Univision Reporters Tell Ron Paul Supporter He Has No Right To Record Them

At first, I sympathized with the Univision news crew when the annoying Ron Paul supporter insisted on sticking his sign in their shot.

But that lasted a few seconds until the Univision news videographer, carrying a large camera on his shoulder, informed the Ron Paul supporter that he did not have the right to record them.

A woman who apparently also works at Univision told the Ron Paul supporter that it was “illegal” to record them with his camera.

The cameraman even went as far as asking a Miami police officer to order him to stop recording them.

And fortunately, the cop straight-out told him he was not going to stop him from recording.

The cop did try to steer the Ron Paul supporter away from the news crew so they could complete their live shot without his distracting sign in the background.

And that, of course, will lead many Ron Paul supporters to cry out conspiracy against their candidate.

But it wouldn’t have been any different had he been supporting any other candidate.

The sad part about this video is that the media really did believe that it was illegal to record them without getting permission. It’s been my experience that many in the mainstream media are pretty much clueless to the actual laws.

You should see some emails I’ve exchanged with reporters in the mainstream media over the years where they were trying to educate me in what I write about daily.

Univision purchased my footage of the arrests at Florida International University last week and even asked if I would be interested in stringing for them, which I am.

But I can’t let the potential of that deal prevent me from calling them out on the ignorance of some of their employees.

There's always going to be some asshole trying to screw up your shot. I like the way this guy handled it.


Please send stories, videos and tips to carlosmiller@magiccitymedia.com

 

Comments

There goes your stringer assignment!

Not much of a loss if they revoke the assignment because they were schooled on the law. I'd say screw 'em.

We all must play by the same rules. If they drop you becose of this you will be better off, do not need petyness.

"eng my contry, u no taka de peekshure..."

joe

DEA agent fails to prove viral video violated Privacy Act:

The disclosure of a video showing a U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration officer accidentally shooting himself in the leg during a lecture to community youths does not violate the federal Privacy Act, a U.S. appeals court ruled Tuesday. The court also rejected the officer's claim for invasion of privacy under the Federal Tort Claims Act.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia affirmed a lower court ruling from December 2010, which ruled DEA Special Agent Lee Paige failed to establish that an Internet leak of a video of his April 2004 presentation in Orlando, Fla. was a violation of federal law.
http://www.rcfp.org/browse-media-law-resources/news/dea-agent-fails-prov...

The Ron Paul supporter is 100% in his right. He is, however, still being an asshat . . . which is his right.

Your starting to sound like me.

Roger the annoying

I finally have it figured out, the media has the same rules as porno! I mean, you can't be a male porn star if you are a 3-6 incher.

Well, unless you have a camera the size of a bazooka you can't be media and the 1st Amendment def does NOT apply to you! But don't be blue, you can be pro media too! Just get yourself an old full sized vhs camcorder, and viola - instant pro! Because in the news business, just like porno, size DOES matter!

Well there goes THAT dream! (I'll let you guess which one)

Post new comment

Pixiq on Facebook

Join the 10200 Pixiq fans on Facebook

Share

  • Share

Subscribe

Get weekly updates from Pixiq. Short, sweet, and always interesting.