The war on cell phone cameras begins
The economy is in shambles. The war is costing billions. And the country is adjusting to a new president (thank God).
But what does a New York Congressman want to do?
Outlaw cell phone cameras that don’t make a clicking sound when you press the shutter.
The “Camera Phone Predator Alert Act” was introduced earlier this month by Pete King, a republican who believes too many children have been “exploited by photographs taken in dressing rooms and public places with the use of a camera phone”.
The bill makes no mention as to why children would be in a dressing with an adult stranger in the first place, but it would mean the children would hear a clicking sound when photographed by this stranger.
(a) Requirement- Beginning 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, any mobile phone containing a digital camera that is manufactured for sale in the United States shall sound a tone or other sound audible within a reasonable radius of the phone whenever a photograph is taken with the camera in such phone. A mobile phone manufactured after such date shall not be equipped with a means of disabling or silencing such tone or sound.
(b) Enforcement by Consumer Product Safety Commission- The requirement in subsection (a) shall be treated as a consumer product safety standard promulgated by the Consumer Product Safety Commission under section 7 of the Consumer Product Safety Act (15 U.S.C. 2056). A violation of subsection (a) shall be enforced by the Commission under section 19 of such Act (15 U.S.C. 2068).
I’m sure there will be plenty of proponents of this bill, especially when reading stories like this one where a former Los Angeles police officer was convicted of “eight misdemeanor counts of secretly photographing underage girls for sexual gratification.” But the article does not specify whether he was even using a cell phone camera.
Most pedophiles, I would imagine, probably use long lenses. Either that or they already are on friendly terms with the child where a clicking sound is not going to make a difference.
And can you imagine a room full of clicking cell phone cameras?
I would rather hear the president.
Instead of cracking down on pedophiles, the bill would criminalize anybody with a cell phone camera that does not make a clicking sound. I can just imagine a civilian photographing a case of police brutality only to wind up in jail because his phone didn’t warn the cops that they were being photographed.
In fact, the majority of commenters on two of the most respected tech sites are also skeptical of this bill.
And as The Guardian in the U.K pointedly asks: What is the camera going to do when it records video. Make a whirring noise?
-30-
I am a multimedia journalist who has been fighting a lengthy legal battle after having photographed Miami police against their wishes in Feb. 2007. Please help the fight by donating to my Legal Defense Fund in the top left sidebar. And feel free to join my Facebook blog network to keep updated on the latest articles.
Don’t forget to cast your vote in the South Florida Daily 2008 Blog Post of the Year contest, where I have three posts in the running.
Of if you need to buy a camera or any photo-related equipment, please purchase it through the B&H store by clicking on the ad at the top right hand corner. With each purchase, they send me a few dollars towards maintaining this site.
Fujifilm's X-Pro1, now M Mount friendly
Olympus' Micro Four Thirds 75mm prime
Can you fix the focus on a blurry photo after the fact?
The birth of Mirrorless Cameras
The Joy Of Winning A Photo Contest
Choosing your first dSLR camera
New York City can be beautiful!
Choosing the Right Light Stand
Photojojo iPhone Telephoto Lens review — AudioCast
My week with Q
How To Become A Successful Photographer
"When the Wind Stopped" — poem with 4 photos
Creating The New Family Portrait
Tips for Textures
Cast aways - saving those photographic memories
One Man Show: My 25 Years With Digital Photography
Studio, Flash, & Available Light — Three Books Reviewed
Portrait styling: dangerous pairings
Adobe Photoshop CS6 Product Managers Interview Audiocast
A gift of flowers: unfold your senses
On Set of "Love & Robots" the Film
No-Brainer Setup For A Digital Photo Frame Exhibit - Part 3











San Diego 7 photo gallery — Just Be Love All Stay Cool
Planning “National Geographic” style photo travel
Wilderness Travel 1 Rainforests – Essential Gear
Backlighting Basics
What Moves You?
