A lot of dSLR for not-a-lot of money

‘What camera would you recommend?’ It happens to Team Photocritic&Small Aperture quite a bit. Mostly we get it from people who are looking to buy their first dSLR or from very generous types who want to buy one as a gift. (Wouldn’t we all like someone like that in our lives?).
And then we do something really irritating; we answer a question… with a question. It’s not that we don’t want to recommend cameras; we both love talking about them and want people to enjoy taking photos as much as we do. Why do you think that we keep writing about that magical mash-up between technology and artistry that is the mysti-tastical world of Photography?
As with so many other questions in life, there isn’t a hard-and-fast answer. So here is a few different answers for you…
Why go dSLR?
Usually, there are two reasons that people have for shelling out on a dSLR. If someone’s buying it for herself, it’s because she is frustrated by the limitations of a point-and-shoot and wants all the glorious control and gorgeous creativity that comes with a dSLR. If a fairy-godmother is bestowing a fabulously generous gift on her fairy-godson, she’s normally recognised some photographic talent that she wants to let him explore. The reasons for buying a dSLR are pretty obvious, then. Our question, therefore, is what does someone want out of the camera.
Maybe it’s better low-light capability. Is it for the speed you get when shooting sports? Perhaps it’s wanting to explore macro more. How about wanting to how a go with video? It might be about giving someone a good start in the dSLR world. Or it could be all of these things rolled into one and wrapped up with a ribbon?
Then we ask how much someone has to spend. That’s a pretty significant consideration. Knowing this, we might make a recommendation.
Now that it is coming up to Christmas, we’re getting more people than normal ask us for our words of wisdom. To this end, we’ve been doing some thinking (don’t ask how much it hurt our brains, it was verging on excruciating, we’ve only just recovered). What we’ve done is to come up with some suggestions for cameras that we think offer the best value for money if you’re launching yourself, or someone you love, into the wonderful world of single lens reflex photography.
The contenders
There are six major manufacturers out there who make dSLRs: Canon, Nikon, Olympus, Panasonic, Pentax, and Sony. None of them is going to sell you a ‘bad’ dSLR.
Let’s get one thing out of the way before we go any further. The camera body you choose is least important. More important are the lenses attached to the camera. Most important? The person taking the pictures. In general, if you’re just starting out, that’s the order you should be spending money in: Buy a cheap camera body, expensive lenses, and spend a small fortune on learning everything you can. Buy books, go on courses, spend time on Flickr, DeviantArt, and PhotoSig – etc.
However, depending on how the camera is going to be used, which brand you choose becomes more significant.
This means that we’ve thought about this from three perspectives: people who want a bit of everything from their camera, and will probably upgrade in the future; people who know that they’ll probably want to upgrade sometime soon, but can make do without all the bells and whistles available on dSLRs; and people who aren’t necessarily going to want to upgrade, but need a good all-rounder.
I want something that does everything, and I can build on as I get better
If you’re looking for a solid all-round performer that is going to launch the career of a fledgling dSLR photographer, you should be considering cameras from Canon, Nikon, and Pentax. Why? Well, once you’ve bought into a camera brand you’re pretty much stuck with it. Lenses, which are the expensive bit in this photography fandango, are brand-specific. Once you’ve spent several thousand pounds on Nikon glass, you’ll not be wanting to replace it if you suddenly decide to switch to a Pentax body.
Canon, Nikon, and Pentax manufacturers offer the best range of glass and the best progression in bodies; if this is meant to be the start of a long dSLR journey, this is what’s important. It’s not that Panasonic, Olympus, and Sony are bad, but it’s possible that Olympus won’t be making dSLRs forever, Sony has been a bit disappointing recently, and I don’t think that Panasonic has the best range.
So what do the chosen three have to offer for a photographer who wants to get a good all-round experience? From Canon it’s the 550D (or T2i if you’re State-side), from Nikon the D3100, and Pentax delivers the K-x. Yeah, I’ve gone for the K-x here, not the brand-spanking new K-r. If we’re talking about starting out, and value-for-money, then you don’t necessarily need to buy the latest model.
