Turns out that photography is not banned inside Nevada casinos


Last month’s story on the gambler who was illegally detained by a group of casino goons for taking pictures sparked the debate about whether or not photography is actually banned inside casinos.

On Sunday, the Las Vegas Review-Journal finally got around to covering the story and revealed what some of us already suspected:

“There are no rules against (photography), and there are no rules or regulations that govern it,” Randy Sayre, a member of the Nevada Gaming Control Board, said of shooting photos in Nevada casinos.

As emphasized by Vegas Rex on his blog:

It is not illegal to take photographs in casinos, nor are you required to show anyone your photos after you have taken them. You are also not required to have your bags checked at Best Buy or Fry’s when leaving the store. All of these “private property checks” are completely voluntary, and anyone who tells you to the contrary is just plain wrong.

Like any other citizen, security guards can only make “citizen’s arrests” if you have committed a crime. If you have not committed a crime, you are free to ignore anyone who tries to stop you, and you may effect any force necessary to ensure your freedom.

Furthermore, there is no company policy forbidding photography inside the Cannery, the North Las Vegas casino which detained Robert Woolley last month after he photographed a wall mural for his blog, Poker Grump.

However, the Cannery believes photographers are a security threat.

Cannery spokesman Tom Willer said that although there is no rule explicitly prohibiting photography in the casino, guards considered Woolley a security threat.

But the real security threats are casino security guards, according to the article.

Earlier this year a professional poker player was awarded $80,000 after a Nevada court ruled he was wrongfully detained by security guards at Tao nightclub in The Venetian.

The court ruled poker player Jim Morrison was wrongly detained after he became upset by repeated, overbearing tip solicitations by club bouncers.

In another case from the late 1980s two California gamblers were awarded $675,000 from the former Binion’s Horseshoe on Fremont Street. Press clippings from the time say the men were accused of card counting, and beaten and robbed by security workers. Card counting is legal in Nevada, but casinos can take countermeasures against skilled players.

Considering that Woolley was trying to leave the casino when he was escorted into the backroom where he was detained for 90 minutes, it look likes his winning numbers are coming up.

-30-

I am a multimedia journalist who has been fighting a lengthy legal battle after having photographed Miami police against their wishes in Feb. 2007. Please help the fight by donating to my Legal Defense Fund in the top left sidebar. To keep updated on the latest articles, join my networks at Facebook, Twitter and Friendfeed.

Comments

Anonymous
Anonymous

Cool!

But it is private property and they can kick you out.

Anonymous
Anonymous

Obviously as private property owners, they can prohibit anyone from taking pictures and can escort you out if you do;

best for them if they have such a policy to post it.

Some casinos with particular themes do not allow pictures for copyright issues; years ago at the Las Vegas Hilton, they did not allow any photos in the Star Trek themed part of the casino, unless of course you were taking your picture with a Klingon or Ferengi in the designated photo location.

Similarly, on occasions that I’ve been on back lot tours at various movie studios, they require all cameras and recording devices be turned of.

Anonymous
Anonymous

I agree that they can prohibit photography and escort you out, but that’s not the issue here. They detained him, against his will and without the right to do so, for 90 minutes. Let’s stop trying to muddy the waters.

Anonymous
Anonymous

It’s not muddying the waters. It’s just clarifying what is the real truth. That is on private property you can prohibit people from taking photos. Now looking into the camera, or taking the camera away, arresting the person etc. is probably going too far.
Steve Wynn properties had the no photography policy in effect for years, with only little arguement.
Let’s also not forget that as we speak thre are people in this world who’s only job is to scout target’s for terrorists.

Anonymous
Anonymous

“Let’s also not forget that as we speak thre are people in this world who’s only job is to scout target’s for terrorists.”

What brand of camera to those “people” use?

Anonymous
Anonymous

Probably going too far? Taking the camera is, under Nevada law, a Class B felony (NRS 200.380). A security guard in a casino is not a police officer; And an actual police officer generally needs a court order to take it.

Post new comment

Pixiq on Facebook

Join the 8109 Pixiq fans on Facebook

Share

  • Share

Subscribe

Get weekly updates from Pixiq. Short, sweet, and always interesting.