So now the feds say it is not illegal to photograph federal buildings


It took four months but the United States Department of Transportation finally responded to a query from the ACLU asking it to clarify its policy on the act of photographing its buildings.

Turns out, there is no such policy forbidding the photography of DOT buildings in Washington DC.

The response from the U.S. Dept. of Transportation acted as if it were only an isolated incident in which a security guard was misinformed about the policies regarding photography. It offered an apology for that particular security guard.

But the truth is, there has been a pattern over several years of DOT security guards forbidding photographers from taking pictures of its buildings.

Much of it has been documented by photographer Erin McCann, who provided Photography is Not a Crime with the response from the US DOT, which also included a 2004 “special security bulletin” from the U.S. Department of Homeland Security regarding the photography of federal buildings.

The bulletin makes it clear that there are no restrictions of taking pictures of federal buildings from the outside, especially if you are not standing on federal property.

The bulletin also states that it is permissible to photograph “building entrances, lobbies, foyers, corridors or auditoriums for news purposes.”

This, of course, brings up the old debate about who is a journalist and who is not a journalist or what is newsworthy and what is not newsworthy.

As there is no federal law defining what makes a journalist, so this pretty much makes it acceptable for anybody to take pictures of these areas.

The bulletin also states that it is permissible to take pictures inside federal buildings as long as permission is obtained; verbal permission for non-commercial photography and written permission for commercial photography.

The bulletin also encourages security guards to harass approach photographers and conduct “field interviews” to determine that they are plotting to blow up the building with their cameras.

So perhaps Luis Martinez can now remove the foot from his mouth.

Comments

Anonymous
Anonymous

i guess all the meter maid jobs were taken so they gave this fuckstick a job at homeland security?

Anonymous
Anonymous

Here’s a suggestion o how you can find out if it’s ok Carlos.

Why not go downtown and stand across the street from the federal courthouse complex and start taking pictures? Take lots of pictures.

Use your telephoto lens.

Make sure you focus on the federal lock-up.

And then come back and post a few pictures and let us know how it went.

Anonymous
Anonymous

Carlos, why am I not surprised about DHS agent Luis Martinez? If he’s the same agent I had to deal with, I can’t thank you enough.

You would think that before he said something he would check his facts first. I had the opportunity to be investigated and questioned by him. I didn’t think he was very astute. I did feel that he tried to bully me but it didn’t work.

He’s filed charges against me and was not the victim, not involved in the situation and has no relationship to the situation but, he filed charges against me with the county PD. The charge from the county doesn’t list a victim either. The charges have nothing to do with federal property or federal funds. My good friend said that I simply pissed him off and he needed to get even with me.

Your post is enlightening. Thanks once more. I’m going to sign up for your RSS and will make a small donation shortly.

Anonymous
Anonymous

About Luis Martinez and his competency. He recently filed charges against a friend of mine. The charges were so screwed up that it’s impossible to believe. They claimed that he was confused and that’s why he made so many errors. Do we really need confused law enforcement agents walking around with loaded weapons?

Post new comment

Pixiq on Facebook

Join the 9993 Pixiq fans on Facebook

Share

  • Share

Subscribe

Get weekly updates from Pixiq. Short, sweet, and always interesting.