South Florida Cop Convicted For Lies Caught On Dash Cam Video
A South Florida cop who was caught on a dash cam fabricating a story that would have protected a fellow cop was convicted of falsifying records Tuesday.
It is not clear how many years in prison Dewey Pressley is facing, but we can be certain he will probably serve no time.
At least that’s the way it normally works for cops convicted of committing crimes.
But even if he doesn't go to prison, the conviction should send a strong message to other cops who twist the truth.
Dewey Pressley will be sentenced December 21, according to the South Florida Sun Sentinel. 
In 2009, the Hollywood police officer responded to a collision between fellow officer Joel Francisco, who had rear-ended a woman.
The woman, Alexandra Torrens-Vilas, had been drinking, so she was arrested for DUI.
However, Pressley didn’t want Francisco to get blamed for the accident, so he conjured a story that would pin the blame on Torrens-Vilas.
Or as he would call it, a little “Walt Disney.”
And he would have gotten away with it if it weren't for the dash cam video.
Here are excerpts from the transcript:
First cop: And there is no reason in your head whether you keep a safe distance or not, you would be anticipating someone to abruptly slam on the brakes unless you see a large object coming and especially — as far as I am concerned I am going to put words in his mouth. She went to accelerate a cat jumped out, literally a cat jumped out the window at which time as he thought
Second cop: (Laughing) .
First cop: – could have been a pedestrian, which distracted him because he was concerned and that’s normal. And before he comes to a stop, boom. Hey.
Second cop: A. (Unintelligible) .
First cop: Actually, I mean I wouldn’t expect a cat to come out. I mean it could have been a fucking kid jump out the fucking window.
Second cop: That’s exactly what I thought. I didn’t know what the fuck was going on.
***
First cop: Yes. Just let me space the whole thing out. i will do the narrative for you. I know how I am going to word this, the cat gets him off the hook.
First cop: Well, is there any way — this is what I want to articulate that she was in this lane and cut over to this lane. It was at the angle what I tried to do with my head on camera is follow the cat. If the cat were to jump you could get to her exactly. That’s what I want.
I will write the narrative out for you. I will tell you exactly how to word it so it can get him off the hook.
Second cop: Okay
***
First cop: Well, I don’t want to make things up ever, because it’s wrong, but if I need to bend it a little bit to protect a cop I’m gonna. You see the angle of her car –
Second cop: Yes.
First cop: You see where it’s like this?
Second cop: Yes.
First cop: As far as I am concerned I am going to word it she, is in the left hand lane.
Second cop: Okay.
First cop: And when the cat jumped out she abruptly got over to this lane and slammed on the brakes.
***
First cop: Andre. .. Andre, come here a minute. We’ll do a little Walt Disney to protect the cop because it wouldn’t have matter because she is drunk anyway. You see the angle of her car? You see where the collision is?
Cop taking pictures of “evidence”: Okay.
First cop: You have already taken photographs yes or no?
Cop taking pictures of “evidence”: Yes.
First cop: Is there any way — this is what I want to articulate that she was in this lane and cut over to this lane. It was at the angle what I tried to do with my head on camera is follow the cat. If the cat were to jump you could get to her exactly. That’s what I want.
You don’t have to get any pictures I need or any whatever, because I don’t want Joe to get any (unintelligible). That’s not fair to him. She is freaking hammered anyway.
Cop taking pictures: No problem.
Joel Francisco, who was also charged, has yet to go to trial.
Fujifilm's X-Pro1, now M Mount friendly
Olympus' Micro Four Thirds 75mm prime
Can you fix the focus on a blurry photo after the fact?
The birth of Mirrorless Cameras
The Joy Of Winning A Photo Contest
Choosing your first dSLR camera
New York City can be beautiful!
