Polarisers - what they do and why
The one filter you might still find a use for

With so much possible in post–production is there any point in carrying filters these days? I always divided filters into two categories – those you often use and those you try once. In the first category, came polarizers, warm up filters, graduated neutral density filters….
In the other category belong those filters described as ‘effects’ filters – starbursts, color graduates (those awful tobacco filters), multiple image filters and so on cliché after cliché– if you have the urge you can do much more creative/weird things in Photoshop.
How Polarizers work
What we call visible light occupies a very small portion of a map called the electromagnetic spectrum – which arranges electromagnetic waves according to their wavelength. Radio waves lie at the long wavelength end and as wavelength decreases we move through, microwaves, infra-red, visible light, ultra violet to X rays and gamma radiation. Light travels as waves and associated with the light waves is an electric field that varies at right angles to the direction of travel – it is what is called a transverse wave. In normal light the variation is in all directions perpendicular to travel – with polarized light just one direction is selected by the polarizer. The plastics used in a polarizer have their molecules in long chains so and we can think of the polarizer as a kind of molecular grid or set of railings through which the light passes. When the grid and the electric field are aligned everything passes through - when they are at 90° (crossed polarizers) nothing gets through.

Polarizers are useful in photography because light when scattered or reflected is partly polarized. And these filters can be used to select or cut this light.

a. Blue Skies
The process of light scattering by molecules in the upper atmosphere creates a blue sky. This light is partly plane-polarized and the effect is most pronounced when you stand at 90° to the sun – face the sun and then turn through a right angle either to your left or right. The effect is dramatic - as a polarizer is turned it deepens the blue and seems to show up whispy clouds you did not even know were there. It is great for those ‘inviting travel shots but should be used with care: with a low angled sun it can produce skies which are almost black.
At one stage, I used a polarizer for those blue-skied happy shots beloved of travel brochures Nowadays, I far prefer what I can do with the amazing ND (neutral density) filter in Lightroom 3. However, a polarizer still works well for some things... call it nostalgia but I still carry a circular polarizer so read on…
There are two other areas where a polarizer can still come in handy:
b - Reflections from Water
When light is reflected from all non-metallic surfaces, it is partly polarized. As you rotate a polarizer whilst looking into water, reflections are cut and you are able to look below the surface - especially if the light reaching you comes at about 53° measured with the vertical to the surface (The Brewster angle or polarization angle). You can alter the effect to produce partial transparency when photographing rivers and streams.

If you want to do the same with glass and cut surface reflections you change the angle slightly (56°) because the refractive index ‘n’ (the bending power) of the light is different from that of water and that slightly affects the Brewster angle (q)
For those with a mathematical bent – or even bent mathematically
tan q = n
where n = refractive index: for common window glass this is 1.5 for water 1.33
The idea is behind such things as the way polaroid sun glasses cut reflections from road surfaces or water and also the transmission of light through the windows at the ends of laser tubes.


C - Intensifying Colors in nature.
Surfaces of leaves, grass and flowers can all reflect light - careful use of a polarizer cuts down some of the reflected light and make colors appear more intense. This is especially good for large areas of vegetation in a landscape with a variety of greens – in bright light the surface reflection from leaves makes then appear grey and a polarizer makes the colors seem far warmer.
If you are trying to get a deeper blue to the sky and cut refection from the surface of water in a lake you have to set a compromise because it is unlikely both will be polarized in the same direction.

Linear and Circular Polarizers
Circular polarizers are recommended for use with autofocus cameras since ‘linear polarizers can affect the function of the autofocus system. These incorporate an extra layer - a 1/4 wave filter - which changes the ‘phase’ of the light and allows the autofocus system to function. Polarizers are expensive and if you use both autofocus and manual focus bodies it make sense to standardize on circular polarizers. The problem I have found is that unless you pay a premium price for one of these bits of glass you get an unwanted side effect – a color tint that changes as you rotate the filter from slight green to magenta.
Graduated Neutral Density Filters
Whilst on the subject of filters I used to carry a set of Neutral Density (ND) flters when doing medium and large format film work…no more. It was always tricky with smaller formats and you had to align horizontals. When the contrast difference between land and sky is too great a ND filter can help. I find in my work that the ND function in Adobe Lightroom – one of much that is great about that program works amazing well…and I can add several at different angles…Those expensive filters are now in what has become my museum cupboard along with a series of film bodies.

