Time Magazine addresses the issue of cops vs photographers


Time Magazine becomes the latest mainstream media company to report on the ongoing epidemic of people getting arrested for photographing police.

In a piece published today, Adam Cohen, who is described as a lawyer and a former Time writer as well as former member of the New York Times editorial board, states that police officers are wary of being videotaped because they fear being publicly embarrassed and scrutinized.

Cohen mentions the Anthony Graber case as well as the Tasha Ford case, the latter which has been getting some national press after more than a year of the media ignoring it.

In fact, the Palm Beach Post finally reported on the Ford case this month, even though the arrest took place in their back yard more than a year ago.

From the Time Magazine piece:

The legal argument prosecutors rely on in police video cases is thin. They say the audio aspect of the videos violates wiretap laws because, in some states, both parties to a conversation must consent to having a private conversation recorded. The hole in their argument is the word “private.” A police officer arresting or questioning someone on a highway or street is not having a private conversation. He is engaging in a public act.

Even if these cases do not hold up in court, the police can do a lot of damage just by threatening to arrest and prosecute people. “We see a fair amount of intimidation — police saying, ‘You can’t do that. It’s illegal,’” says Christopher Calabrese, a lawyer with the ACLU’s Washington office. It discourages people from filming, he says, even when they have the right to film.
Ford was not deterred. According to her account, even when the police threatened her with arrest, she refused to turn off her video camera, telling her son not to worry because “it’s all on video” and “let them be who they continue to be.”


The police then grabbed her, she said, took her camera and drove her off to the police station for booking.
Most people are not so game for a fight with the police. They just stop filming. These are the cases no one finds out about, in which there is no arrest or prosecution, but the public’s freedoms have nevertheless been eroded.

Ford was right to insist on her right to videotape police actions that occur in public, and others should too. If the police are doing their jobs properly, they should have nothing to worry about.

Last week, the New York Times addressed the issue of photographers getting harassed for photographing trains by bringing up the Duane Kerzic case, which was the first time it was mentioned in the Times, even though he was arrested a few subway stops from the Times building.

And in the last few weeks, the Washington Post, ABC News, MSNBC, NPR , Popular Mechanics and USA Today have all been addressing the issue of citizens getting arrested on wiretapping charges for videotaping police.

The Washington Post, in fact, has done an exceptional job of highlighting these incidents by compiling a list of ten incidents of photographers getting harassed in the Washington DC area for taking photos.

But that list neglected to mention the arrest of Nancy Shia, a 61-year-old elected official who was charged with assault on a police officer in 2008 for photographing a police officer during a protest.

Comments

Anonymous
Anonymous

This is some great, mainstream media news, for once. Besides being happy that national publications are reporting it, I’m also enjoying how they are scrambling to jump on the bandwagon for this story.

I’m 36, so I’m old enough to remember the days before the internet when EVERYONE got their news from one of only three sources. The evening news on ABC, CBS or NBC. The morning paper was just a re-hash of what we watched the night before.

I love being part of the information age and I think this story (photographers being detained, arrested, etc. in public) is a great example of how the internet and blogging is starting to level the playing field. What I’m REALLY waiting to see now is a story in one of these mainstream rags that addresses WHY they’ve ignored this story for years.
Rob recently posted..Photography Is Not A Crime

Anonymous
Anonymous

They try to make the argument that this is illegal because of the audio recording, not the video. But you know if a video was posted with no audio they would say it doesn’t paint the whole picture because there was no audio recorded.

Anonymous
Anonymous

Like you have time, but there’s a group on Flickr called DC Photo Rights. There are some general DC pics, but many include encounters with police/security about photographing public buildings from public streets.

FYI: http://www.flickr.com/groups/dcphotorights/

Anonymous
Anonymous

I think these punk cops need to be put in their place once and for all. Enough of their “God” complex.

Jo
http://www.web-privacy.at.tc

Anonymous
Anonymous

I side with photographers in this case mainly because it is legal to take a cops’ photo in a public places – especially when they are engaged in a public act. However, I do think occasionally some people do like to provoke the cops for the sake of provocation. And that is where it becomes questionable to me. I know where the law stands – so snap away. But if a cop can tell if a photographer is pushing it a bit don’t expect them to just smile and wave.

Photographers have to accept that sometimes they have to fight for their First Amendment rights. But if they can defuse the situation and still get the photos then all the better.

Post new comment

Pixiq on Facebook

Join the 10199 Pixiq fans on Facebook

Share

  • Share

Subscribe

Get weekly updates from Pixiq. Short, sweet, and always interesting.