So now the feds say it is not illegal to photograph federal buildings
It took four months but the United States Department of Transportation finally responded to a query from the ACLU asking it to clarify its policy on the act of photographing its buildings.
Turns out, there is no such policy forbidding the photography of DOT buildings in Washington DC.
The response from the U.S. Dept. of Transportation acted as if it were only an isolated incident in which a security guard was misinformed about the policies regarding photography. It offered an apology for that particular security guard.
But the truth is, there has been a pattern over several years of DOT security guards forbidding photographers from taking pictures of its buildings.
Much of it has been documented by photographer Erin McCann, who provided Photography is Not a Crime with the response from the US DOT, which also included a 2004 “special security bulletin” from the U.S. Department of Homeland Security regarding the photography of federal buildings.
The bulletin makes it clear that there are no restrictions of taking pictures of federal buildings from the outside, especially if you are not standing on federal property.
The bulletin also states that it is permissible to photograph “building entrances, lobbies, foyers, corridors or auditoriums for news purposes.”
This, of course, brings up the old debate about who is a journalist and who is not a journalist or what is newsworthy and what is not newsworthy.
As there is no federal law defining what makes a journalist, so this pretty much makes it acceptable for anybody to take pictures of these areas.
The bulletin also states that it is permissible to take pictures inside federal buildings as long as permission is obtained; verbal permission for non-commercial photography and written permission for commercial photography.
The bulletin also encourages security guards to harass approach photographers and conduct “field interviews” to determine that they are plotting to blow up the building with their cameras.
So perhaps Luis Martinez can now remove the foot from his mouth.
Get all outdoorsy with Pentax's Optio WG2 and WG2-GPS
Canon's complement of compacts
How to use a grey card
We’re All Bozos On This Bus--The Red Bus to Hell
Worlds Fastest Camera
The New Sony NEX 7
Choosing your first dSLR
Photojojo iPhone Telephoto Lens review — AudioCast
Photo Accessories that Fail Security Checks
My week with Q
Studio equipment buying guide for beginners
VSCO Film Studio Review
Lessons in Lighting
The russellgraves.com Photo Minute - Truck Blinds
Photographing Children in the wedding party
Cattle Country
Creative Photo Valentine Surprise
How to Use Multiple Lights for Dramatic Portraits
Making your own flash diffuser
LR4 free presets: Faded series
Using Sync for Video in Develop
A gift of flowers: unfold your senses
On Set of "Love & Robots" the Film
My Night with Ilford Galerie Gold Silk Fibre
FOTOMOTO - Why I Left











Silhouettes & Photo Contests
Cyan, not just another color
Our 26 best photo projects of 2011
Family Ties That Bind
Animal Group Portraits
A Brief History Of Light & Photography: Part 3 of 3
A Brief History Of Light & Photography: Part 2 Of 3
Lightroom Interview: Kevin Tieskoetter
Always Dream Big
Gallery: Embedded with the Territorial Army
Getty Villa Malibu — 4 Old Faces, 1 Sunken Garden — GALLERY (6 photos)
Wildlife photography for the masses
The 110 page guide to post-processing
How much should you charge for a photograph?
Santa Pictures + Marketing for your Business






























Comments
i guess all the meter maid jobs were taken so they gave this fuckstick a job at homeland security?
Here’s a suggestion o how you can find out if it’s ok Carlos.
Why not go downtown and stand across the street from the federal courthouse complex and start taking pictures? Take lots of pictures.
Use your telephoto lens.
Make sure you focus on the federal lock-up.
And then come back and post a few pictures and let us know how it went.
Carlos, why am I not surprised about DHS agent Luis Martinez? If he’s the same agent I had to deal with, I can’t thank you enough.
You would think that before he said something he would check his facts first. I had the opportunity to be investigated and questioned by him. I didn’t think he was very astute. I did feel that he tried to bully me but it didn’t work.
He’s filed charges against me and was not the victim, not involved in the situation and has no relationship to the situation but, he filed charges against me with the county PD. The charge from the county doesn’t list a victim either. The charges have nothing to do with federal property or federal funds. My good friend said that I simply pissed him off and he needed to get even with me.
Your post is enlightening. Thanks once more. I’m going to sign up for your RSS and will make a small donation shortly.
About Luis Martinez and his competency. He recently filed charges against a friend of mine. The charges were so screwed up that it’s impossible to believe. They claimed that he was confused and that’s why he made so many errors. Do we really need confused law enforcement agents walking around with loaded weapons?
Post new comment