NB Diagrams taken from 'The Complete Guide to Close-up and Macro photography' by Paul Harcourt Davies published 1998 sadly now out of print entirely thanks to its disinterested British publisher and a lack-lustre marketing department who did far less to promote it and secure marketing deals than the author did...though, naturally, they took the bread!
Fujifilm's X-Pro1, now M Mount friendly
Olympus' Micro Four Thirds 75mm prime
Can you fix the focus on a blurry photo after the fact?
The birth of Mirrorless Cameras
The Joy Of Winning A Photo Contest
Choosing your first dSLR camera
New York City can be beautiful!
Choosing the Right Light Stand
Photojojo iPhone Telephoto Lens review — AudioCast
My week with Q
How To Become A Successful Photographer
"When the Wind Stopped" — poem with 4 photos
Creating The New Family Portrait
Tips for Textures
Cast aways - saving those photographic memories
One Man Show: My 25 Years With Digital Photography
Studio, Flash, & Available Light — Three Books Reviewed
Portrait styling: dangerous pairings
Adobe Photoshop CS6 Product Managers Interview Audiocast
A gift of flowers: unfold your senses
On Set of "Love & Robots" the Film
No-Brainer Setup For A Digital Photo Frame Exhibit - Part 3











Planning “National Geographic” style photo travel
Wilderness Travel 1 Rainforests – Essential Gear
Backlighting Basics
What Moves You?
FIGURES IN MOTION: Decades of Evolving Personal Imagery in Photography, Part 7
Lomography Store, Austin, Texas — GALLERY
GALLERY — Up to $1,000 Reward for Cattle Rustlers
25% off on photography eBooks
eyePhone: The eBook for iPhone Photographers
Interview with Harold Davis — Closeup Maestro of Flowers & Water Drops
Interview with Steve Caplin — Photoshop Digital Artist, Commercial Illustrator, & Author
A Brief History Of Light & Photography: Part 3 of 3
A Brief History Of Light & Photography: Part 2 Of 3
Easy technique to select, edit and sequence keywords for web
How much should you charge for a photograph?






































Comments
So basically linear polarizers are still useful because light reflected from a surface (car, water, window, etc) is polarized in the plane of the surface -- you can either turn the polarizer parallel to that surface to see the reflected image, or perpendicular to that surface to see inside/under.
The notable side-effect of a linear polarizer is that autofocus won't work.
What good are circular polarizers? I see little or no use to them.
Hi Chris,
In the digital age with autofocus cameras it is linear polarisers that are less used because they cause problems with the phase detection systems employed in AF mechanisms. The circular polarizer is a good general device because it has another coating 1/4 wavelength thick (an average wavelength) that changes the phase of a light wave by 90°. If you buy a circular polarizer it works with both AF and manual lenses.
As I mentioned the problem I have found unless one pays top dollar for one of these is that they do cause a shift from magenta to greenish cast. OK you can take it out later but...
Paul
Hi Paul,
Is there some source that explains AF mechanisms using phase detection? I've never found anything about this.
Regarding the colour casts, when do you observe them? I noticed some colour changes when looking through a circular polarizer the wrong way round and rotating it.
Simon
Nice text
and it's great to find that Iam not alone not using polarizers much. I feel the same about them. Not for ND grads, I do use them, although I agree with you that LR does a good job at that if you've not done it in the field.
As for your book now out of print... why not take the matter into your hands and do an eBook (if you've the right to use all material, as the author) and self publish it using places like e-junkie? Just an idea.
Jose Antunes
Thanks José,
Funny you should mention the ebook(s) because its all very much the intention and well-advanced. I managed to get back my rights for that and a later book on Outdoor Photography and greatly updated they will form the basis for a series of ebooks. The Q&A closeup book for Lark is almost done and that will be a good basic guide but for a long time I have wanted to produce something that went a lot deeper than any book I was allowed to publish..so it will be done in parts as an ebook series and collaboration with Clay Bolt.
In fact, I was greatly encouraged by what you wrote on ebooks and it gave a push to my intentions. I have just come back from Crete leading a party of botanists and photographers so am catching up with emails and image filing...next the ebooks.
Paul
Paul
if I may ask, what are you using to do the eBooks? I mentionned LR as an option but that was just for... "domestic" work. (You can email me directly if you prefer). I would suggest inDesign for a professional job.
Jose
Thanks for such a thorough and cogent explanation, Paul. I am familiar with most of the material but was unaware of the Brewster Angle.
Hello Keith,
My poor befuddled brain has forgotten much of what I had to plough through when doing Physics but there are some useful snippets that surface at random even though I have gone the other way and am more interested in the non-technical aspects of photography.
The Brewster angle is a good trick to use. It is amazing how when you set the camera and then turn the polarizer that the water seems to become 'clear' I was going to say transparent ...which water is anyway ..but now you see into the depths. It is great for rock pool, pond and stream photography and also darkening the surface of a larger body of water in a landscape.
Excellent article. The only filters I carry are a CP and a set of ND grads. The CP is as you said, a double edged sword, but I wouldn't be without it for daytime outdoor photography. I'm hardheaded and learn from experience, so it took me a while to learn by trial and error what you've nicely spelled out here!
you can also combine a circular with a linear polarizer, resulting in a variable ND filter (http://www.digital-photography-school.com/create-your-own-variable-neutr...)
hi sir
nice job
buetiful picture
uh, what is the ND function in LR???
I have LR and that is news to me that there is a Neutral Density function within LR..
Can you school me please?
Post new comment