Photos and Video from Rally to Restore Sanity
In the end, sanity wasn’t restored after all.
At least not in my eyes nor in the eyes of the 250.000 people who attended last weekend’s Rally to Restore Sanity in Washington D.C.
But at least Christine O’Donnell didn’t get elected, who only a couple of weeks before the election, proved she had no idea that the First Amendment calls for a separation of church and state.
For me, the rally hosted by Comedy Central’s Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert was a fun excursion but it did not offer as many theatrical photo opportunities as the antiwar protest I photographed in DC in 2005 or the antiwar protest I photographed in New York City in 2006.
The problem from a photographer’s point-of-view is that most people were crammed towards the stage, which made it impossible to walk through the crowds to get good photos as you can during an actual marching demonstration.
But I had a blast anyway and was able to videotape and photograph some of the characters on the outskirts of the crowds, including a trio of cops who were calling for the legalization of marijuana.
There was also the "911 was an inside job" as well as the "911 was not an inside job" people, proving that progressives are the party of diversity.
Before the rally, there was an article in the ultra-conservative Washington Examiner that said photography would be “strictly prohibited” in certain areas of the rally, but I highly doubt that took place.
Everybody had cameras and nobody seemed to have a problem with them.
If anybody has any valid incidents of photography being banned at the rally please pass them along.
I also should say I am very grateful to Borrow Lenses, which delivered a Canon 24-70 f/2.8 L lens to my door two days before I left town because my own lens has been in the shop for more than a month.
I’m told Canon has the needed parts to repair my lens on back-order, so go figure.
This was the second time I’ve used Borrow Lenses and they are very professional and affordable. Highly recommended.
Fujifilm's X-Pro1, now M Mount friendly
Olympus' Micro Four Thirds 75mm prime
Can you fix the focus on a blurry photo after the fact?
The birth of Mirrorless Cameras
The Joy Of Winning A Photo Contest
Choosing your first dSLR camera
New York City can be beautiful!
Choosing the Right Light Stand
Photojojo iPhone Telephoto Lens review — AudioCast
My week with Q
How To Become A Successful Photographer
"When the Wind Stopped" — poem with 4 photos
Creating The New Family Portrait
Tips for Textures
Cast aways - saving those photographic memories
One Man Show: My 25 Years With Digital Photography
Studio, Flash, & Available Light — Three Books Reviewed
Portrait styling: dangerous pairings
Adobe Photoshop CS6 Product Managers Interview Audiocast
A gift of flowers: unfold your senses
On Set of "Love & Robots" the Film
No-Brainer Setup For A Digital Photo Frame Exhibit - Part 3











Planning “National Geographic” style photo travel
Wilderness Travel 1 Rainforests – Essential Gear
Backlighting Basics
What Moves You?
FIGURES IN MOTION: Decades of Evolving Personal Imagery in Photography, Part 7
Lomography Store, Austin, Texas — GALLERY
GALLERY — Up to $1,000 Reward for Cattle Rustlers
25% off on photography eBooks
eyePhone: The eBook for iPhone Photographers
Interview with Harold Davis — Closeup Maestro of Flowers & Water Drops
Interview with Steve Caplin — Photoshop Digital Artist, Commercial Illustrator, & Author
A Brief History Of Light & Photography: Part 3 of 3
A Brief History Of Light & Photography: Part 2 Of 3
Easy technique to select, edit and sequence keywords for web
How much should you charge for a photograph?





























Comments
I love it. Thank you. Do you happen to know where I can watch the whole rally online? All I can find is John Stewart's amazing speech.
Uh, Carlos, you may want to try reading the First Amendment again. As much as I feel that O'Donnell is a fruitcake, she was right. There's nothing in the Constitution about "separation of church and state". What it says is that the government can't create its' own religion, nor can it restrict our right to practice any religion we please, or to not worship at all.
Shawn,
You are partially right, the "separation of church and state" is from a supreme court decision and is not found anywhere in the Constitution. We are a predominantly Christian country and many states had state churches following the ratification of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The 14th amendment changed the legallity of that. The real question comes from WHAT constitutes a violation of this "seperation", and like most other polarizing issues each side takes an extreme view and the reality is somewhere in between.
And the government CAN in very limited ways restrict the practice of religeon. If your religion calls for human sacrifice you aren't going to be able to say, "yeah we sacrificed that guy to god" and get away with it..
Elliot,
"A Wall Separation" the phrase that "Seperatoin of Church and State" is based, is thought to be first used by Thomas Jefferson in 1802, in a letter to the Danbury (Conn.) Baptist Association. Reading the original draft of the letter, the published version and the reviewer's remarks, tend to indicate at the letter was of a political nature and not an interpretation of the First Amendment.
Thank you! I've tried to tell many a person this after she said that on TV. Just like Palin's Russia remark, it's horribly misconstrued. I may not agree with either of their politics 100%, but that's no reason to be dishonest about what it. She was completely correct in saying that the constitution does not mention "seperation of church and state".
BORROWLENSES.COM rocks...great people, great business! if there are any carousel miami users out there, switch!
Post new comment