Understanding Image Stabilization for the Smart Camera Buyer
There are tons of features that camera manufacturers push on their consumers every day as a differentiating piece of their marketing puzzle. As camera consumers we have to navigate through this jungle of jargon armed with only a few nuggets of knowledge.
We’ll arm you as often as we can with the necessary knowledge to navigate through your next camera purchase.
Stabilizers
Make no mistake. Your digital camera has one, or the lenses do at least. This is true whether you have a point and shoot or a DSLR. So what exactly is a stabilizer and do we actually have to pay attention to that section of the marketing for your money?
Image stabilization is one of the most important features to look at in your next digital camera purchase. Like almost every other realm of camera manufacturing madness it has different names from different families. You may see it as; image stabilization, anti-shake, anti-blur, or vibration reduction.
Image stabilization is most useful in 3 common situations:
- Low light shooting situations really benefit from image stabilization. In lower light situations your camera has to use a slower shutter speed leaving your images open to camera shake. Stabilization aims to reduce this problem.
- Zooming your lens all the way out also introduces an increased chance of camera shake. The longer your lens is zoomed out the more amplified the blurring can become.
- The loss of viewfinders on most of today’s point and shoots (and even some DSLR type cameras) means you’re most likely to hold the camera further from your body to see the LCD on the back of the camera. This “new photographer” stance introduces much more camera shake than holding the camera at your eye and tight against your face. The camera manufacturers absolutely owe it to their customers to provide a solution for this new “convenience” and they attempt to by providing better image stabilization every year.
Because of these reasons the manufacturers and the photographers have made this feature a “hot ticket”.
There are two basic types of image stabilization methods available. Real mechanical image stabilization and computer generated image stabilization. I like one and not the other.
The real mechanical kinds work very very well. They use a “floating” optical element—often connected to a fast spinning gyroscope or they make the CCD move so that it compensates for the camera movement . In DSLRs it can be built into the camera bodies or built into the lenses.
The computer generated image stabilization isn’t really a stabilizer in a traditional sense at all. It’s a cheap ploy. All it does is adjust your camera settings to try and compensate for the low light situation or added zoom by boosting your ISO or some other combination of settings. I’m not a fan of this “technique” at all.
As always, do you research before you buy. DPReveiw is always a good place to start. Look for “real” anit-shake or image stabilization built mechanically into the camera or lens.
Did you look at stabilization as a feature on your last camera purchase and/or do you plan on looking at it on your next one?
Photograph One hour with my new camera by Mags_cat
Fujifilm's X-Pro1, now M Mount friendly
Olympus' Micro Four Thirds 75mm prime
Can you fix the focus on a blurry photo after the fact?
The birth of Mirrorless Cameras
The Joy Of Winning A Photo Contest
Choosing your first dSLR camera
New York City can be beautiful!
Choosing the Right Light Stand
Photojojo iPhone Telephoto Lens review — AudioCast
My week with Q
How To Become A Successful Photographer
"When the Wind Stopped" — poem with 4 photos
Creating The New Family Portrait
Tips for Textures
Cast aways - saving those photographic memories
One Man Show: My 25 Years With Digital Photography
Studio, Flash, & Available Light — Three Books Reviewed
Portrait styling: dangerous pairings
Adobe Photoshop CS6 Product Managers Interview Audiocast
A gift of flowers: unfold your senses
On Set of "Love & Robots" the Film
No-Brainer Setup For A Digital Photo Frame Exhibit - Part 3











San Diego 7 photo gallery — Just Be Love All Stay Cool
Planning “National Geographic” style photo travel
Wilderness Travel 1 Rainforests – Essential Gear
Backlighting Basics
What Moves You?
FIGURES IN MOTION: Decades of Evolving Personal Imagery in Photography, Part 7
Lomography Store, Austin, Texas — GALLERY
GALLERY — Up to $1,000 Reward for Cattle Rustlers
25% off on photography eBooks
eyePhone: The eBook for iPhone Photographers
Interview with Harold Davis — Closeup Maestro of Flowers & Water Drops
Interview with Steve Caplin — Photoshop Digital Artist, Commercial Illustrator, & Author
A Brief History Of Light & Photography: Part 3 of 3
A Brief History Of Light & Photography: Part 2 Of 3
Easy technique to select, edit and sequence keywords for web
How much should you charge for a photograph?








































Comments
I just purchased a 50mm prime which did not have, or need, stabilization due to its speed and fixed focal length. However, my next purchase will likely be a zoom lens and it will definitely be stabilized. It could be an ultra-wide angle for landscapes, where the stabilization will not be necessary.
I bet you love that 50mm. I sure love mine. It's my most used lens.
It's a good point that you bring up. The shorter the distance, or zoom, the less you'll typically need image stabilization given you have enough light or a tripod.
I bought a 50mm primed lens with no stabilisation recently too. Two great things are the brilliant pics I can get with an f1.8 lens combined with the fact that the absence of zoom makes me get mobile and position myself right to get the shot I want.
I love my Canon 50mm macro too, Damien. Especially for my personal photography.
Andrew
The "nifty fifty" really makes you think about framing because you have to "zoom" with your feet. I honestly believe that a prime lens makes you a better photographer because of that forced practice of perspective.
Funny you mention the 50mm as your fave lens for personal photography. The reason it ends up being on my camera most of the time is so I can get natural light indoors with my kiddos.
That and I love a very short depth of field!
Post new comment