The best camera is one you actually use

blurry-haje

Those of you who are following @photocritic on Twitter (or, in fact, if you were paying attention to the RSS feed), can’t have failed to notice that I was out on the road. If you’re making a particularly good job of stalking me, you’ll also have noted a load of photos posted to my Flickr stream, most of which were taken with my iPhone, and some of ‘em were taken with my little Canon Digital Ixus camera.

Yes, that’s right, I was out globetrotting – on a motorcycle, to be precise. Due to the extremely limited space I had available to me, I didn’t bring my full assortment of lenses with me. In fact, I only brought a single lens; My mighty fine Canon 50mm f/1.4 prime lens (I know I keep banging on about it, but you need a prime lens). Then, as I was traveling around, something very, very interesting happened; I didn’t use my SLR camera at all.  

 

What? No SLR?! You call yourself a photographer?!

I know, it surprised me, too; I brought my little Canon digital IXUS camera with me as a back-up camera, in case something happened with my big camera. And in case I was planning on going out drinking, in which case I consider the IXUS to be as close to you get as a disposable digital camera (have you noticed that you never lose anything you don’t really worry about losing, and always lose or drop your expensive stuff? Exactly…)

So anyway, I was riding along, and the first 1,500 miles, it was raining, and I had my Canon EOS 450D in the top box of my motorcycle. Which means that in order to actually get to it, I would have to:

  • Spot something awesome
  • Get on the brakes, nearly causing an accident with the car driving behind me
  • Park the bike
  • Put the bike on its side-stand
  • Take the key out of the ignition
  • Unlock and open the back box
  • Take the camera out of the back-box
  • Take off my gloves and helmet (can’t use the SLR with my helmet on)
  • Point the camera, take the photo
  • Put the camera back in the back-box
  • Close and lock the back-box
  • Get back on the bike
  • Start the bike
  • Ride off into the sunset

By comparison, taking pictures with my Digital Ixus was much easier; I was less worried about it getting wet, so I just carried it in the inside pocket of my leather motorcycle jacket. That means it’s protected from the rain by my outter rain layer and the jacket itself. As it turned out, this was more than a-plenty: The camera came out perfectly dry every time. Because of this, it was a lot easier to take photos:

  • Spot something awesome
  • Get on the brakes, still nearly getting myself killed because cage-drivers never pay attention, and because my motorcycle brakes are an order of magnitude better than any car brakes
  • Find somewhere safe to stop, and hold the bike upright with my thighs
  • Reach in my inner pocket
  • Point the camera, take the photo
  • Put camera back in inner pocket
  • Ride off into the sunset

All about the opportunism and impulsivity

Now, the fact that I was able to stop on a whim, fish out a camera without having to stop the motorcycle’s engine, without having to lock and unlock the suitcase strapped to the back of the bike, and without having to take my gloves and helmet off, meant that I started the trip taking photos with the Ixus…

… And then never stopped. Sure, at one point (after it stopped raining, of course) I moved the 450D into the tank bag, so it would be easily accessible, but even then, the hassle of taking my helmet off (you’d be surprised: I have to take my gloves off, take my glasses off, then undo the buckle, pull it off of my head, put it somewhere safe so it doesn’t fall off. Then when I want to put it back on, I have to put my ear-plugs (or headphones, if I’m in a music-kind-of-mood) back in, because they invariably get unsettled by taking my helmet off) seemed like too much of an obstacle to bother.

So, despite riding 3500 miles through some of the most amazing landscapes known to man (Seriously, if you’ve never been to Norway, I highly recommend riding or driving from Oslo to Bergen via the Hardangervidda road over the mountain pass, and then follow the coast around all the way to Kristiansand. You’ll be awestruck in the original sense of the word), I never really felt inclined to dig out my SLR camera. In fact, of all the things I brought with me in my (admittedly very limited-spaced) luggage, there were only three things I didn’t use: My long underwear (It never got cold enough to warrant putting them on), my Tyreweld kit (because I didn’t have any punctures) and my Canon EOS 450D.

Needless to say, when you’re on the road for 3 weeks, it gives you a lot of time to think. In the last week, I spent a lot of time wondering if perhaps I should dig out my SLR camera and try taking some photos. And yet, I never did. Which made me think; am I really so lazy that I’m willing to pass up the opportunity for some awesome photos, just because I can’t be arsed digging out a proper camera?

But… Why?!

Part of the reason, I think, is that this tour was never really meant to be a photo tour – if it were, I think I would have taken the time. This trip was meant to act as punctuation between my previous job (which I hated with the passion of an iberian street argument), and my my new job as a writer. But ultimately, I’m still a photographer at heart… So why?

Then it dawned on me; the very same argument for not being bothered to dig out a proper camera is the precise reason why the Apple iPhone is topping the lists for most uploaded photos on Flickr, and why camera phones are so incredibly popular: Phones, by their very nature, have to be very accessible: It’s no good having a telephone which needs to be locked out of a case, taken out of a protective pouch, and pampered into life before you can answer a call. It rings, you fish it out of your hand-bag or pocket, you answer it. This accessibility – and expectation of accessibility – is what makes camera phones such great photography tools; reaching for your mobile phone has become a well-trained movement, whereas most of us are more careful with our cameras. When going out on the lash for a night, you do bring your phone, but you might not bring a camera, for example.