They all offer good low-light performance, video mode, lots of lovely lenses, big screens, and enough megapixels to satisfy a high-street electronics shop camera salesman. (Megapixel-count does seem to be their only sales pitch.)
Not all about price
In terms of price alone, the Pentax K-x wins, hands-down. It’s an older model and available at bargain prices. But, price isn’t all that’s important. How a camera feels in your hands and how you like its interface are critical to your photo-taking enjoyment. If you’re frustrated by your camera’s knobs and levers, or if it’s too heavy or uncomfortable to hold, you’ll probably find yourself resenting using it. That’s counter-productive and a waste of money.
Definitely not all about price
Another few points to consider.
The Nikon D3100 has received rave reviews. We’re talking waxing lyrical here. And if you are going to compare it against the newer Pentax K-r, it beats the K-r on price.
I use a Canon, and so do some of my friends. My brother is thinking of getting a camera. Chances are, it’ll be a Canon. He’s already comfortable using mine and, bonus, I’m a generous big sister who’ll lend him bits and pieces of my kit, just as my friends lend me bits of theirs. We’ve these amazing expanding kitbags. You should try one sometime, they’re available from all manufacturers and good friends.
If you’re interested in using your dSLR to make video, then Canon really is where it’s at. (To quote Philip Bloom, one of the pioneers of dSLR film-making, there’s nothing quite like the Canon 5D mkII.) Whilst at entry level there isn’t heaps to choose from, as you upgrade it’ll become more important.
And finally, one of my friends commented that buying Pentax cameras and kit in the UK is a real pain because it isn’t a widely stocked brand. I already have enough problems finding clothes that fit me; I don’t want buying camera kit to be a similar struggle. It’s also tough finding places that hire out and repair Pentax kit, too. This might not be immediately important, but don’t rule it out from your criteria.
But what about price?
I can’t tell you which to buy, you need to decide that for yourself, but I can tell you that they’re all available on Amazon:
Canon 550D + 18-55mm kit lens £635 from Amazon UK or T2i + 18-55mm kit lens for $835 from Amazon US.
Nikon D3100 + 18-55mm kit lens for £470 from Amazon UK, or $630 from Amazon US.
Pentax K-x + 18-55mm kit lens for £405 from Amazon UK or around $490 from Amazon US.
Ehm, I don’t have quite so much to spend
That’s okay. When I decided that I was in photography for the long-haul and bought my first dSLR, I didn’t have a fortune to spend. It didn’t stop me, though.
When you buy a dSLR you’ll be getting a good camera whatever you buy. We’ve already said that. We’ve already said that spending money on lenses is more important than on the body. So this means that if you’re prepared to fore-go some of the bells and whistles on higher-spec cameras, for example by dropping video capability (it doesn’t bother me) and losing a few megapixels of resolution (which in the grand scheme of things isn’t that significant), you can get yourself some complete bargains in camera-land.
Again, if you buy into Canon, Nikon, or Pentax, you’ll be able to build up a collection of lenses, and then upgrade the body when you feel that you can.
So what’s on offer right now? You know, the best deal is the Canon 1000D (Canon Rebel XS in the US). You get a great sensor and processor, access to heaps of lenses, the opportunity to save up for 60D when you can, and all for under £350 in the UK (Amazon), or $500 in the US (also Amazon), with a kit lens. Of course this’ll mean that you’ve signed up to Canon, but if you like the camera and what it does, it’s all good.
You know, I just want a dSLR
For some people, being able to upgrade bodies and keep pushing themselves photographically isn’t a priority; all they want is the creativity and control afforded by a dSLR. For these people, looking at a Panasonic, an Olympus or a Sony isn’t a bad idea. Neither is looking at a Canon, Nikon, or Pentax, but these others are likely to come in a bit cheaper.
To be fair, if my Ma suddenly turned around and told me that she wanted a dSLR, I’d probably advise her to buy a Canon 1000D and then use it to photograph the herd of pigs flying past her kitchen window. But I wouldn’t turn up my nose at a Sony Alpha 290, neither. With lots of lenses to choose from in addition to an 18-55 mm kit lens, in-camera image stabilisation, and a 10 megapixel sensor it’d give her everything that she needs for about £315 on Amazon UK or $415 from Amazon US. Right now, this makes the α290 cheaper than its Olympus or Panasonic equivalents, but of course that might not always be the case.