Choosing the Right Light Stand
Photojojo iPhone Telephoto Lens review — AudioCast
My week with Q
How To Become A Successful Photographer
"When the Wind Stopped" — poem with 4 photos
Creating The New Family Portrait
Tips for Textures
Cast aways - saving those photographic memories
One Man Show: My 25 Years With Digital Photography
Studio, Flash, & Available Light — Three Books Reviewed
Portrait styling: dangerous pairings
Adobe Photoshop CS6 Product Managers Interview Audiocast
A gift of flowers: unfold your senses
On Set of "Love & Robots" the Film
No-Brainer Setup For A Digital Photo Frame Exhibit - Part 3











San Diego 7 photo gallery — Just Be Love All Stay Cool
Planning “National Geographic” style photo travel
Wilderness Travel 1 Rainforests – Essential Gear
Backlighting Basics
What Moves You?
FIGURES IN MOTION: Decades of Evolving Personal Imagery in Photography, Part 7
Lomography Store, Austin, Texas — GALLERY
GALLERY — Up to $1,000 Reward for Cattle Rustlers
25% off on photography eBooks
eyePhone: The eBook for iPhone Photographers
Interview with Harold Davis — Closeup Maestro of Flowers & Water Drops
Interview with Steve Caplin — Photoshop Digital Artist, Commercial Illustrator, & Author
A Brief History Of Light & Photography: Part 3 of 3
A Brief History Of Light & Photography: Part 2 Of 3
Easy technique to select, edit and sequence keywords for web
How much should you charge for a photograph?




























Comments
Drats! Foiled again by that pesky dash cam!
Ex-cop acquitted of conspiracy charges in crash cover-up.
A Broward jury on Tuesday convicted a former Hollywood cop of lying about a road wreck involving a fellow officer, but acquitted him of the felony conspiracy charges that could have sent him to prison for 30 years.
http://www.sun-sentinel.com/news/broward/fort-lauderdale/fl-hollywood-co...
Is this one of those good news/bad news stories..
You got convicted of X but Y got dismissed, you are still toast but not as crispy..
Having just finished reading the article I was a little saddened that they dropped the DWI charges. Obviously she HAD been driving and she was drunk right?
Still the most important point is the police misconduct.
When will cops learn, cameras are your friend, if you aren't doing anything wrong...
While Carlos is right, he'll probably get probation, this is pretty reprehensible.. He should get at least a year.. If for no other reason to make a point.
What I'm curious about is how an accident being the drivers fault would have affected her legal troubles. I can't see how it wouldn't have only made them worse, in addition to the accident involving a cop no less.. While she should absolutely get dinged for the DWI I would tend to think they would be obligated to treat it as if she had just gotten pulled over and no accident was involved at all.. Kind of like... Shia Lebouf (sp?) He was drunk got into an accident that no one claimed was his fault but he still got dinged for DWI..
Also apparently this isn't the first time his official testimony has been questioned..
http://blogs.browardpalmbeach.com/pulp/2009/07/lying_walt_disney_cop_inv...
Ahem..
ibid
This guy is an embarrassment. Good riddance to him.
JL,
I'm sorry to put it this way but it *seems* that the only time you don't defend one of these guys is when there is ZERO question he is in the wrong. And no possible argument that:
1. Something happened before the recording started to justify it.
2. We misunderstood what he said.
This makes it difficult for us to take you seriously and you come off as little more than an apologist.
In the end what this means is that after watching video after video, I and most like me tend to stop giving authority figures the benefit of the doubt. We no longer assume honesty from police in particular.. Perhaps you might do your profession a favor and speak out..
@Elliott
So you are chastising me for not condemning police misconduct in response to a comment I made in which I condemned an officer for misconduct? Very interesting position...
I'm sorry that you are unhappy about me not breaking out the pitchforks whenever an allegation of misconduct is made without proof. Anyone can make complaints that an officer arrested them for no reason or used excessive force. I get that you have zero trust in the police but it *seems* to me that you are very eager to believe any allegation about the police simply because an officer in involved. You can complain about my lack of objectivity but you have made it very clear that you are just as biased in the other direction.
