RAW usage up massively
There are tons of reasons for using RAW instead of JPG when you’re taking photographs. Your photos will be sharper, you will be able to unlock your camera’s full dynamic range, and you have a better flexibility over things like white balance.
It seems as if people are cottoning on in a big way, too – I ran a poll about 2 years ago about whether people were shooting in JPEG or RAW… And I re-ran the same poll earlier this month.
The changes are staggering…
2 years ago
Early 2007, 36% used Raw mostly or exclusively. 55% used JPEG mostly or exclusively:
Today
Today, a whopping 66% of you use Raw mostly or exclusively, and only 26% still prefer to shoot in JPEG:
Why’d this happen?
Hey, I think if you read the three articles linked at the top of this blog post, it’s pretty clear why I stopped taking photos in JPEG… But I’d love to hear about your reasons in the comments…
Can you fix the focus on a blurry photo after the fact?
The birth of Mirrorless Cameras
Choosing your first dSLR camera
New York City can be beautiful!
The Fujifilm Finepix X10, A Review
Choosing the Right Light Stand
Photojojo iPhone Telephoto Lens review — AudioCast
My week with Q
How To Become A Successful Photographer
"When the Wind Stopped" — poem with 4 photos
Tips for Textures
Butterflies in Motion
Cast aways - saving those photographic memories
One Man Show: My 25 Years With Digital Photography
Studio, Flash, & Available Light — Three Books Reviewed
Portrait styling: dangerous pairings
Adobe Photoshop CS6 Product Managers Interview Audiocast
A gift of flowers: unfold your senses
On Set of "Love & Robots" the Film
Ilford Galerie Gold Fibre Silk Inkjet Paper — Audiocast











Planning “National Geographic” style photo travel
Wilderness Travel 1 Rainforests – Essential Gear
Backlighting Basics
A Brief History Of Light & Photography: Part 3 of 3
A Brief History Of Light & Photography: Part 2 Of 3
What Moves You?
FIGURES IN MOTION: Decades of Evolving Personal Imagery in Photography, Part 7
Lomography Store, Austin, Texas — GALLERY
GALLERY — Up to $1,000 Reward for Cattle Rustlers
eyePhone: The eBook for iPhone Photographers
Taking your Portraiture Higher
Interview with Harold Davis — Closeup Maestro of Flowers & Water Drops
Interview with Steve Caplin — Photoshop Digital Artist, Commercial Illustrator, & Author
Easy technique to select, edit and sequence keywords for web
How much should you charge for a photograph?


































Comments
My main reasons for start shooting exclusively RAW were actually the ones said in the first chapter, especially with white bal and dynamic range.
Before moving to RAW I experienced some HDR-shooting, with poor results. I did really not find any common day use for HDR in my photography. It's a cool effect, but you have to be careful not to put it on every single scenery shot. Just like with this Dave Hill effect, IMO.
Now I have been using only RAW for about one year. I shoot everything in RAW, photogigs, customer projects, things home, personal projects. All.
Storage usage has though, not sky rocketed but got higher since moving to RAW, but hey. Disc quota usage is nothing to the fact that you can get more out of the RAW images.
Post new comment