So, no hard-and-fast answer?
No, there’s no hard-and-fast answer. Think about what it is that you want from a camera, both now, in a year’s time, and in several years’ time; consider how much you have to spend; and then go with what feels right. Remember that lenses are more important than camera bodies, and you’re more important than both of those.
If it’s any help at all, I recently contemplated upgrading to a Canon 60D. I decided against it for two primary reasons: first, what I use right now does exactly what I need and I’d rather spend the money on lenses; second, the 60D felt too large and too heavy in my tiny hands. Lenses and feel take priority for me and they really should for you, too.
Whatever you choose, though, enjoy it.
Do you enjoy a smattering of random photography links? Well, squire, I welcome thee to join me on Twitter - Follow @Photocritic
© Kamps Consulting Ltd. This article is licenced for use on Pixiq only. Please do not reproduce wholly or in part without a license. More info.
Fujifilm's X-Pro1, now M Mount friendly
Olympus' Micro Four Thirds 75mm prime
Can you fix the focus on a blurry photo after the fact?
The birth of Mirrorless Cameras
The Joy Of Winning A Photo Contest
Choosing your first dSLR camera
New York City can be beautiful!
Choosing the Right Light Stand
Photojojo iPhone Telephoto Lens review — AudioCast
My week with Q
How To Become A Successful Photographer
"When the Wind Stopped" — poem with 4 photos
Creating The New Family Portrait
Tips for Textures
Cast aways - saving those photographic memories
One Man Show: My 25 Years With Digital Photography
Studio, Flash, & Available Light — Three Books Reviewed
Portrait styling: dangerous pairings
Adobe Photoshop CS6 Product Managers Interview Audiocast
A gift of flowers: unfold your senses
On Set of "Love & Robots" the Film
No-Brainer Setup For A Digital Photo Frame Exhibit - Part 3











Planning “National Geographic” style photo travel
Wilderness Travel 1 Rainforests – Essential Gear
Backlighting Basics
What Moves You?
FIGURES IN MOTION: Decades of Evolving Personal Imagery in Photography, Part 7
Lomography Store, Austin, Texas — GALLERY
GALLERY — Up to $1,000 Reward for Cattle Rustlers
25% off on photography eBooks
eyePhone: The eBook for iPhone Photographers
Interview with Harold Davis — Closeup Maestro of Flowers & Water Drops
Interview with Steve Caplin — Photoshop Digital Artist, Commercial Illustrator, & Author
A Brief History Of Light & Photography: Part 3 of 3
A Brief History Of Light & Photography: Part 2 Of 3
Easy technique to select, edit and sequence keywords for web
How much should you charge for a photograph?






































Comments
Buying a dSLR is buying into a system. Therefore the camera itself is only one (minor) aspect. Buy good glass! Or stay with a P&S.
Your article came in just the right moment for me! I’m pressed (by developing and scanning costs) to change from analog to digital, but don’t want to pay too much for a dSLR at this point. As I’ve been shooting with Minolta, Sony came as a natural choice. I’ve been looking into the a290 and a230 with a pinch of skepticism, but will give the a290 another thought.
I’m going to second the benefits of shooting the same system as your friends and family. Six or seven of my photographer friends at my high school all ended up choosing canon, as we share lenses and bodies like crazy, so that instead of having access to just my 4 lenses, I can borrow 15 others if I need to at any time. Its really useful
I personally went Pentax, which is a non-shocker to a regular reader of this site given my one and only article here. Having said that, if the “system” is what is being bought into, then I think Canon or Nikon is likely a better choice. Having said that, the vast majority of people buying will not get beyond the basic kits, so the “system” is irrelevant. Either way, whatever the buy, it’s going to be good gear.
Buy the way, anyone reading this who does decide to go Pentax, if you have the money to spend, get a K-5. It’s simply a joy to use. The best camera upgrade I’ve ever made.
