Who owns photographyisnotacrime.com?
Two years ago when I launched this blog, I tried to buy the domain www.photographyisnotacrime.com but it was already taken and had the words “coming soon” on its home page.
Two years later, nothing has been added to the site but the words “coming soon” are still displayed on its home page.
At first, it appeared that whomever owns this domain had lost interest in turning it into anything.
However, they renewed the domain last January and currently own it until January 2011, according to Go Daddy.
The reason I bring this up is because I am interested in purchasing the domain.
Can you fix the focus on a blurry photo after the fact?
The birth of Mirrorless Cameras
Choosing your first dSLR camera
New York City can be beautiful!
The Fujifilm Finepix X10, A Review
Choosing the Right Light Stand
Photojojo iPhone Telephoto Lens review — AudioCast
My week with Q
How To Become A Successful Photographer
"When the Wind Stopped" — poem with 4 photos
Tips for Textures
Butterflies in Motion
Cast aways - saving those photographic memories
One Man Show: My 25 Years With Digital Photography
Studio, Flash, & Available Light — Three Books Reviewed
Portrait styling: dangerous pairings
Adobe Photoshop CS6 Product Managers Interview Audiocast
A gift of flowers: unfold your senses
On Set of "Love & Robots" the Film
Ilford Galerie Gold Fibre Silk Inkjet Paper — Audiocast











Planning “National Geographic” style photo travel
Wilderness Travel 1 Rainforests – Essential Gear
Backlighting Basics
A Brief History Of Light & Photography: Part 3 of 3
A Brief History Of Light & Photography: Part 2 Of 3
What Moves You?
FIGURES IN MOTION: Decades of Evolving Personal Imagery in Photography, Part 7
Lomography Store, Austin, Texas — GALLERY
GALLERY — Up to $1,000 Reward for Cattle Rustlers
eyePhone: The eBook for iPhone Photographers
Taking your Portraiture Higher
Interview with Harold Davis — Closeup Maestro of Flowers & Water Drops
Interview with Steve Caplin — Photoshop Digital Artist, Commercial Illustrator, & Author
Easy technique to select, edit and sequence keywords for web
How much should you charge for a photograph?























Comments
I wish you luck in that.
I’ve had my own weird domain name battles myself, GoDaddy has never been helpful about it, going so far as to give a domain named after my site to the cops, er, I mean people who asked for it for free.
Registrant:
Domains by Proxy, Inc.
Registered through: GoDaddy.com, Inc. (http://www.godaddy.com)
Domain Name: PHOTOGRAPHYISNOTACRIME.COM
Domain servers in listed order:
NS1.ANGRYHOSTING.COM
NS2.ANGRYHOSTING.COM
For complete domain details go to:
http://who.godaddy.com/whoischeck.aspx?Domain=PHOTOGRAPHYISNOTACRIME.COM
Someone probably has it on auto-renew and registered it privately through GoDaddy’s masking service.
Send the guy an email, PHOTOGRAPHYISNOTACRIME.COM@domainsbyproxy.com
domainsbyproxy is the name of godaddys registar.
I don’t have an answer for you, but a question.
Have you seen this story yet?
http://www.disaboom.com/Blogs/disabled_politico/archive/2009/05/01/massa...
photographyisnotacri.me is available according to WHOIS
so was .usa when i looked, as well as a couple of others. I can understand why Carlos wants the .com name however.
soon there may be a .photo or .photography. so he might want to hold out for that.
FYI: photographyisnotacrime.tv
is available.
I like the idea of putting a name that is a political statement as a .us domain name.
I already own photographyisnotacrime.org but I like the dot com because that is what everybody automatically thinks of when thinking of a website.
Administrative Contact:
Private, Registration PHOTOGRAPHYISNOTACRIME.COM@domainsbyproxy.com
Domains by Proxy, Inc.
DomainsByProxy.com
15111 N. Hayden Rd., Ste 160, PMB 353
Scottsdale, Arizona 85260
United States
(480) 624-2599
Just call and fscking hound them.
They’ll respond when you offer the right amount of money.
Usually, when you forward a request to purchase and/or contact to the proxy holder, they will forward (by way of obligation) to the actual domain holder.
You can also make some educated guesses at an email at that website and shoot off a few: (webmaster@, admin@, sales@, photographer@, info@, etc…) in the event you never hear back.
Odds are it’s a cyber-squatter, unfortunately. Which either means paying the squatter exorbitant sums of money, or paying a lawyer the same in the hopes that you’ll get a judge to agree you have legitimate claim to the domain.
I’d get the .us domain right away.
I can never remember Photography is Not a Crime for a blog name when I am telling anyone about this site, but I always remember CarlosMiller.com.
Note to Dina: You said, “photographyisnotacrime.tv
is available”.
That’s a Tuvalu domain. If I remember correct, they derive a significant chunk of their gross national product from the fact that their TLD is “.tv”. Unless things have changed, you don’t want a “.tv” domain. Those domains are expensive.
There is also the fact that Tuvalu is sinking into the ocean and will cease to exist in the future. With that in mind, ICANN will stop supporting .tv domains as they phase it out. But who knows, because Soviet Union domains, .su are still around and they’ve been gone for years.
Note to Edwin: You said, “There is also the fact that Tuvalu is sinking into the ocean and will cease to exist in the future”.
Yes. When I double-checked my facts, I saw that. However, I didn’t mention it because the “.tv” TLD will most likely continue to exist. I don’t believe they’ll shut down a TLD that’s as useful as “.tv” (i.e., useful for television sites) when people are willing to pay thousands of dollars per domain name to use it.
Carlos as a fellow photogarpher in a large metropolitian city I have documented various abuses also. As we both know, the camera is a very frieghtening tool in the eyesight of some law enforcement officers, because it’s represent indefinsable evidence of actual abuse when caught in the lens of a camera. I m glad you have this blog to address the 1st admendment rights of freedom of speach.. I caution all photographers to be careful out there and always do what’s right regarding those pictures that expose the wrong side of the law in action
Post new comment