the US
I really don’t think you can make the argument “so goes the UK, so goes the US” – they have laws like the “Official Secrets Act” that would never fly here – books are routinely published in the US that cannot be published in the UK because of their laws – our defamation laws are considerably different too as another example
matt: you’ve obviously never known anyone in the US armed forces. before and during deployment, you can’t publish pictures that show an identifiable face, nameplate, or rank insignia at the same time. Face is cool if you photoshop out the other stuff. or have them remove it.
They get really cranky when people ignore these so called “guidelines.”
I don’t see it as impossible that police would want the same protection, even though i see no reason why they deserve or need it.
Прокат авто. Прокат автомобилей
Post new comment