TSA Forbids Mom From Videotaping Them Patting Down Toddler
Update: Moments after I posted this story, the North Dakota news station removed the video and story from its site. Not sure what's going on, but I will keep up with this.
Seventeen-month-old Baby Grayson toddled through the metal detectors at the Minneapolis airport Saturday when the metal on his overalls set off the alarms.
That, of course, prompted Transportation Security Administration to don their gloves and pat him down.
His mother pulled out her iPhone to videotape the patdown.
She was ordered to stop recording.
Anybody who reads this site on a regular basis knows that TSA officials have no right to order passengers to stop recording at the security checkpoints.
TSA confirms this on its own website.
However, incident after incident proves that TSA officials working the checkpoints have no clue about their own policy that states photography and videography is allowed at checkpoints.
Obviously, TSA has not made any effort to inform its screeners of this policy.
And in this case, the North Dakota TV news station that reported this incident had no clue about the policy because they never mention it.
They do, however, mention the TSA's policy that nobody is exempt from the patdowns.
But according to the TSA website..everyone, even babies, needs to be screened. The agency says, though, they do so with proper care, "we specially train our security officers and they understand your concern for your children. They will approach your children gently and treat them with respect."
I can understand a TSA official having to be put in the uncomfortable position of having to pat down a baby if that is what his job requires.
But I would think they would encourage a parent to videotape them just to prevent any false accusations that could arise later.
Cameras not only protect passenger but TSA official as well.
Now it just seems as if they had something to hide.
Fujifilm's X-Pro1, now M Mount friendly
Olympus' Micro Four Thirds 75mm prime
Can you fix the focus on a blurry photo after the fact?
The birth of Mirrorless Cameras
The Joy Of Winning A Photo Contest
Choosing your first dSLR camera
New York City can be beautiful!
Choosing the Right Light Stand
Photojojo iPhone Telephoto Lens review — AudioCast
My week with Q
How To Become A Successful Photographer
"When the Wind Stopped" — poem with 4 photos
Creating The New Family Portrait
Tips for Textures
Cast aways - saving those photographic memories
One Man Show: My 25 Years With Digital Photography
Studio, Flash, & Available Light — Three Books Reviewed
Portrait styling: dangerous pairings
Adobe Photoshop CS6 Product Managers Interview Audiocast
A gift of flowers: unfold your senses
On Set of "Love & Robots" the Film
No-Brainer Setup For A Digital Photo Frame Exhibit - Part 3











San Diego 7 photo gallery — Just Be Love All Stay Cool
Planning “National Geographic” style photo travel
Wilderness Travel 1 Rainforests – Essential Gear
Backlighting Basics
What Moves You?
FIGURES IN MOTION: Decades of Evolving Personal Imagery in Photography, Part 7
Lomography Store, Austin, Texas — GALLERY
GALLERY — Up to $1,000 Reward for Cattle Rustlers
25% off on photography eBooks
eyePhone: The eBook for iPhone Photographers
Interview with Harold Davis — Closeup Maestro of Flowers & Water Drops
Interview with Steve Caplin — Photoshop Digital Artist, Commercial Illustrator, & Author
A Brief History Of Light & Photography: Part 3 of 3
A Brief History Of Light & Photography: Part 2 Of 3
Easy technique to select, edit and sequence keywords for web
How much should you charge for a photograph?































Comments
Remember how much trouble people got into
for trying to photograph gov't actions at Dachau or Auschwitz.
When they try to forbid photography, there's a reason.
When videos disappear, there's a reason.
Public officials in a public place have no expectation of privacy, nor should they.
I think minimizing exhibitioner of security techniques and procedures is a good thing.
I wouldn't consider anything the TSA does a "security technique" or even a "procedure."
Even though their middle name (officially) is "Security," the TSA is more about acting like they're helping than actually helping.
Even if they were properly trained and consistent in their communications and "procedures" and "techniques," I don't think the bad guys are going to learn anything by watching a video of a TSO searching a passenger.
The concept of patdowns has changed very little since the introduction of video recording.
On the other hand, if a TSO mistreats a passenger, the public has a right to know about it.
"But according to the TSA website..everyone, even babies, needs to be screened. The agency says, though, they do so with proper care, "we specially train our security officers and they understand your concern for your children. They will approach your children gently and treat them with respect.""
What, do they give them a kinder, gentler ball squeeze as they march them down the gay pride parade they refer to as "security"?
Post new comment