UK police threaten to arrest photography for "breach of peace"
As bad as it gets in the United States, it always seems worse in the United Kingdom when it comes to getting harassed for taking photos in public.
The latest incident comes to us from Wales where a photographer named Garry Chinchen was taking photos of a man and a boy on a jet ski.
Somebody told him to stop taking photos of the kid, even though the kid was dressed in a wetsuit in complete view of the public.
The cops were called and they ended up checking Chinchen’s images which did not reveal anything perverse or illegal.
But they still performed a background check on him and even contacted his employer, which in my opinion, should be grounds for a lawsuit because he was not breaking any laws.
And even after it was determined that he was not breaking any laws, police still threatened to arrest him if he continued taking photos.
They claimed that by continuing to take photos, he would be charged with “breach of peace” because it would be viewed as “inflammatory behaviour” towards the complainant.
Talk about a backwards system.
In an official statement, a South Wales Police spokesman said: ‘We were called by the landowner of Glyneath lakes [sic] following concern of a photographer taking photos of a child on a jet ski.
‘The officer carried out all the necessary checks on this person and no offences were disclosed. The photographer was appropriately advised regarding his conduct.’
Then later that day, Chinchen’s boss called him concerned about having been contacted by the cops.
Can you fix the focus on a blurry photo after the fact?
The birth of Mirrorless Cameras
MiMedia, letting you access your media, wherever you are
Lightroom 4 on Apple's Mac App Store
Choosing your first dSLR camera
New York City can be beautiful!
The Fujifilm Finepix X10, A Review
Choosing the Right Light Stand
Photojojo iPhone Telephoto Lens review — AudioCast
My week with Q
How To Become A Successful Photographer
"When the Wind Stopped" — poem with 4 photos
Strategies for shooting action
20 Tips for Insects on Flowers
Cast aways - saving those photographic memories
One Man Show: My 25 Years With Digital Photography
Studio, Flash, & Available Light — Three Books Reviewed
Portrait styling: dangerous pairings
Adobe Photoshop CS6 Product Managers Interview Audiocast
A gift of flowers: unfold your senses
On Set of "Love & Robots" the Film
Ilford Galerie Gold Fibre Silk Inkjet Paper — Audiocast











Planning “National Geographic” style photo travel
Wilderness Travel 1 Rainforests – Essential Gear
Backlighting Basics
A Brief History Of Light & Photography: Part 3 of 3
A Brief History Of Light & Photography: Part 2 Of 3
What Moves You?
FIGURES IN MOTION: Decades of Evolving Personal Imagery in Photography, Part 7
Lomography Store, Austin, Texas — GALLERY
GALLERY — Up to $1,000 Reward for Cattle Rustlers
Taking your Portraiture Higher
The "Bible" of Time-Lapse Photography
Interview with Harold Davis — Closeup Maestro of Flowers & Water Drops
Interview with Steve Caplin — Photoshop Digital Artist, Commercial Illustrator, & Author
Easy technique to select, edit and sequence keywords for web
How much should you charge for a photograph?


























Comments
apparently the lakes are private property? therefore the rafter pig who called the cops should be allowed to throw water on the photographer! apparently!
Crazy, just crazy. The thought police have arrived in the UK.
The following is partially from an old comment, reposting it here because its relevant to what’s going on over there-
A British woman was spied upon by her local school board, because they suspected she had falsified her children’s school enrollment forms. Phone records, web surfing habits, and covert videography. The kind of practices we assume are reserved for suspected terrorists and high-caliber criminals, right?
“They said my privacy wasn’t intruded on because the surveillance was covert.”
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/25/world/europe/25surveillance.html
So local school bureaucrats in the UK have the power to covertly spy upon law-abiding citizens?!!
To say her privacy was not violated because the spying was done covertly… can you say doublespeak? Blackwhite? Is Ingsoc already here?
Doubleplus ungood.
Things are much worse in the UK from everything I’ve been reading. Just imagine the contortions Big Brother is going to go through to try and watch everything when the Olympics hits town. The idea that photographing a completely clothed child engaged in recreation is something that should be reported to the police is so totally out of line with reality I have no words to describe it. And the fact that they called his EMPLOYER? Any cop asks for my employer and I’ll tell him it’s none of his freaking business.
Difster, I doubt they even have to ask who your employer is. Throughout Europe and the UK, it’s a matter of record.
Yeah, the fact that someone will call the police over this shows how some people are easily influenced. Somehow, somewhere, someone told this person photography in public is illegal if it is a kid. The cops actions are heinous but it is indicative of the system. 1984 is just a little late in arriving.
I respect what you’re doing Carlos, don’t give up on what you believe in – these idiots disrespect you and become police officers because they’re bullies, show them they can’t get away with it – they’re bottom feeders, and exactly what’s holding our society back.
Garry Chinchen was taking the photographs from the public highway, not private property.
Are you finding Website of Chanel Handbags Fors Sale ? Please be careful ,there are many online store are selling the cheap chanel items ,which are not original. But if you can accept a replica ,it will be a good choice..
Post new comment