TSA Policy Change Proves Citizen Cameras Can Make Difference

If anybody claims we can't change policy with our cameras, show them the above video of a Transportation Security Administration screener patting down a 6-year-old girl at an airport security gate earlier this year.

The video went viral because it revealed the absurdity and ineffectiveness of the TSA screening process, which is probably one reason why screeners and police try to intimidate passengers from videotaping checkpoints, even though there is no law against it.

One man who was arrested for shooting this infuriating video at a TSA checkpoint ended up getting his charges dropped.

On Wednesday, TSA officials announced that they are changing their policy on how they screen children.

For now on, TSA will not be allowed to grope children under ten years of age - a result of the outrage stirred by the above video.

According to CNN:

The Transportation Security Administration is changing its policy on how screeners can search children, the agency's head has said.

TSA Administrator John Pistole announced the change at a Wednesday meeting of the Senate Homeland Security and Government Affairs Committee.

The change was prompted by outrage over a video-recorded pat-down of a 6-year-old airline passenger at the New Orleans airport on April 5. The video, which was posted on YouTube, shows the girl protesting at first to the search, although she complies quietly while it is under way.

But that wasn't the only video that has gone viral showing a child getting groped. Here is another one from last November of a 3-year-old girl getting frisked as she cries.

 

Earlier this month, the TSA indicated on its blog that it was looking into changing its policy on allowing passengers to videotape the screening process after another video (this one of an adult getting patted down) went viral.

First, TSA stated the following:

This incident has also raised many questions about whether or not passengers can film at checkpoints. This topic is currently under review, but you can read this blog post on our current  policy for photography at checkpoints.

But then it "clarified" its intentions by stating the following:

There have been many different interpretations of the photography portion of this post, so I wanted to clarify things a bit. We recognize that using video and photography equipment is a constitutionally protected activity unless it interferes with the screening process at our checkpoints.  While our current policy remains the same, TSA is reviewing our guidance to officers at the checkpoint to ensure consistent application.  Our goal is to protect passenger’s rights, while safeguarding the integrity of the security process. 

Comments

Luc

"For now on, TSA will not be allowed to grope children under ten years of age - a result of the outrage stirred by the above video."

Does that mean it's ok to molest children 10 yrs and older, as long as it's for "security reasons".

TSA and Homeland Security are the terrorist.

Now pedophiles don't have to volunteer with youth sports to molest. They can get paid by the TSA to "legally" molest children. If you try to stop them, you go to jail.

Luc

Sen. Rand Paul Questions Invasive TSA Searches – 06/22/11
Rand Paul mentions the 6 yr old girl in this video.

http://youtu.be/r-elwtnWyYU

Rand Paul asserts that flying (and all travel) is absolutely constitutionally protected and inalienable right, not a privilege as the TSA would assert.

Rand Paul is an idiot! Airlines have the right to refuse service to anyone just like any business. So flying can not be a right unless you have your own aircraft.

Except that the airlines are not turning away customers. The TSA is the ones causing disruption and violations of personal liberties by policy sanctioned sexual assault.

The airlines take the money and sell the seat. Its after that that those rights to movement are restricted. I'd suspect that personal aircraft should be subjected to higher degrees of security.

Please, a pat-down is hardly a sexual assault. You should spend more of your time at the blaze or the bigs.

I'll mention this to the cops the next time they try to arrest me for "patting down" a pretty girl against her will in the same manner as the TSA. "Hey guys, not to worry, this isn't assault."

So you admit that you have patted down girls against their will and you have the nerve to call what these tsa agents did a sexual assault. I agree they should not be patting down children like this but I wouldn't call it sexual assault.

I hope there isn't a next time for you but if there is I hope your victim calls the police and you get arrested.

Demonstrating absurdity by being absurd is lost on the hopelessly stupid.

JdL

By "a right", I think he means simply that the government can't interfere. Anyone has a right to his/her own property, and may set any sort of rules (silly or sensible) that must be obeyed by someone who wishes to pass onto that property.

So yes, airlines have a right to refuse service, and passengers have a right to seek out a carrier who will do business with them on terms acceptable to both parties.

why are all TSA screeners Negro?

Post new comment

Pixiq on Facebook

Join the 10199 Pixiq fans on Facebook

Share

  • Share

Subscribe

Get weekly updates from Pixiq. Short, sweet, and always interesting.