Washington woman handcuffed for photography wins settlement
A 55-year-old woman who was frisked, handcuffed and detained after photographing some power lines for an academic project won an $8,000 settlement.
Shirley Scheier, a University of Washington art professor, had snapped the photos near the Bonneville Power Administration in Snohomish, Washington in Oct. 2005.
She was pulled over by three officers who told her they were investigating her for “suspicious behavior.”
Even though she showed them her university identification and explained what she was doing, police ordered her to step out of the car where they frisked her.
Then they handcuffed her and placed her in the back of a squad car while they searched her car.
She was released 45 minutes later.
The ACLU, who assisted in the case, announced the settlement earlier today.
The settlement came after the U.S. District Court in Seattle last year found that officers “lacked a reasonable justification for their aggressive tactics in completely restraining Scheier’s personal liberty.” Scheier’s experience highlights a pattern of law enforcement officers harassing people engaged in taking pictures in public.
“Taking photographs of objects or people in plain view is not a crime. Police should not presume that it is a suspicious act, and should not overreact by detaining people for taking pictures,” said ACLU-WA Legal Director Sarah Dunne.
Washington attorney Venkat Balasubramani, one of the three attorneys who represented Scheier on behalf of the ACLU, stated the following:
The court’s summary judgment order recognizes that photography is not inherently suspicious activity, and photographers have the right to take photographs from public locations. The court’s ruling also makes clear that that generalized suspicions of terrorist activity do not trump constitutionally required standards for the detention and arrest of citizens, including photographers.
Read the court order here.
Can you fix the focus on a blurry photo after the fact?
The birth of Mirrorless Cameras
Choosing your first dSLR camera
New York City can be beautiful!
The Fujifilm Finepix X10, A Review
Choosing the Right Light Stand
Photojojo iPhone Telephoto Lens review — AudioCast
My week with Q
How To Become A Successful Photographer
"When the Wind Stopped" — poem with 4 photos
Tips for Textures
Butterflies in Motion
Cast aways - saving those photographic memories
One Man Show: My 25 Years With Digital Photography
Studio, Flash, & Available Light — Three Books Reviewed
Portrait styling: dangerous pairings
Adobe Photoshop CS6 Product Managers Interview Audiocast
A gift of flowers: unfold your senses
On Set of "Love & Robots" the Film
Ilford Galerie Gold Fibre Silk Inkjet Paper — Audiocast











Planning “National Geographic” style photo travel
Wilderness Travel 1 Rainforests – Essential Gear
Backlighting Basics
A Brief History Of Light & Photography: Part 3 of 3
A Brief History Of Light & Photography: Part 2 Of 3
What Moves You?
FIGURES IN MOTION: Decades of Evolving Personal Imagery in Photography, Part 7
Lomography Store, Austin, Texas — GALLERY
GALLERY — Up to $1,000 Reward for Cattle Rustlers
eyePhone: The eBook for iPhone Photographers
Taking your Portraiture Higher
Interview with Harold Davis — Closeup Maestro of Flowers & Water Drops
Interview with Steve Caplin — Photoshop Digital Artist, Commercial Illustrator, & Author
Easy technique to select, edit and sequence keywords for web
How much should you charge for a photograph?















Comments
Seems that the CLU’s on the West Coast are settling for peanuts. New York area photographers are getting twice or three times those amounts. A photographer who was handcuffed for 20 minutes received $31,000 last year…
Cases like this are settled because it’s cheaper than going to trial. It’s extortion by lawyer. It means nothing.
I’d sharpen my pitchfork before bending over to lick up $8,000. I’ve lost that in a 401K in one week.
I suppose when it starts becoming too expensive for cities to pay for violating rights, that’s when it’ll stop.
HMG:
Photographers need to sue more often – if each and every photographer who is detained even for a few minutes sued eventually these municipalities and police departments will stop the harassment. I say make the governments who engage in detaining photographers pay till it breaks their budgets!
Washington state cops are some of the dumbest animals around. 10+ years to catch the worst serial killer of all time (Ridgeway) but jaywalkers and older women taking taking pictures get beaten/ detained? Scum of the earth.
Shirley Scheier, the defendant in the Washington case, made it clear that she wasn’t interested in the money. She seemed to be more concerned with the chilling effect this incident had on her art. I for one welcome a non-litigious voice to the dialogue.
What seems different to me (and IANAL) is that Scheier’s lawsuit was ruled upon by the judge (summary judgement) before the settlement was agreed upon.
Because of this, it seems (to me, naively) as though her legal representation carried the ball further than just a plain old settlement.
I’m curious if the summary judgement in this case contributes precedent or case law in any way… Would the lawyers here care to comment on that?
Post new comment