Show me evidence that a cop lied, arrested someone just for taking video or used excessive force (actual excessive force, not someone's dislike of police tactics) and I will be happy to say they need to go. However I have been there when a situation unfolds quickly and a split second decision gets made. The courts understand that officers don't have to make the best decision under pressure. They just have to make one that is objectively reasonable.
So I will just chug on being a police "apologist" and you can continue on being a police critic.
@JL
No, what I am chastising you for is the appearance that there "must be some reason we didn't or couldn't see for this to happen" mentality. If it isn't completely obvious to 100% of the people "there must be some good reason". Provided you are really a cop, you MUST see things daily that you could only sit back and go "WHY", people do inexplicable things.. Yes you chastised this cop, and that is good but what if it were not so black and white? Those are the cases where you seem (my perspective) to basically give them a pass. That is my point.
I've seen some videos on here that I am not sure whether the cop was acting right or wrong, but many more where it is more obvious they are in the wrong. In sooo many of those it appears you want to try and explain away the behavior. That reads as apologist.
I have zero trust in the police because when they are talking to you they "are looking for guilt not for innocence". This is a direct quote from a cop that I have, in the intevening years, heard repeated by others. I have seen here and in life cops flat out lie about things that happened. These are not little things that really mean very little but things that are important and serve to justify their actions. And funny thing is I don't run with a crowd that has much interaction with the police.. So yes, pardon my skepticism.. I know, understand, and am always willing to admit my biases, why not..
I am not eager to drink anyone's koolaide, I watch the videos and decide for myself. In far too many cases the cop escalates the contact himself because the alleged perp doesn't do what he was told, even when what he is being told has no basis in LAW.
As a point of fact the cop who pulled Anthony Graber over and got out of his car waving his pistol would probably have been dead if I had been Anthony. He didn't identify himself as a cop for 4 full seconds and judging by the car and his atire you couldn't tell he was a cop. You exit your car waving a pistol, I am not going to assume you are a cop, I'm going to assume you are a perp and act accordingly..
We have seen videos here of people being approached by police and them demanding things that legally they have no right to like ID and then acting like pissy little bitches when the person they are talking to don't sufficiently bow and scrape. Then all of a sudden they are getting arrested for disorderly conduct. You don't need to know who I am, you can ask but I don't have to tell you in most cases. Its a consent contact right? I don't consent, if you have probable cause, REAL probable cause lets here it, until I do all you are going to get is "I'm sorry I don't speak to police, have a nice day" and continue about my business. Thats called exercising a fundamental constitutional right and the Supreme Court has stated that "exercise of a fundamental right does not give rise to probable cause", for the lawman, you can't turn me asserting 4th and 5th amendment rights into probable cause. For example "no you may not search my car" != probable cause.
And lets be real the only time a camera is going to be a problem in interactions with police are if you are actually breaking the law, whether you be a cop or a citizen.. I like the videos of the stupid perps who beat themselves up and then claim brutality, I saw a couple just 2 days ago..
I have no problem being labeled a critic, on the other hand if I see good behavior, like we did by that California officer a couple months ago who was checking out the open carry unloaded pistol fella, I will absolutely say so. That guy was very professional and a model for cops everywhere. If I had to deal with a guy like that I might be more willing to interact with police. I'm just not willing to give cops the benefit of the doubt anymore.. If that makes me a critic then so be it.
He was dismissed on all of the felony counts. Those were the only charges that would have actually sent him to prison.
He was guilty of falsifying records; 1st degree misdemeanors. He was acquitted on the conspiracy to falsify, official misconduct, etc.. the felonies. How is that video not proving him conspiring to falsify the records??
I'm going to have to question the jury on this one.
How much do you all want to bet that:
1.) He keeps his pension (he's served over 20 years and this isn't a felony)
2.) He won't be stripped of his law enforcement certification (once again, this isn't a felony)
That's why he's smirking.
And this is why I have difficulty giving a shit when a cop gets killed.
I wonder just how much jury intimidation by uniformed cops in the courtroom played into this?
he must have got the Anthony jury
Post new comment