Photography is no longer a crime in New York City!

nypd



We finally stumbled upon a copy of the Operations Order the New York City Police Department issued to officers last month regarding photographers taking pictures in public.

There really is nothing groundbreaking but apparently these are issues that are not taught in the police academy.

So better later than never.

The document states that the act of photographing and videotaping public places, buildings and structures is not an act of terrorism, which will come to a surprise to many NYPD officers.

The document also states that officers are not allowed to force photographers to delete their images and can only confiscate cameras if there is probable cause that they were used in commission of a crime. For example, child pornography or upskirting, which is actually legal in Oklahoma.

It also reminds officers that photography is allowed within the city’s subway system.

So if you’re based in New York or plan to travel there, I recommend clicking on the above document to enlarge it, then printing it out.

Comments

Anonymous
Anonymous

So if you’re based in New York or plan to travel there, I recommend clicking on the above document to enlarge it, then printing it out.

Might be document fraud…….

Anonymous
Anonymous

(MTA) regulations expressly permit photography . . . although permission is required for . . . the use of additional equipment such as lights and tripods (persons holding valid NYPD press passes may use such ancillary equipment).

So anyone can take photos, but good photography is reserved for members of the establishment. Got it.

Anonymous
Anonymous

The lights and tripods are safety issues. A train operator can be temporarily blinded by bright lights or a flash especially after emerging from a dark tunnel.

Anonymous
Anonymous

The document would be handy to carry around, but somehow I doubt this is going to do much to curb harassment.

Anonymous
Anonymous

by the way, I should point out that I first saw this on Jeremy Bales’ comment on your earlier post about this order being issued, from back in April. Kudos to him for finding it and making it available. I let some friends know about it the other day, and it’s spread around quite a bit!

Anonymous
Anonymous

As for being blinded by flashing lights at night…that’s what red-light cameras do…

Anonymous
Anonymous

“The lights and tripods are safety issues. A train operator can be temporarily blinded by bright lights or a flash especially after emerging from a dark tunnel.”

and … the press pass keeps the light from being blinding … I see it now …

Anonymous
Anonymous

Can someone please tell me – is it illegal to take a picture of someone in a public place if you believe they’re either causing trouble or comitting a crime? What if they’re minors?

Thank you in advance!

Anonymous
Anonymous

RJ: You can take a picture of ANYONE who is in a public place that has no expectation of privacy – even minors.

Anonymous
Anonymous

MTA) regulations expressly permit photography . . . although permission is required for . . . the use of additional equipment such as lights and tripods (persons holding valid NYPD press passes may use such ancillary equipment).

So anyone can take photos, but good photography is reserved for members of the establishment. Got it.

Except for the bit of misinformation about tripod use, it’s a good thing. The geniuses in blue are hung up on the word “prop.” They think a tripod is a “prop” because it “props” up the camera. Unless I’m taking a picture of the tripod, it’s not a “prop.”

NYC Film authority (or whatever it’s called) has regulations about photography in public, but they only apply to 2 or more people, ie, a single photographer doesn’t require a permit.

Anonymous
Anonymous

And another “genius” chimes in.

They can’t be “blinded” unless you put the flash on full power in stick it right their face.

Don’t do much photography, do you?

Dark tunnel??? You did notice that the lights are ON in the subway car and it has bright headlights, didn’t you?

Anonymous
Anonymous

Carlos –

I reread this whole thread again and I disagree with your assertion

“… and can only confiscate cameras if there is probable cause that they were used in commission of a crime.”

The ops order does not require that the camera be used in the commission of a crime only that it

” .. contains evidence of criminal activity…”

I know that I have read a thread somewhere of can the cops seize your camera… Trying to find it.

PS you never sent me the pix of me from NYC

Anonymous
Anonymous

I’ve been swamped since returning from NYC. Haven’t had a chance to edit those photos yet. But I will this week
Carlos Miller´s last blog ..NYC to dish out $98,000 in Critical Mass melee caught on video

Post new comment

Pixiq on Facebook

Join the 7999 Pixiq fans on Facebook

Share

  • Share

Subscribe

Get weekly updates from Pixiq. Short, sweet, and always interesting.