TSA Forbids Mom From Videotaping Them Patting Down Toddler

Update: Moments after I posted this story, the North Dakota news station removed the video and story from its site. Not sure what's going on, but I will keep up with this.

Seventeen-month-old Baby Grayson toddled through the metal detectors at the Minneapolis airport Saturday when the metal on his overalls set off the alarms.

That, of course, prompted Transportation Security Administration to don their gloves and pat him down.

His mother pulled out her iPhone to videotape the patdown.

She was ordered to stop recording.

Anybody who reads this site on a regular basis knows that TSA officials have no right to order passengers to stop recording at the security checkpoints.

TSA confirms this on its own website.

However, incident after incident proves that TSA officials working the checkpoints have no clue about their own policy that states photography and videography is allowed at checkpoints.

Obviously, TSA has not made any effort to inform its screeners of this policy.

And in this case, the North Dakota TV news station that reported this incident had no clue about the policy because they never mention it.

They do, however, mention the TSA's policy that nobody is exempt from the patdowns.

But according to the TSA website..everyone, even babies, needs to be screened. The agency says, though, they do so with proper care, "we specially train our security officers and they understand your concern for your children. They will approach your children gently and treat them with respect."

I can understand a TSA official having to be put in the uncomfortable position of having to pat down a baby if that is what his job requires.

But I would think they would encourage a parent to videotape them just to prevent any false accusations that could arise later.

Cameras not only protect passenger but TSA official as well.

Now it just seems as if they had something to hide.

Comments

Remember how much trouble people got into
for trying to photograph gov't actions at Dachau or Auschwitz.
When they try to forbid photography, there's a reason.

When videos disappear, there's a reason.

Public officials in a public place have no expectation of privacy, nor should they.

I think minimizing exhibitioner of security techniques and procedures is a good thing.

I wouldn't consider anything the TSA does a "security technique" or even a "procedure."

Even though their middle name (officially) is "Security," the TSA is more about acting like they're helping than actually helping.

Even if they were properly trained and consistent in their communications and "procedures" and "techniques," I don't think the bad guys are going to learn anything by watching a video of a TSO searching a passenger.

The concept of patdowns has changed very little since the introduction of video recording.

On the other hand, if a TSO mistreats a passenger, the public has a right to know about it.

"But according to the TSA website..everyone, even babies, needs to be screened. The agency says, though, they do so with proper care, "we specially train our security officers and they understand your concern for your children. They will approach your children gently and treat them with respect.""

What, do they give them a kinder, gentler ball squeeze as they march them down the gay pride parade they refer to as "security"?

Post new comment

Pixiq on Facebook

Join the 10199 Pixiq fans on Facebook

Share

  • Share

Subscribe

Get weekly updates from Pixiq. Short, sweet, and always interesting.