I know I have been slightly schizophrenic in my reaction to camera phones; my hatred of their poor quality optics and results is stemmed by their accessibility (‘everyone’ has a mobile phone, and I defy you to find a mobile phone which doesn’t have a camera on it these days) and ubiquitous presence. Formally, and officially: Camera phones are a good thing. I’ll tell you why:

On this trip, I discovered that having a compact camera which I use is infinitely better than a SLR camera that I don’t use, even if the latter has has the potential for much better photos than the former.

The best camera you own is the one you actually end up using… and that’s worth keeping in mind when you pack for a trip, I think…


Do you enjoy a smattering of random photography links? Well, squire, I welcome thee to join me on Twitter -

© Kamps Consulting Ltd. This article is licenced for use on Pixiq only. Please do not reproduce wholly or in part without a license. More info.

Comments

Anonymous
Anonymous

I know exactly what you are talking about. My cell phone has a pretty nice camera as far as cells go, and I use it all the time. It is just so convenient. And, I have actually captured some cool candid street photography with it. I have a collection of just pictures I have taken of people riding the train.

Anonymous
Anonymous

My shoulders sometimes wish I felt the same way whilst on trips / holidays… Honestly, Inca trail with a chokkers full Lowepro CompuRover AW… Beautiful pics, horrid chiropractors bill… Yay for the Ixus (every now and then)

Sime

(and having just done a similar trip in Norway, I second that!)

Anonymous
Anonymous

I recently bought a Sigma DP1 for just this reason. It takes pictures as good as my 50D, but it fits in my coat pockets. I carry it everywhere when I don’t have my SLR with me to take “photos of opportunity”.

Mind you, the DP1 is slow and inflexible, so it’s not that good as a general purpose camera. But its amazingly sharp prime wide-angle lens coupled with its SLR-sized sensor takes great, sharp pictures. It’s great as a second camera.

Anonymous
Anonymous

Another great article as always! This is why I’m dying to get my hands on a quality compact camera – I have one but it’s truly rubbish – so I don’t have the hassle of carrying my dslr and its lenses all the time

Anonymous
Anonymous

Couldn’t agree more. Right now I’m planning this year’s holidays. I’m going to cross an ocean and spend 20 days roaming through Mexico, and weight and size is a problem. So I’m leaving the big Canon aside in this trip and bought a small compact camera that fits in my pocket. And I’m not leaving yet, but most of my shots are made with the camera lately, just because it fits in my pocket, and I don’t have to do the usual procedure of spotting something, hoping for it to be repeated or here by the time I can find a break to go with the camera, then go home because the sky was auful, coming another day and doing the damn shot. It’s just stop, grab the camera out of the pocket, shot, and go, clean and fast. And after using it a couple of weeks I don’t feel so guilty about leaving the Canon here on the trip.

Anonymous
Anonymous

Being the lazy type I use my phone camera alot for shear convience, and to good effect.

Anonymous
Anonymous

I concur I recently had to buy an emergency back up camera on a trip I picked a Lumix FS8 the best i could find at Walmart.
It was a liberating camera I am blown away by the results and I was able to keep handy and pull it out where ever I was… It was and IS the camera I use…
My next camera will be a better Lumix I am looking at the one with a 24mm F 2 lens but I am in good shape the $150.00 I spent at Walmart was a great investment in changing my idea of what a great camera is all about.
Pete

Anonymous
Anonymous

There isn’t that much difference in quality between your average SLR and compact camera, is there? Sure, you don’t have the flexibility of different lenses, which is what makes SLRs essential to any serious photographer. But, on holidays, that’s hardly an advantage. I just came back from a 3 weeks holidays in southern France/Italy and I hardly ever changed my lens (I only have two, 14-42 and 50-150). It simply wasn’t worth it.

The only essential difference in quality seems to be chromatic aberration. At least the (not very compact) compact camera I used before I got my dslr had horrid chromatic aberration. But hardly anyone even notices that.

Don’t forget about the weight. On a motor trip it might not be so noticeable, but when trekking through towns on foot, the camera bag becomes a nuisance after a couple hours. No such issues with compact camera’s.

Anonymous
Anonymous

Recently I’ve started shooting with a Zenit and b&w film, although I have a canon DSLR. It really doesn’t matter so much what camera you are using as long as you feel comfortable with it and you like the results.

Anonymous
Anonymous

Absolutely. If you want to be a good photographer, you have to have a camera with you all the time. I wrote about this same thing at http://www.backgroundexposure.com/blog/2006/11/the-constant-camera/ using an example of my son.

Personally, I don’t think the cameras on cell phones are good enough for more than snap-shots but it’s better than having nothing.

– Brian

Anonymous
Anonymous

And this is why I sold my SLR and bought a Canon G10

Post new comment

Pixiq on Facebook

Join the 8001 Pixiq fans on Facebook

Share

  • Share

Subscribe

Get weekly updates from Pixiq. Short, sweet, and always interesting.