Video Shows LAPD Lied In Justifying Arrest Of Reporter
A video has emerged proving that LAPD officers lied when they claimed they arrested a reporter for being drunk and belligerent.
The incident took place November 30 as more than 1,000 police officers clad in riot gear cleared out the Occupy Los Angeles encampment in front of city hall.
Calvin Milam, a reporter for City News Service, was among a large group of citizens who were being detained by a line of Los Angeles police officers.
Milam apparently knew he was being detained under unlawful orders, so he decided he wanted to walk away.
At first, he tried to show his press credentials, hoping to show the officers that he was there covering the protest instead of participating in it.
But the officers didn’t seem to care, so he attempted to walk through the line, which prompted several of them to pounce on him and take him down.
The night of his arrest, LAPD told the L.A. Weekly that Milam was drunk and belligerent and did not appear to be working in the capacity as a journalist - even though the video clearly shows a notepad sticking out of his back pocket as well as him showing the officers his credentials.
The arrest begins at the 3:22 mark in the above video.
The L.A. Weekly has since updated its original story.
Alex Mannone shot the video of Milam’s arrest and posted it to The Occupied Venice Journal last week.
Milam told The City Maven that he hasn’t had a drink in 20 years.
Please send stories, tips and videos to carlosmiller@magiccitymedia.com
Fujifilm's X-Pro1, now M Mount friendly
Olympus' Micro Four Thirds 75mm prime
Can you fix the focus on a blurry photo after the fact?
The birth of Mirrorless Cameras
The Joy Of Winning A Photo Contest
Choosing your first dSLR camera
New York City can be beautiful!
Choosing the Right Light Stand
Photojojo iPhone Telephoto Lens review — AudioCast
My week with Q
How To Become A Successful Photographer
"When the Wind Stopped" — poem with 4 photos
Creating The New Family Portrait
Tips for Textures
Cast aways - saving those photographic memories
One Man Show: My 25 Years With Digital Photography
Studio, Flash, & Available Light — Three Books Reviewed
Portrait styling: dangerous pairings
Adobe Photoshop CS6 Product Managers Interview Audiocast
A gift of flowers: unfold your senses
On Set of "Love & Robots" the Film
No-Brainer Setup For A Digital Photo Frame Exhibit - Part 3











San Diego 7 photo gallery — Just Be Love All Stay Cool
Planning “National Geographic” style photo travel
Wilderness Travel 1 Rainforests – Essential Gear
Backlighting Basics
What Moves You?
FIGURES IN MOTION: Decades of Evolving Personal Imagery in Photography, Part 7
Lomography Store, Austin, Texas — GALLERY
GALLERY — Up to $1,000 Reward for Cattle Rustlers
25% off on photography eBooks
eyePhone: The eBook for iPhone Photographers
Interview with Harold Davis — Closeup Maestro of Flowers & Water Drops
Interview with Steve Caplin — Photoshop Digital Artist, Commercial Illustrator, & Author
A Brief History Of Light & Photography: Part 3 of 3
A Brief History Of Light & Photography: Part 2 Of 3
Easy technique to select, edit and sequence keywords for web
How much should you charge for a photograph?































Comments
Geeze, cops lied about an arrest?! Is there a single cop out there with any morals, values or integrity? HINT: It's a rhetorical question.
There are a lot of honest cops but unfortunately they've all been assigned to guard the WMD
;^)
Johnny Law is the best of the lot. Which ain't saying much.
The "system" protects and supports thug cops that lie. Citizen's arrest isn't going to change that. However, citizen's arrest, citizen's tribunals, and corporal punishment afterwards will send the proper message.
We don't need to hang them all. Most will get the message after thirty lashes and a bucket of salt water.
The narrator is right about the 1% (IMO less than 1%) wanting infighting among the 99% and they have been using that tool for quite some time.
"I can hire one-half of the working class to kill the other half."
-Jay Gould-
what? can't we get one cop licker to speak up for the heroic liars?
Carlos,
This one might be worth following up:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-nottinghamshire-16177043
Especially interesting were the police comments:
""We are looking to ensure all our officers and staff are aware of this guidance that prevents photos from being deleted or equipment from being seized - unless there are reasonable grounds that it contains evidence in relation to an offence and it is deemed necessary to prevent the evidence being concealed, lost, altered or destroyed."
OK so far, but then...
"No-one - whether that be a member of the public or an officer - should have to be photographed and if a photographer repeatedly continues to ignore requests to refrain from doing so, it could be deemed to be causing harassment, alarm or distress."
Ahhhh sounds like a catch-all to me. So long as someone isn't literally getting in your face with a camera, if you're in a public place...
Mike
Post new comment