A high end P&S like the Samsung TL500/EX1 is quite compact and sells for only 300 quid/350 dollars. Its low light performance is only a stop or even half a stop worse a DSLR with its kit lens. I would personally buy it if I know I won’t be expanding my lens collection beyond the kit lens if I wind up buying a DSLR.
The DSLR-on-a-budget route to me can be worthwhile if I get a body-only and then buy some fast prime glass like the 35 or 50mm f1.8 lens. Then again the kit lens is quite versatile and sells for a pretty penny on ebay so I might get it anyways.
I’d rather buy a used/refurb/low end Canon or Nikon DSLR than venture for the lesser brands.
I think Sony sells its bodies for cheap or even at a loss but profits by forcing you to buy their overpriced proprietary accessories.
Olympus fanboi reporting for duty!
“…but it’s possible that Olympus won’t be making dSLRs forever,…” I’m not sure how this is relevant – those mirror-less cameras olympus may or may not turn to, will still be using the same 4/3rd lenses, meaning any investment you make now, will still be useful then.
There are a few big disadvantages and a few advantages to buying olympus, but their future strategy isn’t one of them.
Then which are? Glad you asked (if only..).
Advantages:
– Price: On average, everything olympus is cheaper (body, lenses, flashes, …)
– Size: The olympus bodies & lenses are damn small. I always laugh when I see other photographer walking around with massive lenses, only to find out they cover the same range as my tiny ones. This isn’t only more convenient, it also saves you a lot of back/shoulder pain because of the reduced weight.
– RC Flash: While pro’s can just buy pocketwizards, consumers don’t have that kind of money – with olympus you can control external (olympus) flash units with your camera, without additional costs. That said, I assume the newer generation canon/nikon will have this too.
- Cleaning system, live view auto-focus, 10x zoom on live view (ideal for manual focus in macro photography), …
Disadvantages:
– No cheap prime. The Canon 50mm 1:1.8 costs like 60$, the Olympus 50mm 1:2 costs 500$. It can be used for macro though (1:1).
– Small market. You’ll have a hard time finding Olympus gear on ebay.
– Sub-optimal noise handling. The consumer bodies aren’t as good at noise/long exposures as their canon/nikon counterparts.
i started with Olympus OM1 back in the day…my daughter now shoots with it for class.
i went nikon and lenses but for a recent trip – i wanted to keep it simple. Olympus lured me with the SP800UZ. it has so many built in options/features and great results.
i know nikon is most popular (same daughter works for a photographer who uses only nikon)
as a woman the canon felt too clumsy in my hand (subjective)
thanks again for the info! cheers – pia
Hi im new to phoyography and why im getting into it ,is becourse i have a canvas art printing site,i do all the printing and all photos are taken by in house photographers and they take stunning picture ,so any tips any are good tips Thanks
Thanks a lot for this post! It was just what I needed, I’m currently considering buying a second hand Canon reflex, and I’m hesitating between two models (mainly for eoconomic reasons): 1000D and 450D. I know the latter is better than the former, but is it worth the 50/100€ gap? I really don’t know which one to pick. Any suggestion would be gladly appreciated :)
I’d echo another comment above about Olympus – for the “You know, I just want a dSLR” (without needing to upgrade), I think it’s head and shoulders above the others due to size and weight.
(And I say that although I’m happy with Canon myself.)
The amazing availability of used lenses on eBay gives a photographer a lot of freedom. If you are willing to give up autofocus and auto-aperture, you can get fabulous manual 35mm film camera lenses for a song.
I had a Ricoh 35mm film camera for many years. When I bought a digital SLR, I got a Canon 20D. Lovely camera, but does not use the same lenses. I bought new lenses for it and although I did not go top-of-the-line, they were expensive.
A year ago I bought an inexpensive Pentax K-2000 because the Ricoh was a Pentax K-mount camera. Because I can use my old Ricoh lenses with the Pentax, the lenses are basically free.
Each camera has its personality and I like them for different things. I’ve added additional lenses through eBay for both — it’s not hard to find a really good lens for $30 to $50 if you are willing to go with an older, manual-focus lens. There are great articles on Wikipedia detailing the various lens mounts so that you can figure out which defunct brand lenses will go on your new digital camera.
nice …….
Post new comment