FIGURES IN MOTION: Decades of Evolving Personal Imagery in Photography, Part 7
Lomography Store, Austin, Texas — GALLERY
GALLERY — Up to $1,000 Reward for Cattle Rustlers
25% off on photography eBooks
eyePhone: The eBook for iPhone Photographers
Interview with Harold Davis — Closeup Maestro of Flowers & Water Drops
Interview with Steve Caplin — Photoshop Digital Artist, Commercial Illustrator, & Author
A Brief History Of Light & Photography: Part 3 of 3
A Brief History Of Light & Photography: Part 2 Of 3
Easy technique to select, edit and sequence keywords for web
How much should you charge for a photograph?


























Comments
Completely retarded. Republicans like this will ensure it will be decades before we get back in power.
You don’t have to imagine a room full of clicking cell phone cameras because the next step is to outlaw the photography of public figures “for national security”.
FYI, I keep a LiveJournal full of notable stories relating to our crumbling freedoms, if anyone is interested. http://capnsurly.livejournal.com/
Thanks,
Chaz
In addition, I propose sirens on video recorders.
Nice work, Chaz, I have to figure out a location to blog roll that. I might have to create a new section.
Sirens with flashing lights. Yes, Rick, that is probably next.
But I guarantee you that the civilians will be the only ones walking around with noisy cameras.
The cameras they are watching us on will remain silent.
It won’t get anywhere, and will die in committee. But whoever lives in new york that has that Peter T. King as a representative needs to call his office and say “what the hell are you thinking, knucklehead?”
seriously.
Clicking sound on a phone? Seems this congressman has way too much time on his hands.
the bill would criminalize anybody with a cell phone camera that does not make a clicking sound
except that it doesn’t – read the entire proposed legislation, notice there are no criminal penalties, no mentions of criminal sanctions, no mention of misdemeanor/felony/infraction, nada zip nilsky zed zero nope noway nohow nope nyet nein non
the onus is entirely on the manufacturers and sellers, there is no consumer civil or criminal penalty whatsoever in the proposed law – you can lawfully carry a cell camera that doesn’t “click”
if the law is violated, it’s a CPSC matter between the CPSC and the device manufacturer, same as selling an aspirin bottle without a safety cap
But Officer Brad, this has not even become a law yet, so who knows it will end up if it is ever passed.
It’s really a stupid bill that will not prevent the exploitation of children. If it were only that easy.
Here is Peter’s website. (Especially if you live in his district) contact him and tell him how asinine this bill is.
http://peteking.house.gov/index.shtml
This is just one more example of predator paranoia. People are so focused on strangers and predators they miss the people that do the most harm to children, the PARENTS. This stranger and predator focus we have in this country puts children at increased risk.
If a man helps a lost child he’s likely to be accused of abducting the kid with no basis in fact. This makes it less likely for upstanding citizens to get involved in helping and protecting lost kids.
Pete King it is time to stop wasting the publics time and money on things like this and concentrate on the real problems.
duane kerzic
I think this bill would be more effective if it required cell phone cameras to emit a fart-like noise every time a picture was snapped. Such a noice would certainly be noticed by a child (why, just the other dayI let one go in a bookstore and a kid in the same aisle pointed and told his mom, “Mommy he made a smelly!”) and particularly by women who, of course, never fart. Of course some of us who tend to be old and gassy would become immediate targets of female rage (“You! You just took my picture!” “Why no, ma’am, I had beans for lunch.”) but it would be worth it if one pervert was caught in the act.
Don’t you think?
Did you know your email box is full and rejecting mail!
Yeah, I just took care of it. Fucking Go Daddy.
There is a law like this in Japan. There it’s impossible to turn the click sound off on your phone. As someone who lived there I can say that it honestly wasn’t that big a deal. You can still take a picture, there’s just a little noise. It’s not really stepping on any right in my opinion. Personally I’d like to know if someone was taking a picture of me!
When the country is in dire need of economic recovery, it is a waste of time.
I hope this guy never gets elected again.
Of course he completely ignores the fact that most of stories regarding children and inappropriate photos are examples of the youth in question taking their own picture and emailing or texting to classmates. A noise is going to make a hell of a difference there.
Post new comment