Pixiq

"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."

Let me throw this in here as well...
“Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them.” Miranda v. Arizona, 384 US 436, 491.

When will people stand up? Hard to mis-interpret the fourth amendment. These searches are both unconstitutional and illegal.

Don't give me that bullshit about choosing not to fly. I like my civil rights and I choose to not let Fatherland Security chip away at them.

I don't get it....why do people have a problem
with fat little stupid people groping their breasts
and crotches under the guise of "security."

Oh yeah, enjoy the flight...

Save the drama for the theater lady.

Videos like this are excellent ways of revealing authoritarians (I won't say who, but he's easily identified by the implied worship of statute above all else in his chosen name) who reflexively have contempt for citizens who cannot simply comply with the government's arbitrary and useless invasions of privacy. The authoritarian believes these policies to be fair and reasonable simply because they are the legally binding.

Throughout history, authoritarians have similarly approved of much worse kinds of government abuse towards its citizens, using the exact same reasoning. Their tiny reserves of human compassion are expressed mostly for the state and its agents.

To be honest, I have seen worse assaults, even though i think this is completely wrong.

What I really can't stand is people need to STOP USING VERTICAL PANORAMA when recording! what the fuck is this?

Johnny, here's a serious question for you. At what point should the government actually come up with something that is forward-thinking and useful, instead of something that's reactive, unnecessarily restrictive, and just strips away more of our freedoms?

To everyone, flying is a right, not a privilege, as some would have you believe.

49 U.S.C. § 40103 : US Code - Section 40103: Sovereignty and use of airspace (2) A citizen of the United States has a public right of transit through the navigable airspace

http://uscode.house.gov/uscode-cgi/fastweb.exe?getdoc+uscview+t49t50+878...

Just an FYI - if you watch the video and read Mark Lyon's commentary (whether made on YouTube or FlyerTalk - I can't remember), she didn't opt out of the scanner. She had gone through the scanner to avoid the groping.

TSA no longer sees that anything including video will be able to stop them - they see themselves as non-impenetrable now. They are God as they see it.
At least this lady did not have them go into her pants and under her blouse as they usually do.
but the latest thing is that TSA will be doing prostate exams and mammograms soon and other invasive things. Practicing medicine without a license will be legal for them. And you think a little video tape bothers them with all that power over us that WE ALLOW THEM TO HAVE !?
Why don't the people fight back ? Are they THAT brainwashed to think any of this has anything to do with 'security' ? It's only designed to de-humanize them and take away their free will and dignity. THAT IS THE ONLY PURPOSE ! It's OUR 'submissive to DC' training ! If they ever did anything like that to me, they would end up in the hospital !

These filthy TSA swine need to have an open day declared on their heads.\\

Decent people should gather their details and when the revolution comes, HANG EM HIGH!

Next time you fly, get one of these HIV t-shirts.

Then opt out of the scanners.

Break into a fit of coughing when those rubber gloves get near you and enjoy the look on the face of the TSA groper!

Who the fuck does the fat short arse bitch thinks she is

Bring in public stonings...

Charge people $5.00 per throw,

that would generate a stack of revenue...

Carlos: I was, unfortunately, told to stop filming several times that day. Thanks to people who filmed before me, though, I knew how to respond: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xwr5iuueFgo

There are several more videos from the same day (my flight was delayed for several hours) in my youtube channel.

Never thought I would see this in America. I can only imagine what my father's generation (WWII cohort) would be doing about this.

Never thought I would see this in America. I can only imagine what my father's generation (WWII cohort) would be doing about this.

Listen up all of you. Once again I'm going to explain how to put a stop to this BS. Everyone at the gate refuse to go through the xray and the pat down. Why? Because once everyone refuses, the plane sits on the ground. The airline will want to know why is their plane still sitting there.
Then you will see change. It them in the pocket book. Money talks bull shit walks. Now go for it you cowards.

Um, to me it seems that she's upset with being filmed and states that she is humiliated by the man doing the filming. While I agree that the searches are wrong, it is apparent, at least to me, that she was upset about being filmed without her consent.

Voice of Reason but not of observation. She clearly and audibly asks mark if hes is taking video to which he says yes to which she replies "can I get a copy" to which he says yes and gives her his card at the end to contact him to send her a copy. Thank you for playing try again.
"I don't mind being sexually assaulted in public for no reason so long as there is no video taken"
Jeezzz Trolls and their trolling

It's cool, I logged Johnny Law's I.P.

Hope he enjoys his computer privileges while he still has them :]

The only drama queen here is the rent-a-cop who likes taking it up the butt in airports.

People are standing up against the travesties of TSA. Go to Freedom To Travel's website and join others in the fight against the abuse of citizens and our constitutional rights. FTTUSA.org

I just dint get all the drama. It's as if all you folks were asleep on 9/11 or during any of the other subsequent attacks on planes. If you travel by air, you are going to have to clear security. Bitching about your flight being made safer just seems pointless. That woman was not held up, she was not mistreated. They do the same pat down the cops do. Takes a few seconds and if you don't have anything to hide, you're on your way. Pole will complain up and down the next time a plane goes down. But can't see the reason for such security measures in the meantime. Everyone thinks everyone else should get the pat down, just not themselves.

Seriously, if you're gonna fly, get used to it. Otherwise, drive please and quit your bitchin.

And the headline is misleading...that search was in no way aggressive.